<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1255694</link>
		<description>Comments by DougiDoug</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rachel Maddow Blasts Fox from Her Glass House at MSNBC</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/rachel-maddow-blasts-fox-from-her-glass-house-at-msnbc/#IDComment108705386</link>
<description>Alan Grayson was just signed by MSNBC.  He of the 20,000 appearances on their air prior to election begging for hits to his money bomb website.  Not quite a vice president but a FORMER government official none the less.  You must be off your medicine to think MSNBC is more of a news channel than Fox.  By the way, they don&amp;#039;t have a rule against political donations to candidates, the personalities just have to disclose it to their bosses before they give!  Olberman gave and didn&amp;#039;t disclose it that is why he is in trouble.  What a moron.  Besides, he admitted that he doesn&amp;#039;t even vote in elections.  What an ass. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/rachel-maddow-blasts-fox-from-her-glass-house-at-msnbc/#IDComment108705386</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Anderson Cooper Scorches Alan Grayson Over &#039;Taliban Dan&#039; Ad</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/anderson-cooper-scorches-dem-congressmen-over-taliban-dan-ad/#IDComment103181872</link>
<description>You can&amp;#039;t argue with an idiot!! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Oct 2010 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/anderson-cooper-scorches-dem-congressmen-over-taliban-dan-ad/#IDComment103181872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Liberal Group Launches Profane Attack on Tea Party (Language Warning)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/liberal-group-launches-profane-attack-on-tea-party-language-warning/#IDComment93104935</link>
<description>Progress right over the cliff.  Can&amp;#039;t win th arguement with policy and fact?  Just start the name calling! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/liberal-group-launches-profane-attack-on-tea-party-language-warning/#IDComment93104935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breitbart at Uni-Tea Philadelphia: Lambastes Media For Ignoring Truth Behind ‘N-Word’ Story</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/07/31/breitbart-at-uni-tea-philadelphia-lambastes-media-for-ignoring-truth-behind-n-word-story/#IDComment90172868</link>
<description>For the record, the Sherrod video was not &amp;quot;crudely edited&amp;quot; nor was it edited at all by Breitbart to smear Ms. Sherrod.  If you bothered to do the least bit of homework you would have found out, that along with the video, Andrew Breitbart posted a narrative describing how Sherrod had come around and decided to help the white farmer.  He mentions in his narrative her realization that she needed to help him because he was poor and needed her help.  Breitbart pointed out on his website with the original video that she came to the conclusion it is not about black vs. white, but about rich vs. poor.    Breitbart is not the one who jumped to conclusions about Ms. Sherrod from the video, the NAACP and the White House did. Breitbart did not smear Ms. Sherrod, the NAACP and the White House did.  She lost her job not because of the video being posted or edited, but because the President has made our world hyper racial rather than post racial </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/07/31/breitbart-at-uni-tea-philadelphia-lambastes-media-for-ignoring-truth-behind-n-word-story/#IDComment90172868</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breitbart at Uni-Tea Philadelphia: Lambastes Media For Ignoring Truth Behind ‘N-Word’ Story</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/07/31/breitbart-at-uni-tea-philadelphia-lambastes-media-for-ignoring-truth-behind-n-word-story/#IDComment90172847</link>
<description>The local paper- Philadelohia Inquirer- ran a story on the rally and barely mentioned the Tea Party and certainly didn&amp;#039;t mention the N-word fiasco.  Here is my response to it.  Hundreds of people rallying in support of a movement many are calling the biggest grassroots movement in decades and all we hear about in your article is Andrew Breitbart and his supposed smear?  This is a new low for Inquirer reporting.  Where were the interviews of the local Tea Party members?  Where were the descriptions of the ideals and values that brought this group and thousands like them around the country together?  Instead, we get a smear of a conservative blogger.  Your headline writer needs to be fired.  Your story really had nothing to do with the Tea Party, only Breitbart.   Coninuted </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2010/07/31/breitbart-at-uni-tea-philadelphia-lambastes-media-for-ignoring-truth-behind-n-word-story/#IDComment90172847</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Bob Beckel Calls Breitbart a Bigot</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/bob-beckel-calls-breitbart-a-bigot/#IDComment89559093</link>
<description>I would pay money to see that one on one debate.  Breitbart would destroy Beckel. Hannity kills him regularly and Andrew would crush him into dust.  He is a fake and a phony.  Just a liberal turd. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/bob-beckel-calls-breitbart-a-bigot/#IDComment89559093</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>