gdp's Comments

Breitbart.com : Israel army not amused as troops dance on patrol

Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:43:42 +0000

I enlisted as a 12B September 2000. I miss being in the Engineers.

Breitbart.com : Israel army not amused as troops dance on patrol

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:33:13 +0000

I know image is important, but my main point probably wasn't written clearly. For example, Israel can do no right. Every thing Israel does is condemned and complained about, right or wrong. This is a case of some Soldiers acting like jackasses when there was no current threat to them. They did not engage and kill people, then begin dancing around their bodies (like the enemy does). It's hardly something to get into a huge debate about. If they were my Soldiers I'd smoke the crap out of them for being stupid and come up with some humiliating corrective actions. But for the Jew haters, they'll find fault with any thing and every thing Israel does.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 04:30:24 +0000

This is getting entertaining. I'm having hard time reading the dribble that you keep typing. I'm sorry, but the obvious retardation you claim I have must be from over exposure to "noice." The law states the police may ask if there is "reasonable suspicion" and that "any person who is arrested shall have the person's immigration status determined before the person is released." I've read the law and haven't found where the police officers "would/could be sued" if they do not ask for proof of legal residence. Since you're so frakking smart, why not provide a reference? You should work on your insult efforts since my parents are still married and I have brothers you douche. I'd be more entertained if you at least had good insults/jokes. I'm actually offended at how substandard your insults are. I'm in the military, I've heard a lot over the years. I'm rooting for you to do better next time. Try insulting me with some substance.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:03:02 +0000

I never said an ordinance violation wasn't lawful contact chode monkey. The problem is you're clinging to a straw-man argument that simply if there's a noise violation by someone with brown skin that they're automatically going to be asked for papers. What types of party situations would warrant a police officer asking for any identification??? Probably if there's alcohol consumption and the appears to be minors parking in the activity or drug consumption. They're not going to automatically ask for papers over a noise violation if someone is brown. Maybe you should use your head and think rationally or just tell us what your shoe tastes like.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:34:16 +0000

They're not mandated to ask brown people for their papers either. What it does is give the police officer the authority to use further judgment. You seriously think people from the TEA Party would go out of their way to make sure papers were asked for? That's one of the stupidest things I've heard about this topic. Considering all of the "crimes" that have been committed by the TEA Party. Though I could see a bigot like Taguba doing something like that and then claiming to be a TEA Party member for propaganda services. So because you think cops hate brown people that by virtue of that, they can arrest any brown person they make legal contact with? Then why isn't race mentioned in the DOJ lawsuit against Arizona?

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:27:46 +0000

So how would a disturbing the peace call warrant the officer to ask about legal residency? They're brown and having a party? That really warrants asking for documentation? Seriously? Short and curlies hardly. But you can try harder to make a "what if" scenario fit into your bigoted ideology, since these "fears" have no foundation in reality except to play on the fears of Hispanics.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:24:10 +0000

The implication of the 14th Amendment to prevent people from being discriminated against would be directed through Congress writing legislation to enforce the Amendment. It's illegal for someone to be pulled over for being brown. You're fishing for a scenario by labeling police officers as racists. Do you think that there are no Hispanic police officers in Arizona or in Border Patrol? They can decide to racially profile or not now, it's a matter of the burden of proof that the officer was motivated by racial profiling, so your argument is against it is even weaker because if the officer profiles there are harsher punishments for the officer.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 22:58:27 +0000

Either way, the argument that the Arizona SB1070 allows papers to be demanded because someone has brown skin is factually wrong when there is verbiage in the law that expressly prohibits it. Can't forget the 5th paragraph of the 14th Amendment: 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. If there are federal laws restricting profiling, then it's not allowed. Again, SB1070 is compliant.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 22:54:32 +0000

Yes, U.S. citizens have equal protection under the law. They are illegal aliens, alien is the legal term. Claiming everyone who is illegally entering the country is an immigrant is intellectually dishonest and not legally correct. Go to www.uscis.gov and check out immigration. This is what you're not getting, the 14th and 10th Amendments compliment each other. The only thing I could find in the Arizona Constitution that would pertain to equal protection comes from Article 2: Section 13. Equal privileges and immunities Section 13. No law shall be enacted granting to any citizen, class of citizens, or corporation other than municipal, privileges or immunities which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens or corporations. I suppose the case could be made that profiling is niether authorized nor restricted from the Constitutions, therefor, the practice of authorizing or restricting profiling would then be subject to either Federal Laws written to ensure the 14th Amendment and/or local laws that do not conflict with either Constitutions.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:43:18 +0000

Making up an assumption about prohibiting or restricting something that isn't in the Constitution is a fallacy because the 10th Amendment directly refers the powers to the States and people. However, because it can be implied through the 14th Amendment that racial profiling would not be allowed, so then the Arizona SB1070 passes Constitutional muster because it strictly prohibits profiling by race, color or national origin and does not supercede the Constitution. Prohibiting the profiling is harmonious with the 14th Amendment because it ensures equal protection.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:40:33 +0000

Because of the 14th Amendment, racial profiling is implied to be restricted because it is not directly restricted. If the U.S. Constitution does not automatically protect or restrict actions than it is automatically a State issue. Because it is implied with the 14th Amendment, any subsequent law of a State/County/City that does not go against the U.S. Constitution is valid, even if the more local laws merely repeat the protections of the federal laws.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:40:26 +0000

No, it is that simple. I don't know or haven't read the Arizona Constitution, so for now, the U.S. Constitution will suffice. Amendment 14: 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Amendment 10: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. The 10th Amendment is clear, powers not stated are given to the States and the 14th Amendment is clear about equal protections under the law.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 21:11:00 +0000

You did miss something, the paragraph I quoted. It restricts profiling based of race, color or national origin with exceptions to the U.S. and Arizona Constitutions. That is very clear. Unless there is a Constitutional article, section, amendment, etc. that strictly allows the profiling based on race, color or national origin, it is strictly prohibited. You can't go to either Constitutions and look for the same restriction, you have to look for verbiage that specifically allows that form of profiling and if it's not there, it's not allowed. The restrictions are in place unless the Constitutions say otherwise, in which case, the liberal ignorance should argue that the U.S. and Arizona Constitutions are racist and not the Arinza SB1070. It's a nice try, but your a bit misguided.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:06:29 +0000

This paragraph is repeated more than once in the law. Sec. 3. Title 13, chapter 15 STATUTE13-1509 C. A law enforcement official or agency of this state or a county, city, town or other political subdivision of this state may not consider race, color or national origin in the enforcement of this section except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona constitution. But you must have had to know that since you claim to have been the only one who has obviously read the law. I just quoted the law, that must suck for your argument? But I have faith you'll continue to lie, lie and lie some more because admitting you're wrong is just too hard and your hippie parents gave you all the trophies you could handle? Were you rewarded when you crapped in your pants and/or in the toilet? Got a trophy if you won or lost? Still live at home in a basement?

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:58:05 +0000

I know Tagubutt hasn't read it. That's why I posted a link to it twice and here's the third time. http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/h.s... Ideologs are usually full of hate and ignorance, Taguba is a prime example of why critical thinking is important and why an educated citizenry is the best defense from an opressive government.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:55:59 +0000

You're full of crap. Here's a link to the law. Maybe you should take an exam on the text of the law? http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/h.s...

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:52:55 +0000

No, you're lying about an exaterated case that has no foundation in the law you tard. Quote the law and try proving the officer must ask for papers based off of skin color. It's a fair challenge, if it's in the law, you can quote. But you can't because you're full of crap and hate, FYI, racial profiling is strictly prohibited by the law. I'll help you, here's a link and try using your brain. http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/summary/h.s...

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:44:10 +0000

Because the police cannot ask for papers unless they are previously engaged in another policing action and traffic stops are the most frequent forms of policing actions you dunce. "License and registration please." Sound familiar? If the group of people are crammed in a car coming back from a construction site and they are legal residents, they have nothing to worry about you clown. If they exceed the safety restraints in the car they'll be cited for that. Hah hah, I'm the racist yet there are a crap load of Mexican-Americans who work for border patrol and law enforcement agencies and they'll be the first ones to tell you that illegals frequently over pack into vehicles because it's human smuggling and they get more money for the more people they transport. Why would you want to take the risk for less money? Yeah, that's totally what teabagging is... it can only be done by a certain group of people of political/economi views in your homoerotic fantasy, got it.

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:36:48 +0000

Oh I'm not worried or upset, don't worry ;^) But there is one thing that I do not do and that is relent on someone who is wrong who thinks they can have a superiority complex by being louder ;^)

Breitbart.tv : O'Reilly Debates Ariz. Illegal Immigration Law With Univision's Jorge Ramos

Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:10:31 +0000

You need to learn more about how law enforcement works in regards to illegal aliens. If someone is pulled over in a traffic stop and they do not have a drivers license, that's cause to ask for more identification, be it a green card, visa, state ID, military ID, etc. If they come across a vehicle that has more passengers than the vehicle is designed for, they are all dirty and they are all speaking Spanish that is a huge red flag that they probably just came out of the desert form crossing the border, which would lead the police to ask for identification of everyone in the car. Guess what??? If an American with brown skin is harassed, then they can sue the cop!!! Do you know what tea-bagging really is? Who are the "teabaggers" putting their balls on since you ignorantly insist on using that stupid phrase? Also, if a cop makes a stop and asks for ID and a German, Asian, Canadian, Irish, Australian, Russian, every other nationality and they fail to produce identification or produce an expired visa, they can ask.