NO you poor dense creature who is looking for sanity but can't find it in its own mirror. We want (and yes as a police officer I wanted it too when I was on the job--insert your snark here--) the RULES OF JURISPRUDENCE to be followed!!!!
For an officer to pull someone over for a DUI he or she must have a) reasonable cause to believe said driver was driving impaired.This comes from obeservations as to how many times said person "hits" the lines on either side of the vehicle, how fast or how slowly that person is driving, whether or not that person can maintain safe driving distances, basically looking for irratic driving. Now before you flip your wig over this, many things can contribute to irratic driving--including heart attacks, stroke, cell phone usage, dropping a cigarette on your lap. This leads to b) field sobriety test. which can lead to c) breathalizer in jail and/or blood test at hospital. Yes car is towed and impounded and person arrested. Would you rather have them on the street? And to be arrested for DUI is not the same as a conviction. That comes from DUE PROCESS OF LAW. Trial. Found guilty, license suspended. Found not guilty, resume driving priveleges. BIG FREAKING DIFFERENCE. But then what do I know? I was only a cop at one time. Forget I said anything.
Yes they feel may hurt, maybe betrayed, certainly despairing but if they were on a waiting list they would have HOPE for awhile. This family, because of this denial by one doctor, has none of that.
OR signify such on your driver's license.
That may be why this doctor opposed her treatment. He's an Obama bot.
What were heart attack rates 50 years ago smart guy? What makes you think heart attacks are strictly an age issue? How is it that a relatively new phenomenon of sudden heart attack deaths has risen among those who are in their teens and early twenties and regularly participate in sports? Do some research and critical thinking before you shoot from the hip with your comments. Connect some dots. Silver amalgam fillings, fluoride toothpaste, deodorants containing aluminum, immunizations containing aluminum and apparently (in a recent report I read somehwhere) small, active viruses NOT associated with the disease for which the immunization was developed. Our "beloved" progressive government is so concerned about what's happening to the great outdoors they're neglecting what's happening to our "indoors". We take in a chemical slurry everytime we take medicines, brush our teeth, gargle, put on deodorant, wash our hair, put our clothes on, or eat a hamburger. We were not built to ingest/absorb these things and we are paying a price.
Not nearly as many as are killed in car accidents.
Wow! You REALLY don't know conservatives, do you? What a marooon...
Boycott's been on for awhile around here.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Invention