<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/548297</link>
		<description>Comments by Eddie_Willers</description>
<item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Why Liberals Love Obama</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/05/21/why-liberals-love-obama/#IDComment22043067</link>
<description>Oh my&amp;hellip;Grady Wilson and rjgarfunkel have really stepped in it.  And here I thought the Friday before Memorial Day would be boring&amp;hellip;  Obviously, I disagree with both of your comments.    What I get out of garfunkel&amp;rsquo;s comments is the classic utilitarian approach to history and modern issues; namely, that the ends justified the means&amp;hellip;end of story.    Excusing FDR&amp;rsquo;s actions as &amp;ldquo;expedient&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;saving lives&amp;rdquo; is subjective &amp;ndash; it&amp;rsquo;s a convenient ploy used by those who fail to understand the depth of Raimondo&amp;rsquo;s arguments.  FDR got things done alright&amp;hellip;to the tune of killing millions of people across the globe.  If that&amp;rsquo;s what makes a great liberal, well, I think they deserve the &amp;ldquo;spit in the face&amp;rdquo; that Grady Wilson bemoans.  Neither of you can possibly be serious.   Neither of you can possibly be serious.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/05/21/why-liberals-love-obama/#IDComment22043067</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>