<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/544818</link>
		<description>Comments by DeSerion</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Florida Straw Poll Winner Herman Cain Calls Out Morgan Freeman Over &#039;Tea Party Racism&#039; Charge</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/florida-straw-poll-winner-herman-cain-calls-out-morgan-freeman-over-tea-party-racism-charge/#IDComment198390252</link>
<description>He did play &amp;quot;Easy Reader&amp;quot; on the Electric Company... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 05:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/florida-straw-poll-winner-herman-cain-calls-out-morgan-freeman-over-tea-party-racism-charge/#IDComment198390252</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NY Times&#039; Krugman Attacks Rudy, Bush and Conservatives in Vile 9/11 Blog Post</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2011/09/11/ny-times-krugman-attacks-rudy-bush-and-conservatives-in-vile-911-blog-post/#IDComment196307473</link>
<description>Like I said - people like Krugman (and Ltrs perhaps)  don&amp;#039;t understand what leadership is and don&amp;#039;t recognize leadership when they see it...they describe it in terms they are familiar with, &amp;quot;staring in disbelief&amp;quot;,  &amp;quot;running&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;cowardice&amp;quot; for example... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2011/09/11/ny-times-krugman-attacks-rudy-bush-and-conservatives-in-vile-911-blog-post/#IDComment196307473</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NY Times&#039; Krugman Attacks Rudy, Bush and Conservatives in Vile 9/11 Blog Post</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2011/09/11/ny-times-krugman-attacks-rudy-bush-and-conservatives-in-vile-911-blog-post/#IDComment192335054</link>
<description>What Mayor Guilliani and President Bush displayed that day 10 years ago was not heroics (real or fake).  It was leadership.  Something that people like Krugman do not understand nor recognize. It was courage.  Again something that people like Krugman do not understand nor recognize.  No comments for obvious reasons indeed... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2011/09/11/ny-times-krugman-attacks-rudy-bush-and-conservatives-in-vile-911-blog-post/#IDComment192335054</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : High Schools To Soldiers and Marines:  Nix Those Uniforms</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161463580</link>
<description>&amp;quot;HARUMPF!, HARUMPF!,  Give the Governor a HARUMPF!&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161463580</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : High Schools To Soldiers and Marines:  Nix Those Uniforms</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161462276</link>
<description>yes the military is an &amp;quot;out of school group&amp;quot;...this has nothing to do with respect or disrespect.  It is about following the rules...members of the profession of arms have no problem with this.  Too many people are looking for a fight over a slight that does not exist.  I&amp;#039;d be disappointed in a school that changed a policy like this over one or two student&amp;#039;s feelings getting hurt and a bunch of people who do not understand what the real issue is weighing in with a public outcry unrelated to the issue at hand.    Military regulations (unless they have changed dramatically in the past few years, and they may have) forbid the wear of the service uniform to a non-military even unless the person is there representing the military in an official capacity.  Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines can&amp;#039;t wear their uniforms as individuals in protests, parades, or other events, so they shouldn&amp;#039;t wear their uniforms to their high school graduation.    Pick something else to be upset about, there are plenty to pick from, this one is not it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161462276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : High Schools To Soldiers and Marines:  Nix Those Uniforms</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161459329</link>
<description>These stories are not about military pride or fairness.  They are about three young people who do not yet get it.  These three young people are about to get a unpleasant surprise if they think the organizations that they have joined are going to be &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; about much of anything, especially when it comes to what they &amp;quot;feel like wearing.&amp;quot;  Those organizations are about conformity to a standard. The wear of the uniform is just an easy to measure outward manifestation of that conformity.  As for the Marine - she will learn very quickly what those standards are especially concerning the uniform of the day...not even sure what the new uniform regulations are, but I don&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t think she is even authorized to wear her service uniform to a high school graduation since it is not an official military function and she is not there as an official representative of the Corps ( I cede that discussion to a current and/or knowledgeable Devil Dog).    The other two just signed up for service and got a sash, that is great but if it is not authorized for wear on their &amp;quot;uniform,&amp;quot; in this case the cap and gown, then it is unauthorized.  I hope they do not expect to wear their national honor society sash with their service uniform...    Joining a military service means keeping your opinions and feelings to yourself in most cases and demonstrating rule following behavior.  If they cannot follow an easy rule like this one, they are not likely to do well in the armed services.    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/10/high-schools-to-soldiers-and-marines-nix-those-uniforms/#IDComment161459329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Weinergate Reality Check </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/skruiser/2011/06/08/weinergate-reality-check/#IDComment160712293</link>
<description>I wonder what happened to &amp;quot;I will never show it&amp;quot; out of respect for his family?  I hope he did not show it to two radio shock jocks and expect them not to show it.  Now that it is out there and associated with Andrew leaking it - it undermines AB&amp;#039;s credibility.  The haters will just point to this and say Andrew is a liar even though someone else leaked it...If they wanted to see it they should have contacted the girls it went to initially.  AB should not be showing it to anyone.  I&amp;#039;m kinda disappointed that it is out the next day after he said he would not show it.  I hope this is inaccurate.  Waiting for an update from one of the Bigs... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/skruiser/2011/06/08/weinergate-reality-check/#IDComment160712293</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Thor&#039; Review: Convoluted and Cold</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ckozlowski/2011/05/07/thor-review-convoluted-and-cold/#IDComment150384344</link>
<description>Your juvenile all caps assertions are annoying. Like &amp;quot;yelling&amp;quot; your point makes it more valid.  State your point and wait for the other party&amp;#039;s assertions, offer your rebuttals etc...it is called reasoned discourse, something that is neither taught nor learned in this day and age.  How a movie review of Thor got here stands as a testament of how strange the human race is.  However I must point out that the Bible does not say that Adam and Eve were the only people God created - just the first...  And your attack on people of faith is neither called for nor appreciated.  You are free to believe or not believe what you like and if you could prove everything in the universe there would be no need for &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot;   As to your later assertions that &amp;quot;myths&amp;quot; cannot be explained by science - where have you been looking for your facts to support this assertion?  If the Bible is nothing more than a collection of &amp;quot;myths&amp;quot; that cannot be explained by science, how do you explain all of the archeological evidence that supports some of these &amp;quot;myths&amp;quot; that have been uncovered over the last century?    Back on Topic: Thor was very entertaining and I don&amp;#039;t think this reviewer/critic saw the same movie I saw.  &amp;quot;Frozen Giants&amp;quot; - please...I wonder if he realizes that this is a movie about a Marvel comic book that took as source material the names, places and events from Norse mythology? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ckozlowski/2011/05/07/thor-review-convoluted-and-cold/#IDComment150384344</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Dog-Whistles: White House Decision On Bin Laden Photo Smells Like Islamophobia</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/05/05/dog-whistles-white-house-decision-not-to-release-bin-laden-photo-smells-like-islamophobia/#IDComment149231983</link>
<description>My opinion on the photos - don&amp;#039;t release them.  If you don&amp;#039;t release them and the radical islamic world wants to keep believing he is still alive, great.  They will continue to wait for more guidance from their sacred leader and it will never come...in time it will be Osama who?  So what if someone else steps up and says they are him?  The &amp;quot;street&amp;quot; are a bunch of sheep that can be whipped into a frenzy by a charismatic imam at a mosque, especially ones with photos of &amp;quot;The Martyr&amp;quot; killed by the infidel Americans...the real leaders in their culture believe that we got Osama and they are not wanting to volunteer to be next; if we can get him we can get anyone we want to get.  As for the US side of the equation, how is your life different by seeing or not seeing the photos if he is really dead?  The conspiracy theorists are not going to believe any photo released, real or not...the only way to win it to not play the game...  And on a completely different line of reasoning why give some crazy world court, anti-US group &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; for a murder trail against the US Special Ops team that got him.  Stop and think about it before you say it would never happen.  Just my thoughts...unfortunately the current administration does not seem to have put half as much thought into any of their decisions about this operation so far. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/05/05/dog-whistles-white-house-decision-not-to-release-bin-laden-photo-smells-like-islamophobia/#IDComment149231983</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Wonkette&#039;s Jack Stuef &#039;Apologizes&#039; For Trig Smear</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/04/20/wonkettes-jack-stuef-apologizes-for-trig-smear/#IDComment144823766</link>
<description>Someone needs to contact Sprint and let them know that their ads are on this disgusting excuse for a website... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/04/20/wonkettes-jack-stuef-apologizes-for-trig-smear/#IDComment144823766</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Sucker Punch&#039; Review: Grim, Dark, Unpleasant, Nasty and Weird</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ckozlowski/2011/03/26/sucker-punch-review-grim-dark-unpleasant-nasty-and-weird/#IDComment138170222</link>
<description>His review doesn&amp;#039;t even sound like he watched the same movie I saw. He missed major pieces of the movie and misquoted characters to get the negative review he wanted. I saw it and loved it. I went to be visually entertained. It delivered. I was also impressed with some of the more prominent themes of the movie. Some people may call them cliche but there is truth in &amp;quot;If you don&amp;#039;t stand for something you will fall for anything.&amp;quot; I especially loved the &amp;quot;Wise Man&amp;quot; quote, &amp;quot;For those who have fought for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.&amp;quot;   His botched description of &amp;quot; then she gets packed off to a mental institution that&amp;rsquo;s actually a weird sort of bordello...,&amp;quot; tells me he was either not paying attention or very thick...the rest of the review was so off as to what was really going on I think he just read someone else&amp;#039;s review and was commenting on that. I don&amp;#039;t think he really saw the movie. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ckozlowski/2011/03/26/sucker-punch-review-grim-dark-unpleasant-nasty-and-weird/#IDComment138170222</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Contessa Brewer Shows Ample Cleavage While Mocking Story About Cleavage</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/contessa-brewer-shows-ample-cleavage-while-mocking-story-about-cleavage/#IDComment134212488</link>
<description>Nice! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/contessa-brewer-shows-ample-cleavage-while-mocking-story-about-cleavage/#IDComment134212488</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Morning Feel-Good Video: A Sneering Lefty Professor Gets Booed At Commencement</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/evbone/2010/05/25/overnight-feel-good-video-a-sneering-lefty-professor-gets-booed-at-commencement/#IDComment77051007</link>
<description>so she asks the audience to apply critical thinking skills and then gets upset when they do...oh, that&amp;#039;s right...only critically examine what is said by conservatives, do not apply that standard to any liberals...excuse me...progressives. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/evbone/2010/05/25/overnight-feel-good-video-a-sneering-lefty-professor-gets-booed-at-commencement/#IDComment77051007</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : News Media: Stop Digging</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21788460</link>
<description>you&amp;#039;ve gotta admit that Olberdork rises above sub-witty mock - he really deserves it.  I&amp;#039;ve never heard Janemean Ga-beast-rafalo though - that is kinda lame.  Whoever came up with that was not an intellectual - she gives way too much ammunition to play with to have to default to that kind of name calling.    I also agree with your other point - that Limbaugh and Coulter built careers, as in professional entertainers, commentators - as in they get paid to be witty (and they must be doing it well judging by how much they are getting paid) - most of the blog name calling is just mean spirited.  Except when I call Olbermann - Olberdork, that&amp;#039;s not mean - that&amp;#039;s true.  Please don&amp;#039;t tell me you are going to try to defend that guy because he represents your worldview.  If he does I&amp;#039;m truly sorry...for you.  All in the spirit of debate and discourse...  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21788460</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : News Media: Stop Digging</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21786598</link>
<description>you got me - it was a childish attempt at getting away with calling Olbermann - Olberdork  - and I would have gotten away with it too if not for those pesky kids and their dumb dog!!!! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21786598</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : News Media: Stop Digging</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21783779</link>
<description>Watch &amp;quot;V for Vendetta&amp;quot; and tell me that the fictional state control of that movie is not a prediction for where the &amp;quot;High Chancellor&amp;quot; is taking this country.  The only disconnect was that the British High Chancellor was called a conservative, Hollywood could not call it what it was really representing - liberal fascism, using classical definitions - had to paint &amp;quot;Big Brother&amp;quot; as a conservative.  The state control of everything in that movie is exactly where the current administration is taking the country.  If there is not a crisis to take advantage of, how long before they create one of their own to get another one of their unconstitutionally granted power grabs pushed through the &amp;quot;system.&amp;quot;   I agree the time to act is coming and it needs to manifest in the 2010 elections or we may not recognized our country much longer. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21783779</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : News Media: Stop Digging</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21783261</link>
<description>Is it a requirement that you have to make up some inane code word for a attempt at pithy humor to use in name calling in order to be a liberal?  I understand that they have trouble winning intellectual arguments so they default to name calling (I know you are but what am I?) as a last word for their equally intellectually deficient friends.  Must Fox News always be referred to as Faux News, Fox Noise or Fox Nudes (don&amp;#039;t worry Buckwheat I recognize sarcasm 8 out 10 times now - I listened to JimBob7 and looked it up!)  With the exception to references to Keith Olberdork (let&amp;#039;s face it, he is) I see a lot of comments from conservatives about the issue and an occasional liberal calling names and using strawman attacks.  The only thing missing so far is how newspaper circulation decline is somehow Bush&amp;#039;s fault...but, the night is still young. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kschlichter/2009/05/18/news-media-stop-digging/#IDComment21783261</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>