<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/514022</link>
		<description>Comments by Dr_Brains</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Gwyneth Paltrow says Spain changed her life</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26159047</link>
<description>Well if posting in all caps and name calling aren&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;snit-worthy&amp;quot; I don&amp;#039;t know what is. There is just a whole lot of energy being wasted on someone that is being almost unanimously derided here as a bimbo. I was simply pointing out how ironic that is. If she truly is as stupid and backwards as people here think then it really shouldn&amp;#039;t matter what she says, right? She isn&amp;#039;t an elected official. She&amp;#039;s not all that important. This &amp;quot;story&amp;quot; was posted here to intentionally inflame people.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26159047</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Gwyneth Paltrow says Spain changed her life</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26158308</link>
<description>Standing up for America? What does that even mean. Denigrating someone you don&amp;#039;t know for pretty benign comments you don&amp;#039;t agree with isn&amp;#039;t some act of patriotism. I really wish you would get your dander up over something that actually matters, not an intentionally inflammatory non-news story.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26158308</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Gwyneth Paltrow says Spain changed her life</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26156891</link>
<description>If she&amp;#039;s so vapid and inconsequential then why are so many people getting so upset? Typical tilting at windmills.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D995MIR00#IDComment26156891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Sotomayor fractures ankle at New York airport</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98ML40G0#IDComment23694717</link>
<description>I am glad you&amp;#039;re all putting so much energy into what is essentially a non-story. It&amp;#039;s almost as if this story was put here intentionally as a catch basin for all this ignorant, racist drivel. Liberals may be bad but you all are no better. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98ML40G0#IDComment23694717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : O&#039;Brien Plays it Safe, Smart in &#039;Tonight Show&#039; Debut</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2009/06/02/obrien-plays-it-safe-smart-in-tonight-show-debut/#IDComment23159006</link>
<description>And this has to do with Conan how? Beyond your shaky premise about liberal comedians...How is your comment relevant? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2009/06/02/obrien-plays-it-safe-smart-in-tonight-show-debut/#IDComment23159006</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : So You Want to Be Tortured?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2009/06/02/mancowseriously-dude/#IDComment23083920</link>
<description>I thought the whole point was to be better than the people we&amp;#039;re fighting. Why would we even refer to their handbook when deciding what we&amp;#039;re going to do? That seems like a great way to get a lot of people to hate us for more than just our freedoms (And I know most here don&amp;#039;t care about our image around the world, but that hate adds up to us being attacked, everyone admits that). So the new rules should be: see what the enemy does and use that as your limit? That isn&amp;#039;t America. We&amp;#039;re better than that. We set our own standard and we always have. Using our enemies techniques as a benchmark is an ignorant way to persecute a war, and a lot of real progress is made through interrogative methods that don&amp;#039;t involve badly treating someone. Wouldn&amp;#039;t we rather, just for our own peace of mind, be that country and not the one that &amp;quot;tortures&amp;quot; people? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2009/06/02/mancowseriously-dude/#IDComment23083920</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : So You Want to Be Tortured?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2009/06/02/mancowseriously-dude/#IDComment23083332</link>
<description>Is it not possible that torture is an umbrella term for all manner of abusive treatment? From waterboarding to dismemberment? Not to equate the two, but to sort of put them all in a zone civilized people won&amp;#039;t approach? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2009/06/02/mancowseriously-dude/#IDComment23083332</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Easter Eggs in Pixar&#039;s Up</title>
<link>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/31/easter-eggs-in-pixars-up/#IDComment22994683</link>
<description>I can appreciate sarcasm, so I do hope you&amp;#039;re joking. But I like to cover my bases. So here&amp;#039;s my response.   Dude, it&amp;#039;s only a cartoon. Call me when you make a terse, ignorant comment on a story about a real movie.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/31/easter-eggs-in-pixars-up/#IDComment22994683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama speech to offer personal commitment to Muslims</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0d36e60ce28699094108bce0f5e6b839.21#IDComment22896800</link>
<description>Misleading title. It says in the first line and then in the words of his spokesperson, that he is making a personal commitment to bridging the differences with Muslims, and engagement based on mutual interests. Not, as the title suggests, a &amp;quot;personal commitment to Muslims&amp;quot;. And why wouldn&amp;#039;t he commit to bridging that gap? I would think, on a rational level, that if all Muslims hated us, or let&amp;#039;s say even half of the world&amp;#039;s Muslims hated us to the point where they would do something about it, we would be in a lot more trouble security wise than we are now. It sounds like we have a public image problem, and speeches and gestures like this are the solution. Who we are dealing with are groups of radicals adhering to an extremist branch of Islam called Wahabism. And as for Islam being a violent religion, Jesus brings a sword. It&amp;#039;s a metaphorical one, a sword of division between the believer and the non-believer, but in Matthew he says he brings a sword. And if Obama&amp;#039;s birth place is in question, I would like to think that since the highest power in the land rested with a member of an opposing political party, that this information would have been found out, and sought no matter the cost to his image. Or maybe, just maybe, nobody substantial sought this information out because they knew Obama was legitimate.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0d36e60ce28699094108bce0f5e6b839.21#IDComment22896800</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama speech to offer personal commitment to Muslims</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0d36e60ce28699094108bce0f5e6b839.21#IDComment22896140</link>
<description>You like the suffix tard. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0d36e60ce28699094108bce0f5e6b839.21#IDComment22896140</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : California Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98E24K01#IDComment22339659</link>
<description>Nobody is trying to shove gay down anyone&amp;#039;s throat. By that rationale, I supposed African Americans were trying to shove black down everyone&amp;#039;s throat in the &amp;#039;60s. Gay rights is a civil rights issue, pure and simple. I love the fact that Britney Spears can legally get married for 52 hours and get a quicky divorce, no hew and cry, but people I know personally who have been committed to one another exclusively for years can&amp;#039;t. Where&amp;#039;s the sanctity in that? Nobody is saying churches will have to perform the marriages, I wouldn&amp;#039;t want that either. What a church does is it&amp;#039;s own business.  But it&amp;#039;s time for people to start realizing that their own religious convictions end at the tip of their nose. Religion is a great thing, but when it starts to abridge the rights of people I know and care about? Where is the Christian compassion in that? Civil unions are a separate institution and therefore not equal. And the constitution guarantees equal rights. Also, this isn&amp;#039;t the slippery slope to animal marriage, because we are talking about two consenting adults (which eliminates bigamy, because that&amp;#039;s a right that&amp;#039;s not extended to anyone, not just a specific group). I guess people can celebrate this for the time being, it will for sure swing back eventually.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98E24K01#IDComment22339659</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Stephen Hawking hospitalized, reported very ill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485642</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Communist-in-thief&amp;quot; now there&amp;#039;s some originality. I don&amp;#039;t think I&amp;#039;ve read that one before. See? All you needed was a little push. You weren&amp;#039;t being stimulated enough. Gold star for you big guy!  Anyhow, hope we haven&amp;#039;t lost Dr. Hawking. (Had to get back on topic, didn&amp;#039;t want to be a hypocrite...Like OBAMA!) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485642</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Stephen Hawking hospitalized, reported very ill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485281</link>
<description>Does every comments section here have to have at least one guy like this parading around his own ignorance? I am sure there is a better way and a better place to register your dislike of the President.   Dude, your hackneyed barbs are super tired. &amp;quot;Obumble&amp;quot;? Come on. Wait, you aren&amp;#039;t still in fifth grade are you? Sorry little guy, my mistake. You keep reaching for those stars! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485281</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Stephen Hawking hospitalized, reported very ill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485181</link>
<description>I got to see him speak in Southern California recently. His speech was informative, but also hysterical at times. I think his greatest strength is in being able to take all that he knows and make it something relatively more digestible to lay people. I pray he gets better.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97M9TNG0#IDComment19485181</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>