<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/334609</link>
		<description>Comments by DrRob</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Attorney General Holder Dispatches Justice Department Team to Monitor British Petroleum Oil Spill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20100430.DC96773&amp;show_article=1#IDComment71525571</link>
<description>Holder Sends Justice Dept Team to Gulf...  Probably would get more done if they were sent to Golf.. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20100430.DC96773&amp;show_article=1#IDComment71525571</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UK University to probe integrity of climate data</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45738119</link>
<description>Your second paragraph is so on the money. The AGW arguement always gets muddied by assuming that if you disagree with climate change warming you also don&amp;#039;t believe in environmental conservation and sound resource use practices. GW believers assume that if you are a skeptic, you are also driving down the road throwing your garbage out the window, and then stopping to discard old plastic oil containers into the lake.   The sole hypothesis is whether CO2 impacts climate in a measurable way, causing a long term trend in warming and if so, are contributions from man-made sources are the driving force. So far what we have seen is very poor scientific methodologies and controls, much of which has been hidden from the public view.    As you point out, water and air polution compared to the&amp;#039;70&amp;#039;s is significantly better today, and there can always be improvements.  We should be focused on total energy independence, (including nat. gas, coal, nuclear and renewable), clean water and desalination, and recycling where cost effective, as opposed to some cap and tax scam of trillions of dollars. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45738119</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UK University to probe integrity of climate data</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45734542</link>
<description>It seems that since the raw data sources are  limited to a number of small &amp;quot;scientic &amp;quot;groups (NOAA and CRU) and then provided, after massaging, to other scientists outside for their analysis. If the data is flawed, scientist can reach the same conclusions. Not unlike providing doctors who are provided fudged blood test results to give a prognosis. They would come to the same conclusion, albeit wrong, due to info provided.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45734542</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UK University to probe integrity of climate data</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45734045</link>
<description>Read it and, although little tedious, well worth the factual info contained. That is where I first read about the 4 sources of raw data, 2 land based and 2 atmospheric. Very interesting as to what collusion could be involved with the 2 land based,, onoe maintaned by NOAA and the other, the CRU of  EA . </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45734045</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Struggling media will need government help: US congressman</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.abd53d78e59f7fcdc66d97d5c358d985.ae1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment45627620</link>
<description>This is why we have a governmental problem. Idiots without a clue ! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.abd53d78e59f7fcdc66d97d5c358d985.ae1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment45627620</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45626017</link>
<description>Not it is not you. I was kidding !  Irrespective of the scientific conclusions that may be ascertained by true &amp;quot; scientists&amp;quot; with sould  scientific methodolgy, it is funny to read the denier of the skeptics&amp;#039; responses. It is like giving 10 doctors the same set of test results and asking for a prognosis (except House!). They would and should all come to the same conclusion. Hence given the same data (of which there are only two sources for ground NOAA and this one in collusion), there should be an uproar of questions. Thks.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45626017</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45621791</link>
<description>Really_really 68p &amp;middot;  1 hour ago  ...I don&amp;#039;t know how many times I have to say this, but,   THE WORLD IS FLAT!!!   ...any deniers WILL be burned at the stake (which actually lowers the Earth&amp;#039;s temperature, because...(are you sure you want me to go there?!?) -------------------------------------------------&amp;gt;  You are eliminating a large number of walking 98.6 degree furnaces ?!? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45621791</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White House says uninvited dinner couple met Obama</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C85BE02#IDComment44983509</link>
<description>OutOfBalance 70p &amp;middot;  1 hour ago  I bet this was a stunt to promote a new reality TV show called &amp;quot;Who wants to be the President&amp;quot;. On this show contestants play for a chance to be POTUS for 4 years. The great thing here is you really don&amp;#039;t have to have any qualifications and no background checks are made. Winners also receive a complimentary Nobel Peace Prize and a chance to appear on next years new show &amp;quot;Dancin in the White House&amp;quot;.  Prizes and promotions are courtesy of the U.S. tax payers. ..............................&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  TOO FUNNY !!  TOO SAD ? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C85BE02#IDComment44983509</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Finally, A Congressman With a Solution: Stop Complaining So Much</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/18/finally-a-congressman-with-a-solution-stop-complaining-so-much/#IDComment43865560</link>
<description>Iheartmycountry 69p &amp;middot;  5 hours ago My God, this country is in so much trouble. Can we get it back?   This is what&amp;#039;s important to Congress?   Vote these imbeciles out in 2010.   You know, I&amp;#039;ve always wondered about 3-termers and beyond; do they stay because they can cut it in the real world? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  I know you meant can&amp;#039;t cut it in the real world...  What we need is a congressman who proposes moving up the 2010 congrssional elections by 8-9 months say March and the presidential election to November of 2010. That would helpthis country  immensely, </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/18/finally-a-congressman-with-a-solution-stop-complaining-so-much/#IDComment43865560</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Calif. requires TVs to be more energy efficient</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C24SPG0#IDComment43864556</link>
<description>circle8 54p &amp;middot;  25 minutes ago If California really wants to reduce their budget short fall they should try what the taxpayers do. REDUCE SPENDING. ==========  Way to practical and logical ! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C24SPG0#IDComment43864556</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Calif. requires TVs to be more energy efficient</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C24SPG0#IDComment43861080</link>
<description> islesfan 2p &amp;middot;  1 hour ago  I have a better suggestion to save the environment/world/polar bears/ Algore/whatever...   Just do what I do. Whenever Obama or The Governator comes on the TV, I TURN IT OFF!  -------------------------------------------&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  Well based on what I&amp;#039;ve seen of Obama on TV , you probably then don&amp;#039;t even need one!  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C24SPG0#IDComment43861080</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Limbaugh dropped from group seeking to buy Rams</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BB5J5O3#IDComment38762469</link>
<description>SameO SameO. Different standards based on ideology. This country is turning into a joke with these so called leaders. People who work subsidize all these so called protecters of the people. More likely extortionists of the people. Hey Jessie took a school bus for safety. Hey the rest of us took a bus, train or drove to work. (except 9,5% so we can pay exhorbitant taxes to have the government subsidize you. Oh.. the Circle of Life.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BB5J5O3#IDComment38762469</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20090911.DC74215</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20090911.DC74215#IDComment33996546</link>
<description>What - no ceremony scheduled  with the CIA ? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20090911.DC74215#IDComment33996546</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : ACORN fires 2 after hidden-camera footage aired</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AKORB81#IDComment33920748</link>
<description>Forbidden You don&amp;#039;t have permission to access &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-14913-DC-Conservative-E...%3C/a%3E&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.examiner.com/x-14913-DC-Conservative-E...&lt;/a&gt; on this server. ------------------------------------------------------ Any thoughts on how to access link.. Thks </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AKORB81#IDComment33920748</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : ACORN fires 2 after hidden-camera footage aired</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AKORB81#IDComment33920225</link>
<description>Probably not unlike the &amp;#039;20&amp;#039;s and &amp;#039;30&amp;#039;s with Bonnie and Clyde, Dillinger, and Al Capone. Looking for that mystique from their peers et al. Given also the culture of Rap music and gangs, regardless of how prevalent it may be, it does, perhaps, lead to a &amp;#039; that&amp;#039;s what I want to be&amp;#039; mentality. Although I don&amp;#039;t condone it,I actually think these people feel they are helping, similar to tax advisors. Look at Charlie Rangel and then ask why isn&amp;#039;t he fired?    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AKORB81#IDComment33920225</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33835184</link>
<description>The point exactly is what are we waiting for to reduce fraud. Another speechification ceremony with no new substance except throw the Repubs a bone on tort reform.    OUCH ! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33835184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33835088</link>
<description>Who&amp;#039;sWho 69p &amp;middot;  17 minutes agoHow does he not choke when he talks of reducing medicare and medicaid fraud when this bill IS fraud.  --------------- Exactly . What are we waiting for to reduce waste and fraud. Another speechification ceremony with no new substance except throw the Repubs a bone on tort reform.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33835088</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33834727</link>
<description>Did you see the congressman (don&amp;#039;t know who) on TV with a sign on his lap that said  &amp;#039;What bill&amp;#039;? How apropos. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33834727</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33831532</link>
<description>How did you get a rating of -67 ? Keep up these comments and you will be postive in no time ! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33831532</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33829426</link>
<description>I love his statement about reducing fraud in medicare and medicaid to save billions. Why aren&amp;#039;t they doing it now ! You don&amp;#039;t need a new health care bill for best practices.. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AK2CM80#IDComment33829426</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>