<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/338968</link>
		<description>Comments by DTB</description>
<item>
<title>The Disciplined Investor : Audio: DH Unplugged #17</title>
<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/02/26/audio-dh-unplugged-17/#IDComment16071558</link>
<description>Andrew, Love these chats and your insights, but I don&amp;#039;t always agree with you. I&amp;#039;d have to say Afghanistan has always been the priority for Obama and he has always talked about funding that fight properly so I&amp;#039;m a little shocked you&amp;#039;re shocked about any escalation in spending. His view has been very clear as long as you listen to him and not the media recaps.   I know you understand he&amp;#039;s a politician so I&amp;#039;m also a little surprised you expect so much from his speeches. I think he&amp;#039;s doing exactly what his job calls for. When I voted for &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; I didn&amp;#039;t vote for a change in how to be a politician, I voted for a change in the focus on priorities. And in looking for proof of that change I was encouraged by changes at the SEC in this article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202428712112&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=12024287121...&lt;/a&gt;  The media obviously has skewed the expectation level on what we should be getting from this &amp;ldquo;change&amp;rdquo;, but that&amp;rsquo;s what they do, hope you aren&amp;rsquo;t getting sucked into thier game of hype and sensationalism... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/02/26/audio-dh-unplugged-17/#IDComment16071558</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>