en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/351406 Comments by DireWeevil http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AMS78O0#IDComment34407079 says the stalagmite hiding in the cave. LOL. Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:22:35 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9AMS78O0#IDComment34407079 http://www.the912project.com/2009/08/03/83-venezuela-shuts-down-radio-stations-that-could-never-happen-here-yeah-sure/#IDComment29681811 Oh, well that's just nice. What a .....forget it. You all know what she is. So this is what it is going to be. If you challenge those in power, they will label you a Nazi. So in their eyes, people who want less government control are called Nazis. This disappoints me more than the actual Bill. Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:30:17 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/08/03/83-venezuela-shuts-down-radio-stations-that-could-never-happen-here-yeah-sure/#IDComment29681811 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23341954 you forgot the mosquito. Blasted things.... Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:06:27 +0000 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23341954 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23340800 can you give me the line or lines, or simply just the passages and I will read it again, but I do not recall the Bible saying "6000 years ago, God created the heavens and the earth." And there are no specific dates. Jesus we know was around 2000 years ago because, because the Bible notes certain people from that time, and also secular records from that time note his existence. Please avoid using the term "fool" to describe people who do not believe yet (one day they will, whether too late or not), pity them, as I do, but calling non-believers fools only pushes them further back, and that is not the task the Father has given us. BTW I said the earth is well over 6000 years old, not the people living on it. My theory is that the Bible concerns only God's relationship with man, not what came before us. And who were those people that Cain went to dwell with? They were not of Adam, and the Bible said nothing of their creation. My point here is they were not mentioned earlier because there was not point in doing so. The Bible concerns itself with God's relationship with man, it gives a brief account of creation, and then goes directly to Adam. Much happened in between, but as that is not important in terms of the relationship, it is not accounted for. Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:01:54 +0000 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23340800 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23273976 yeeaaahh....too bad your statement was not. ): Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:03:37 +0000 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23273976 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23273890 The Bible does not say the earth is 6000 years old. In fact, there is no divinely inspired text in the Christian faith that proclaims the earth to be any particular age at all to my knowledge. Only recently, like within the last 100 years, has this number popped up. No Christian I know believes it, either. But it is such a ridiculous claim that prejudicial and bigoted people who are clearly ignorant of certain faiths use it to scoff at others and ridicule them. They say things like: "Look at those idiots! They believe the earth is 6000 years old!! *chuckle*" Uh...no we don't. There may be some, like there are some Muslims who want to cut off your head if you are an infadel or simply not Muslim enough, but wise people do not allow a minority to define any group of people. Please don't be "that guy" that the unwise cling to to define us. For the most part, we believe time is a relative thing. Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:01:21 +0000 http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a46bccc7bd3c753a46a24ef1f944c8b9.191#IDComment23273890 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22093945 LOL. Is it not funny that much of the far left and progressive politicians and media types look down upon and proclaim conservative thinkers as being stupid, inferior, and moronic? Yet, according to them, there is always a "right-wing conspiracy" or conservative person tricking and/or misleading these progressive "superior-thinkers". Progressive logic it seems is a bit of a intellectual paradox. Sat, 23 May 2009 04:56:22 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22093945 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22093649 Sorry, Nancy; that is not going to cut it. You led the movement to hang all the people who prevented another terrorist attack on these United States and publicity trashed the CIA for using tactics that you, yourself knew about but said nothing until now. You damn well better explain yourself on this sniveling and disgraceful campaign of yours. I demand you hold yourself accountable before going after the people who both risk their lives, and now because of the likes of you, their freedom to keep us safe. Sat, 23 May 2009 04:48:09 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22093649 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D985I63O1#IDComment21410600 Oh no! The headline on Drudge just said "Napolitano" I could not even conceive that it meant Janet, I was thinking Andrew Napolitano, and was surprised, and content while thinking "Ah, Okay, Obama may not be so crazy after all." But now, good Lord! Ugh... Wed, 13 May 2009 23:33:25 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D985I63O1#IDComment21410600 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/05/07/star-trek-flicks-best-to-worst-part-1/#IDComment21015731 I loved that one, too! Fri, 8 May 2009 01:44:07 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/05/07/star-trek-flicks-best-to-worst-part-1/#IDComment21015731 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/obean/2009/05/07/126686/#IDComment21015433 I've liked Orsen Bean since as a little kid hearing him speak for Frodo and Bilbo Baggins in the Hobbit and Return of the King cartoons (which my bother and cousins and I watch over and over again. Then with Dr. Quinn, But I never knew him to be such a great writer with the ability to explain things so easily. I really did like this article. Fri, 8 May 2009 01:37:05 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/obean/2009/05/07/126686/#IDComment21015433 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D980BRR80#IDComment20850988 This is amazing, but what makes it better is that they are not finished yet. The nerves and muscles will come back and the extra skin will be trimmed. It is great now, but just imagine how much better it will be in the next few years. A great deal of real hope is being delivered. The husband should have been adequately punished; like life in prison. Wed, 6 May 2009 01:23:04 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D980BRR80#IDComment20850988 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8e244844825401004bc0eeea2e57f5dd.261#IDComment19165636 I wonder if they realize that much of this % of unemployment comes from their punitive tax code which is driving away businesses and the jobs they create. Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:19:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8e244844825401004bc0eeea2e57f5dd.261#IDComment19165636 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=1113#IDComment18826496 Those numbers are not a very good piece of evidence. Your assume every single person who voted for Obama was simply falling down in love with his policies and knew exactly what we was going to do in office, before even taking it. No, many of people who voted for Obama did so because they wanted change, realized how much Bush messed up (primarily in economics), the betrayal of the Republican congress, and McCain was simply a very weak option. Many did not bargain for what Obama has done and is doing now. The evidence you use also assumes that it is merely a conservative Republican movement. This is not so. This is, for the most part, a "Throw them all out, the gig is up!!" movement against the federal government and the insane bureaucracy. Remember: It was a famous Republican senator who said "90% of the thousands of e-mails we are getting from my state are telling me NO on the stimulus (Bush's stimulus) but I am going to vote for it anyway." It is this kind of politician the tea parties are rallying against. Not just Obama. Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:48:20 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=1113#IDComment18826496 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18632322 lol Whatever, man..... :<) Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:16:23 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18632322 http://theglennbeck912project.com/9principles12values/#IDComment18608298 There is a historical error in you post. The quote from John Adams that you used is actually not what you portray it to mean. "This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it." -John Adams Ah, but that is not the whole quote from John Adams. Here is the entire thing, in which the meaning is very different. "Twenty times is the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, "This would be the best of all possible Worlds, if there were no Religion in it."!!! But in this exclamation I should have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without Religion this World would be Something not fit to be mentioned in polite Company, I mean hell. So far from believing in the total and universal depravity of human Nature, I believe there is no Individual totally depraved. The most abandoned Scoundrel that ever existed, never Yet Wholly extinguished his Conscience, and while Conscience remains there is some Religion." -- John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, 19 April 1817. Your quote in its entirety actually proclaims the value of religion in the world. I have not yet studied the other quotes you have used, except for the final one you claim is from Washington. Washing never uttered or wrote those words. He did not write the treaty, nor did he sign it. President John Adams, however, did sign it in 1797. Remember, Washington added "So help me, God." At the end of the oath of office, and also used the Bible to swear on, neither of which were called for by the Constitution. John Adams also said: "The Ten Commandments and The Sermon on the Mount contain my religion." -- John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, 4 November 1816 Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:35:22 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/9principles12values/#IDComment18608298 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18606453 The tea parties on April 15th may turn out to be the biggest nation-wide citizen protest against government policy in decades. They laugh because they seek to marginalize people they do not agree with and seek to demoralize them into thinking they are alone or in the very least hold unpopular ideas. Certain progressive people actually believe that people like us are in the minority, and those that do not believe this are at ease as they believe the masses are simply too stupid or lazy to understand what is happening to do anything about it. Many of the progressive people I have spoken with have a very poor opinion of the average American, and a superior attitude about themselves. Not all, but many progressive people mimic the personalities of the old aristocratic class. This is sadly ironic, as they attempt to frame themselves as anything but. I believe this movement and April 15th 2009 will prove to the laughers and naysayers that they are quite wrong in their opinion of the masses. Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:25:49 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18606453 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=920#IDComment18285160 You might even want your attorney to contact Fox News through his or her office. This could bring a little more attention to your situation. Tue, 7 Apr 2009 06:08:19 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=920#IDComment18285160 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18231026 I know, a very tight knot ;) But I don't understand what it is he is criticizing in my post. I am not a neo-con, but I don't really care if he thinks I am. But what is he saying? Only neo-cons believe that any American can be a patriot? Is it his belief that only the military can love their country and be considered patriotic? That is the ideology of military dictatorships. Is that what news_across believes in? I guess in his opinion, only neo-cons find value and necessity in the average person, while whatever belief he holds says that only soldiers have merit. That makes the opinion of news_across not only crazy, but dangerous (and a little contradictory). I love the people who serve in the military, they are a vital part of us, but they are not the only vital part. I guess he believes they are and sees everyone else as simply civilian cattle (a globalist ideology). It is sad that he has such condemnation for the masses. Despite what news_across says, I still believe that most political and social philosophies can agree and embrace the idea that people from all aspects of the United States can truly love their country and be patriotic, not just the military. This is what makes us great. Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:01:16 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18231026 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18217850 Buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! ;) A neo-con? Oh, no! You called me a bad name!! Actually, I really do not consider it a bad name, no more than another calling someone a socialist, these are simply political ideologies, and thats all. However, people who rely on labeling others in a discussion instead of making valid points either means there is no point to be made from their side of the argument, or they simply are not capable of making one. But, whatever man. I really do not label myself anything other than a constitutional sovereigntist (which by the definition of these words counters your label of me as a “neo-con”) I have a philosophy that I am to a particular person whatever they think I am based off of what I have said or done around them. The way people label others really describes themselves more than it does the person they are labeling. Most of my friends consider me a conservative; others even call me a classical liberal. But I have never been called a neo-con before. You have made it clear you do not like to read long posts, but if you actually read what I typed, and through your perception of reality you still think I am a neo-con, then that says more about your ability or rather inability to grasp concepts than it does about my philosophy. Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:46:30 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=10#IDComment18217850