<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/302494</link>
		<description>Comments by Daffersd</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Truth About Sarah Palin’s Resignation</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jziegler/2009/07/09/the-truth-about-sarah-palin%e2%80%99s-resignation/#IDComment26816503</link>
<description>I agree with everything you wrote here, I am a Brit living in France and I hate socialism and socialists with a passion it is war and the way they treated Serah Palin should be understood by anyone with a brain.    When I hear some of the sheep in Europe make comments about her I want to stragle them with their own ignorance.   Well said. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jziegler/2009/07/09/the-truth-about-sarah-palin%e2%80%99s-resignation/#IDComment26816503</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Iran arrests local staff of British Embassy</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026768.php#IDComment25836483</link>
<description>In London, a Foreign Office spokeswoman, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, said any further harassment of British Embassy employees would be met with &amp;quot;a strong and united EU response.&amp;quot;...  I think that having some spokeswoman speaking on codition of anonymity makes me laugh even more.     They are too scared to even admit to wanting to send a strongly worded letter, can it get any worse, I guess it has too...   And I say this a s Brit! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026768.php#IDComment25836483</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Obama refuses to meet with Netanyahu</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025763.php#IDComment19544014</link>
<description>I couldn&amp;#039;t agree more, this is going to get a lot worse... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025763.php#IDComment19544014</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Dressed to kill : Iranian snipers</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025749.php#IDComment19415412</link>
<description>Well they look like AK47&amp;#039;s but they do have sniper weapons, those Austrian built ones for example and the Russian ones too.  But I am not laughing, some of those troops are likely to have already killed US and Birtish soldiers in Iraq. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025749.php#IDComment19415412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Obama: USA &quot;is not and will never be at war with Islam&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025539.php#IDComment18293403</link>
<description>The US may not be at war with Islam that much is evident, but Islam is at war with the USA and in fact all infidels, which is also evident and as you quite rightly pointed out since 622 AD, however I would say it was when Mohammed sent his letters to Byzantium and Persia from that point on Islam is at war with all other nations on Earth that do not follow Islam.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025539.php#IDComment18293403</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Father Zakaria Botros on &quot;The perverse sexual habits of the Prophet&quot; Part V</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025511.php#IDComment18104354</link>
<description>Touched a raw nerve did it?   Did we have donkeys then? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025511.php#IDComment18104354</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Swat: New video reveals Taliban beating 17 year-old girl</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025496.php#IDComment18073438</link>
<description>This video shows exactly what Islam brings, a brutal aggresive war leader, is able to use Islam to do what he wants and punish anyone who stands up to him, this is hard wireed into the Koran.   Its pretty simple that Islam is the biggest threat to personal freedoms on the planet and this is a good example of that.  A 17 year old girl rejects a marriage to this excuse for a human being, so he accuses her of adultery, has her beaten to submit and I bet the next stage is that if she does not marry him he will have her stoned to death.    Why don&amp;#039;t normal people wake up to the fact that this religion enables people like this to become leaders among men when they should be in prisons, its that damn obvious... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025496.php#IDComment18073438</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Released Gitmo detainees may be granted asylum on American soil</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025310.php#IDComment17248539</link>
<description>Madness!!! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025310.php#IDComment17248539</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Hizballah hate fanatic barred from Britain after all</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025223.php#IDComment16873720</link>
<description>I could not reply in the earlier thread sadly, but this is worrying that many still cannot see it, Choudary is actually an honest Muslim.   I have been looking at Islam since 1997, the other day my father started challenging me because my elder brother had spent a few months skimming the surface of it and I was extreme in his view, ignoring the older sibling rubbish, this is about typical in that people are still not prepared to ditch their own conditioning to look out of their own sandbox and look at it with the Islamic texts and their world point.   I have got tired of the normal incompetence of the general population including my familly, as far as I am now concerned we are now in the time of chaos, very soon it will all blow up and to be honest I would rather that than this slow death by a thousand cuts...   As the Chinese say, we live in interesting times... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025223.php#IDComment16873720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Hizballah hate fanatic barred from Britain after all</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025223.php#IDComment16873145</link>
<description>Its hard to work out what this excuse for a government is up to, for example, it is highly likely that they decided due to their multi-cultural beliefs that banning Geert Wilders was the right thing to do but then they decided that the natives were getting restless so they had to balance it, however it is also possible that they banned Geert Wilders to balance up for banning this sorry excuse for a human being so that they Muslims would not feel victemised, I think that is unlikely as that makes the assumption that this government is acting with a certain amount of foresight, they are in fact the most incompetent bunch of fools that have ever been in charge of the UK. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025223.php#IDComment16873145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: US criticises UK\&#039;s vow to talk to Hezbollah</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025219.php#IDComment16857852</link>
<description>As a Brit, I see no rational reason for what passes for a government of my country to talk to such a racist, fascist, aggresive, murdering, lying, cheating and hostile political/religious group.   If the UK government feels that it has some sort of common ground with these muderous Jew hating killers (perhaps it does there) then I can only say that those people who made this decision should be hanging from the nearest lamp post and hopefully that will come to pass.   From one very annoyed Brit. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025219.php#IDComment16857852</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Wilders: &quot;I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose </title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025065.php#IDComment16058007</link>
<description>Geert Wilders is certainly my hope for the future, when I saw that his party is on for 27 votes if an election was held today I was really happy.    Mark it has started, we have false dawns with complete wastes of space like Sarkozy who is actually worse than teh Socialists oddly, but Wilders is the real deal. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025065.php#IDComment16058007</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Wilders: &quot;I propose the withdrawal of all hate speech legislation in Europe. I propose </title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025065.php#IDComment16057912</link>
<description>Here here, he is a great man, a hero! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025065.php#IDComment16057912</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Fitzgerald: Why the Americans Might Accept Taliban Rule in the Swat Valley</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024999.php#IDComment15825039</link>
<description>I am not optimistic, the truth is that the Afghan&amp;#039;s are always going to be flirting with extreminism as they are a badly educated population which is easily lead by Islam, however my view is that we need to fight a smarter type of war.   At the moment we waste money on a hearts and minds campaign that does not get away from their basic hate of the infidel, to really shake this viewpoint we need them to hate the Taliban and Al Queda more than their hatred of the non-Muslim, the only way that can happen is to have them under the control of the Taliban while they are struggling in a war situation and trying to control the population, before they ended a war and controlled the population with a certain level of Islamic brutality, but it was peace of a sorts following long years of war, we are blamed for bringing war back.  As far as I am concerned the smart thing to do at this point is focus on the Northern Alliance and use that as a base to terrorize the Taliban and Al Queda.   Not this stupid policy that ignores the Pastun issue of wanting to be one nation, which is why Pakistan was always playing in Afghanistan... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024999.php#IDComment15825039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Fitzgerald: Why the Americans Might Accept Taliban Rule in the Swat Valley</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024999.php#IDComment15747131</link>
<description>Here is my take on this, how to defeat Islam, simple, let the Muslims who are loosely Muslims be under the control of real devout Muslims, after about 2 years of that then its target practice time assisted by a local population who have been throughly badly treated, they will be crying out that this is not true Islam and all that, but what the hell, its only a question of time, that is what Iraq should have taught America.   Of course we know that Islam is the problem, but does it matter for us at this point if we end up with Muslims desperate to get rid of the Taliban and company at all costs... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024999.php#IDComment15747131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: &quot;Mr. Todd, if you hold nothing so sacred as to wish death upon those who would defile o</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024889.php#IDComment15403154</link>
<description>It happened to me in France, when they tried to push me I refused to budge and they had to move around me, I knew what they were doing and gave them a knowing smile, but was ready to go for them, they decided not to make an issue of it and neither did I, I had my little victory... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024889.php#IDComment15403154</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: &quot;Mr. Todd, if you hold nothing so sacred as to wish death upon those who would defile o</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024889.php#IDComment15402782</link>
<description>I do not actually remember any Mosques being on fire after 7/7 in the UK, but I accept that this proves once again the common deceny of Americans. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024889.php#IDComment15402782</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Bat Ye\&#039;or on Geert Wilders: Does defending Western values constitute &quot;inciting hatred&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15332157</link>
<description>Well in which case I do not think that you have any issue, he is  a Tory and has was fairly senior at one point, even tried for the leadership in  2005, he is also Jewish.   He was more to the centre of many in the Tory party  under Thatcher, my contacts don’t know him personally, so can’t help on that,  it was a long shot.   But I would think that you would be OK with him, his seat  is Kensington and Chelsea so no need to pander to Muslims, so if I was in your  shoes I would.&lt;br /&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15332157</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Bat Ye\&#039;or on Geert Wilders: Does defending Western values constitute &quot;inciting hatred&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15307595</link>
<description>OK, then it might be OK, if he replied back to you knowing that then he might actually have an opinion and he is not afraid to express it, he may be a wet Tory, but he was in Maggie Thatchers government at one point.    I could never advise you whether to give your real name and address, its a difficult one, but I would not expect you to have an issue with him personally.   Do you want me to check with some of the people I know in terms of their view on this, a couple of Brits who might know him personally?   I am off to bed now, but let me know and I will check up tomorrow. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15307595</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Bat Ye\&#039;or on Geert Wilders: Does defending Western values constitute &quot;inciting hatred&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15298383</link>
<description>I would suggest that Sir Malcom Riffkind is OK as he was a Tory, but a wet one, I would think he was checking to see if you are part of his constituency before replying.   And if you are not then he would refer you to your representative. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024874.php#IDComment15298383</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>