en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2899522 Comments by DMoneyX http://tv.breitbart.com/the-five-reflects-on-death-of-their-friend-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment305933612 Come on dude, what's your point here? You're trying to be an arse at the wrong time. No reason for this nonsense now. Go see a preacher or rabbi for your answer. Fri, 2 Mar 2012 02:58:37 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/the-five-reflects-on-death-of-their-friend-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment305933612 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305485997 Unbelievable. His last Twitter post was 7 hours ago! That was around 2:00 am EST. I can't believe it :-(. RIP my friend. Thank you for everything you have done and the fight you endured. You will be missed! Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:47:11 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305485997 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment297586447 Like Harley_Charley said, there wasn't any proof for your original comment. You really just threw that out there. I always give credit where credit is due and this Sheriff came right out there and told the truth, unlike most public figures. On top of that, there was never any hate spouted by him, so he seems to be a class act in my opinion. No one is perfect though, but at least this guy was completely honest about his private life. Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:53:20 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment297586447 http://bigjournalism.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/19/exclusive-big-journalism-uncovers-police-report-from-occupy-cleveland-rape-proving-olbermann-wrong/#IDComment297583759 You don't understand. Breitbart and other conservatives in general are held to a standard that no one else, including other journalists, are held to. If he didn't redact more than the police, then libs would attack Breitbart for not redacting. Even you are not arguing the substance of the report and the fact that rapes did occur, but instead are debating on how there was too much redacting. So either they could have redacted less and faced scrutiny of exposing too much information and thus libs missing the big picture, or face criticisms like yours where he redacted too much. It's a no win situation with most libs, but the smart ones will look past the nonsense. Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:48:36 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/19/exclusive-big-journalism-uncovers-police-report-from-occupy-cleveland-rape-proving-olbermann-wrong/#IDComment297583759 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296193539 I apologize, but where in these articles is Sheriff Babeu? Maybe I missed something here, but is there anything in these articles that speak specifically about him? You mentioned that Sheriff Babeu spoke specifically about hate, and I don't see anything with him in your examples. You made a very specific attack against him and was wondering where that originated. Did I miss it in your example or are you being broad based in your assessment? Sun, 19 Feb 2012 05:31:56 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296193539 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296022658 You realize Weiner lied right? That was the reason he got booted. Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:03:25 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296022658 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296019529 What hate did he spout? Do you have proof or just make it up? Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:57:41 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/sheriff-babeu-comes-out-acknowledges-sending-racy-photos/#IDComment296019529 http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/16/breaking-keith-olbermann-now-denies-he-denied-occupy-rapes-happened/#IDComment294418672 You do understand that liberals made up stories about the Tea Party being racist and now that liberals have been caught red handed with rapes, vandalism, threats, thievery, etc., that now has forced you to change how you attack other Americans? Instead of falsifying stories, you are forced to find any small infraction by anyone claiming to be involved with the Tea Party outside of Tea Party rallies to try to pin that action onto that group, that by large, were very peaceful in their protest. In fact all your "examples" are by an individuals, and if true, will not be protected by any Tea Party member, whilst the OWS people, libs, and the MSM will protect the rapists and thugs within OWS. I could also show you 10 times the amount of thuggery stories with OWS than was ever at a Tea Party rally. I doubt you'll ever see the difference because of your ideology. Every day I try to challenge mine personal beliefs as to not be blinded, so someday I hope you do the same. Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:05:15 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/16/breaking-keith-olbermann-now-denies-he-denied-occupy-rapes-happened/#IDComment294418672 http://tv.breitbart.com/brandon-darby-confronts-occupycpac/#IDComment292489261 The question should be is he "Right or Wrong". People were going to commit a crime, sounds like a heinous one at that, and he stopped it. That's the right thing to do in my book. Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:59:55 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/brandon-darby-confronts-occupycpac/#IDComment292489261 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291733275 I agree with your last statement in that it does not absolve or indicts anyone, but the reason this video is important is because the protesters are chanting that CPAC is racist, without proof, and here is a guy to refute that claim. The protesters could have been paid too, and from another video, it looks like some of them were paid. In any case, if someone is going to make a claim of racism and then there's a guy that says otherwise, then we need to take at face value what's he is saying, if accusations without proof are being made. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:11:03 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291733275 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291719451 For your argument about the "vast majority of people who part on that particular site are in fact conservative" - we don't know for sure, we can only assume which is not a basis of a good argument. The person who posted might not be conservative, the poster may be independent, the poster might be a liberal purposefully trying to spread misinformation, and even if some of the posts are by conservatives, that doesn't that even mean a small percentage of conservatives are racist, it just means that comment/poster is racist. Also, sorry for the misunderstanding, I wasn't saying you accused me or that you post on MMFA, I just meant that I can easily find an equal amount of racist comments on liberal forums and claim liberals are more racist. I saw your comment and wanted to throw in my 2 cents. These types of arguments of using anonymous comments and assumption don't prove anything and are just bad arguments in my opinion. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:49:15 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291719451 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291701033 Seriously? You're taking anonymous website comments and then try to string them as comments made by conservatives? In a court of law that "evidence" you say is obvious would be thrown out because it's not substantiated. Do you want me to link you all the Media Matter comments that are homophobic or racist and say you are both because it's on a Media Matter's website? I think not. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:20:04 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-contributor-investigates-racism-at-cpac/#IDComment291701033 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290998275 Well done, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you knew this. I disagree with some of your interpretation such as the Patriot Act since it keeps getting renewed by liberals, the fact that neo conservatives have some principals liberals should love, but mock because of naivety, and the idea that somehow it applies especially to those who did not serve in the military. All of that is another debate altogether though. I'm just glad you have an understanding to your original comment and have made a decision based upon actual knowledge. I appreciate your time for the response! Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:28:39 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290998275 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290246232 So it's alright to shout at Andrew and CPAC, but it's not alright (free speech) for him to shout back? That's not free speech sir, and that is actually fascism in which you pretend to abhor, but apparently want others to practice. It's only fascism when those that disagree with you protest? That's irony my friend. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:45:33 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290246232 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290244279 Without looking it up, please tell me the definition of neocon, and then tell me who in that conference is a neocon and why. My guess is your use of that word is because you think it has some type of negative connotation to it, but in reality you have no understanding of the meaning. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:41:12 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-confronts-occupy-thugs-at-cpac-conference/#IDComment290244279 http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-police-stop-left-wing-protesters-second-attempt-at-cpac-invasion/#IDComment289226156 I actually read it a few times. With all due respect, I think it needs less short hand commentary and more appropriate punctuation. I'm not a grammar guru by any means, but if there was a positive or sarcastic point to be made, you lost it on me buddy and apparently the other 6 people that marked your comment down. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:37:10 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-police-stop-left-wing-protesters-second-attempt-at-cpac-invasion/#IDComment289226156 http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-police-stop-left-wing-protesters-second-attempt-at-cpac-invasion/#IDComment289219895 Who cares? If you're going to protest, then expect others to protest back, it's that simple. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:26:30 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-police-stop-left-wing-protesters-second-attempt-at-cpac-invasion/#IDComment289219895 http://tv.breitbart.com/labor-goons-attempt-to-occupy-conservative-conference/#IDComment289061807 Note to protesters, if you want to make a display in front of cameras, make sure you have a chant that rhymes and has more meaning than the one used here. This sounds like someone just blurted out something that sounded cool and the group mindlessly started chanting it.... ...brainsss Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:18:39 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/labor-goons-attempt-to-occupy-conservative-conference/#IDComment289061807 http://tv.breitbart.com/boehner-obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-will-not-stand/#IDComment287313506 Wow, that was pretty thick sarcasm then. I don't think anyone got your sarcasm as all your comments are negative. Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:09:33 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/boehner-obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-will-not-stand/#IDComment287313506 http://tv.breitbart.com/boehner-obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-will-not-stand/#IDComment287298830 Who says, you? The church can't force you to stay in its religion. You either choose to follow a church's belief or you don't. If you choose to follow a church's edict, then that's a choice you made. So ultimately in this country if you don't want to follow a church, you can leave it....that's not even close to Iran. BTW, typing as you do doesn't bypass any censors except maybe built in language checks. If you make a post and it goes through the automatic checks, then the only way to remove a post is by a manual process (person), and that person can still read your posts. So what you're doing really doesn't matter. Hopefully that'll save you some time when typing in the future. Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:46:37 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/boehner-obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-will-not-stand/#IDComment287298830