<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/239963</link>
		<description>Comments by CyberLizard</description>
<item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : You&#039;re having sex with *how* many people?!?</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128600244</link>
<description>Since the attractiveness of Captain Jack is ubiquitous, I&amp;#039;d say his inclusion is the ultimate data point. For any argument.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128600244</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : You&#039;re having sex with *how* many people?!?</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128600021</link>
<description>Absolutely </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128600021</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : You&#039;re having sex with *how* many people?!?</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128599869</link>
<description>Interesting point. For the sake of definition I&amp;#039;d say that having, or being open to having, more than one relationship would be required. Situations may result in individuals who identify as polyamorous only seeing one person or even no persons, though that wouldn&amp;#039;t negate their self-identifying as polyamorous, though they may not currently be in a polyamorous relationship, any more than not currently having a parter of the same sex would prevent that person from self-identifying as a homosexual and wow was that a runon sentence! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2011/02/youre-having-sex-with-how-many-people.html#IDComment128599869</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : Victim blaming bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85836518</link>
<description>Heh, one thing about me, I&amp;#039;m never worried about being &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot;! :-)  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85836518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : Victim blaming bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85836409</link>
<description>Thanks. I&amp;#039;m not perfect, but I try my damndest to be aware of the indoctrination that our society imposes on us and to fight against it.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85836409</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : Victim blaming bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85835956</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re welcome!  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85835956</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : Victim blaming bullshit</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85835930</link>
<description>I think it&amp;#039;s very romantic (and hot!) Who doesn&amp;#039;t want to hear someone tell them they want to have sex with them? ;-)   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/07/victim-blaming-bullshit.html#IDComment85835930</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : This is why I won&#039;t sit down and shut up</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/03/this-is-why-i-wont-sit-down-and-shut-up.html#IDComment64089551</link>
<description>We&amp;#39;ve taught our children to evaluate people based on their words and actions and to be understanding and tolerant. We&amp;#39;ve taught them to respect people and to question ideas and beliefs. We would never in a million years tell our kid to not play with a neighbor because they were christian (or hindu or muslim, etc). That makes no sense. In the same vein, we didn&amp;#39;t teach our kids that there was no god or try to indoctrinate him, either. As I&amp;#39;ve blogged before�we let him develop his own beliefs. Sure, we explain our own and why we feel the way we do, but we don&amp;#39;t tell them they have to believe the way we do. I haven&amp;#39;t met an atheist with kids yet who has taught their kid differently. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/03/this-is-why-i-wont-sit-down-and-shut-up.html#IDComment64089551</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Watching the Wheels : We&#039;re Becoming!</title>
<link>http://www.watchingthewheels.net/site-notifications/hello-world/#IDComment56194502</link>
<description>Hey! It&amp;#039;s coming along well. How does this comment look? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.watchingthewheels.net/site-notifications/hello-world/#IDComment56194502</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : The Intersection of Boobies and Skepticism: or Why the Skepchicks rock</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/the-intersection-of-boobies-and-skepticism-or-why-the-skepchicks-rock.html#IDComment53205040</link>
<description>Thank you, sir. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/the-intersection-of-boobies-and-skepticism-or-why-the-skepchicks-rock.html#IDComment53205040</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : The Intersection of Boobies and Skepticism: or Why the Skepchicks rock</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/the-intersection-of-boobies-and-skepticism-or-why-the-skepchicks-rock.html#IDComment53205029</link>
<description>&amp;quot;...no one is gonna put a burqa or chastity belt on me or my tongue.&amp;quot; Fantastic! I love it. Good for you. It&amp;#039;s important for people to take ownership of their sexuality and bodies, whether that means they choose to show them off or not. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/the-intersection-of-boobies-and-skepticism-or-why-the-skepchicks-rock.html#IDComment53205029</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : I want to kick Jesus in the nuts!</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment53170819</link>
<description>I actually do. I\\\&#039;m in direct contact with the girl involved. She\\\&#039;s gotten them to back down and re-installed her TweetDeck. They realised they were on *very* shaky ground, I think. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment53170819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : I want to kick Jesus in the nuts!</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment53171035</link>
<description>What about the fact that she was singled out, when others in the department openly have that kind of software installed? The day after she was outed as an atheist? I think there would be enough there to at least put the fear of god into them, pun intended ;-) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment53171035</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : I want to kick Jesus in the nuts!</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment52685581</link>
<description>The issue has more to do with the singling her out. I can understand a blanket sweep to clear everyone&amp;#039;s computers of unauthorized apps, but only she got tapped. And they went through her stuff AND they moved her fucking desk! This kind of crap is unacceptable.  And I won&amp;#039;t complain about unproductive boyfriend-blog commenting ;-) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2010/01/i-want-to-kick-jesus-in-the-nuts.html#IDComment52685581</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : #boobiewed</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/10/boobiewed.html#IDComment38844174</link>
<description>Did you say &amp;quot;boobies&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/10/boobiewed.html#IDComment38844174</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Oh look, it&#039;s a wild Scilon!</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/10/oh-look-its-wild-scilon.html#IDComment37968742</link>
<description>crazy scilons R crazy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/10/oh-look-its-wild-scilon.html#IDComment37968742</guid>
</item><item>
<title>CyberLizard&#039;s Collection : The kid makes vintage look good</title>
<link>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2009/10/the-kid-makes-vintage-look-good.html#IDComment37726911</link>
<description>Thanks! I just can&amp;#39;t figure out why people are so threatened by non-traditional gender roles. The hard part about this post was getting over my jealousy at how good he looks. I&amp;#39;ve lost my \&quot;baby face\&quot;, so I can&amp;#39;t pull that look off as well ;-) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberlizard.com/2009/10/the-kid-makes-vintage-look-good.html#IDComment37726911</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lousy Canuck : I have to push the pram a looooooot</title>
<link>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2227#IDComment37515227</link>
<description>Holy crap that&amp;#039;s funny! I love the scene with Pike.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2227#IDComment37515227</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lousy Canuck : Do you waaaant to go back to my place bouncy bouncy?</title>
<link>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2236#IDComment37513759</link>
<description>Whilst I knew about the origins of spam, I still haven&amp;#039;t seen Life of Brian. But I have seen Holy Grail, so I&amp;#039;m not a total loss </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2236#IDComment37513759</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lousy Canuck : IntenseDebate plugin</title>
<link>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2240#IDComment37513665</link>
<description>On Chrome, there are funky unrenderable characters at the end of each line. CRLF&amp;#039;s perhaps? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.lousycanuck.ca/?p=2240#IDComment37513665</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>