<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/516200</link>
		<description>Comments by DarinJ</description>
<item>
<title>Cranach: The Blog of Veith : Not letting the Republicans be a &quot;religious party&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.geneveith.com/not-letting-the-republicans-be-a-religious-party/_2063/#IDComment19825328</link>
<description>tODD, you originally asked, &amp;quot;How will [same-sex marriage] change the way you think about your (assumed) wife? Will you disrespect other&amp;#039;s marriages less now?&amp;quot;  By moving the point of concern from the issue at hand (same-sex marriage and those in such an arrangement) to one&amp;#039;s thoughts and attitudes towards third parties (wife, others), you seem to be implying that one should only criticize something if it has a direct bearing on one&amp;#039;s own life.  You won&amp;#039;t suddenly have thoughts of beating your own wife, will you?  Like the bumper sticker says, &amp;quot;Don&amp;#039;t like abortion?  Don&amp;#039;t have one.&amp;quot;  You may object and say that abuse is involved in one and not the other; nevertheless:  You wanted personal consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage.  How about the adopted child who, by design, will be denied his mother or father?  Have you considered how anti-discrimination laws would prevent criticism of homosexuality in general?  How about the Christian photographer who was fined for declining to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony?  A senator from Connecticut said it best just this week: &amp;quot;No individual gets to pick and chose which constitutional right&amp;quot; they will respect. &amp;quot;That&amp;#039;s not right.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geneveith.com/not-letting-the-republicans-be-a-religious-party/_2063/#IDComment19825328</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Cranach: The Blog of Veith : Not letting the Republicans be a &quot;religious party&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.geneveith.com/not-letting-the-republicans-be-a-religious-party/_2063/#IDComment19709466</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not aware of any prominent Republican using the Bible to argue against same-sex marriage.  Rather, they&amp;#039;re using natural law to find common ground.  (GZ1 is right -- STR is a great resource.)  It&amp;#039;s sad that this McCain strategist seems to imply that Scripture is the primary weapon in our arsenal.  It&amp;#039;s probably why McCain himself was so inept at articulating his views on social issues.  And tODD, you should know by now that the &amp;quot;how will same-sex marriage affect you personally&amp;quot; line is a red-herring.  My neighbor could beat his wife every night without affecting me.  (No I&amp;#039;m not comparing same-sex marriage to wife-beating, I&amp;#039;m just illustrating this fallacious way of thinking.)  Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; would continue to erode the culture of marriage and family, which, yes, is already suffering from the high divorce rate. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geneveith.com/not-letting-the-republicans-be-a-religious-party/_2063/#IDComment19709466</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>