<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/608737</link>
		<description>Comments by DanaX</description>
<item>
<title>THE CUBAN REVOLUTION : Jeffrey Norris Emails To Mark Cuban</title>
<link>http://www.briancuban.com/jeffrey-norris-emails-to-mark-cuban/#IDComment27617566</link>
<description>Thanks for making those emails public. It really bothers me to see people like Norris equate the content of a film like Loose Change with Nazism, racism etc. This is a tactic that has become common for those who defend the official conspiracy theory and is used to place those who question it in a defensive posture. Since when are conspiracy theories unacceptable? Prosecuting attornies offer nothing but conspiracy theories to juries, then once evidence is examined and a verdict is reached, the conspiracy theories become known as truth. Why is examination of the evidence not allowed when it comes to 911? Never is a calm debate about the points that the film makes undertaken. A lawyer, of all people, should be able to analyze data and evidence and come to a rational conclusion as would a scientist.  So to go from this weak attack on Mark&amp;#039;s freedom to distribute a dissenting film by Norris to a weak SEC case with him as the attacker once again would appear to be more than a strong coincidence. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.briancuban.com/jeffrey-norris-emails-to-mark-cuban/#IDComment27617566</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>