IntenseDebate - Davegreybeard

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: No sex? N... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hummm, which particular "extremists" ya got in mind, Yankel?

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: No sex? N... · 1 reply · +2 points

Mindless drivel from the 60's - it wasn't much good even when it was new.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Taliban l... · 0 replies · +4 points

The answer is simple as sunshine, yet difficult as bringing light to darkness.

The beast will NEVER die,

until honest men find the courage to speak the truth.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Taliban l... · 0 replies · +4 points

Pretty much the way jackals decide who is “top dog” – no surprises here.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 2 replies · +3 points

Hello dumbledore, you should have received a note from me, via JW, as I replied to your post on a different thread. If you got it, send me a note.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Ben Stein... · 1 reply · +4 points

Well said as usual Wellington. I appreciate your clear thinking; steady aim and fine touch on the trigger.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Tehran Te... · 0 replies · +2 points

Very cool! I’m really likin' it!

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Spencer: ... · 0 replies · +2 points

And one day, he'll meet the same spectacular end as the old Titanic.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Karzai se... · 0 replies · 0 points

My previous “disappeared” comment, on Hugh’s post, above, was:

Please explain how Taliban control of Afghanistan (again) is a good thing for Infidels.
Because that is the alternative to the (admittedly flawed) Karzai regime.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Karzai se... · 1 reply · 0 points

“Intense Debate” jettisons all “intensity” when comments disappear into the ether.

My reply to Hugh, is it gone - or just lingering in the land of the conceived, but yet unborn?

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with Davegreybeard

People I'm following

Davegreybeard