<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/292202</link>
		<description>Comments by Custom_TShirt_Guy</description>
<item>
<title>BlueVerse : Blog Income Report - Dec 08</title>
<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2009/01/01/blog-income-report-dec-08/#IDComment13481273</link>
<description>That is pretty cool I&amp;#039;m glad I can be apart of a winning blog. Good Luck to you this year. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.blueverse.com/2009/01/01/blog-income-report-dec-08/#IDComment13481273</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BlueVerse : Keyword Fluffing vs. Keyword Stuffing: Who’s In, Who’s Out?</title>
<link>http://www.blueverse.com/2008/12/27/keyword-fluffing-vs-keyword-stuffing-whos-in-whos-out/#IDComment13300324</link>
<description>That was a great article. I just wanted to comment on a few things that I do for my online business. Personally I agree that in resent years keywords are on the verge of becoming spammy, so what I do to try to make my keywords look less like spam was to limit the number of keywords, and have those keywords be in direct relation to the product or have off spellings of that item. Take for example a T-Shirt, some of the keywords that I would use would be t-shirt, t shirt, tshirt, shirt, tee, whether it is custom or blank, and usually the brand and number of the shirt. I know that my seem like a lot of keywords but all but 3 of them are multiply spellings of the  word so it can reach more people.  Thanks Custom T-Shirt Guy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.blueverse.com/2008/12/27/keyword-fluffing-vs-keyword-stuffing-whos-in-whos-out/#IDComment13300324</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>