<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/311444</link>
		<description>Comments by Crazy_Ivan</description>
<item>
<title>Libertoad : Read the Fine Print...All 1,400 Pages of It</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/08/25/read-the-fine-print-all-1400-pages-of-it/#IDComment59411780</link>
<description>Even more importantly is the fact that the elected legislature who&amp;#039;s mandate it is to write the laws aren&amp;#039;t even reading the laws anymore. The laws are being written by unelected staffers who operate with no mandate from any constituency. Our whole system of government has been outsourced. Pretty soon the legislation that governs this country will be written by cheaply hired legal experts somewhere in Bangalore, India. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/08/25/read-the-fine-print-all-1400-pages-of-it/#IDComment59411780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertarian Hotties : Frequently Asked Questions</title>
<link>http://libhotties.com/faq#IDComment32720034</link>
<description>Never a shortage of trolls on the net. Perhaps you could enlighten us poor retards with an explanation of why centralized authoritarian government is so much more preferable to the traditions of liberty as outlined in the founding documents of this republic.   By the way, I think your burqua is on too tight.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://libhotties.com/faq#IDComment32720034</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Chicken Soup For the Soulless : Offensively Delicious: God &amp; Liberty</title>
<link>http://soulless.devmedio.com/2009/06/11/199/#IDComment23968774</link>
<description>The construct of God as depicted in the circles of organized religion is merely a tool. Actually, if anyone reads the Bible it should be clear to them that God is a real tool, but I digress. Kings and Queens throughout history used the concept of Divine Right as justification for their tyranny. You can oppose a Monarch, but a mere mortal cannot oppose God. If God wants a tyrant to be in charge, you&amp;#039;d better shut up and live with it. I think the very concept of organized religion exists for the sole purpose of empowering the clergy and dis empowering the people. Churches are an awful lot like government. They demand complete devotion, do a little song and dance, take your money and redistribute it as they see fit.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://soulless.devmedio.com/2009/06/11/199/#IDComment23968774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : I shall call you… Minarchy!</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/06/02/i-shall-call-you%e2%80%a6-minarchy/#IDComment23247840</link>
<description>Those little bastages think their such hot shit with technology. Guys like you and I could easily smoke &amp;#039;em in the computer cleverness department. Age and guile will defeat youth and cockiness almost every time. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/06/02/i-shall-call-you%e2%80%a6-minarchy/#IDComment23247840</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Californication in the butt</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/06/01/californication-in-the-butt/#IDComment23125915</link>
<description>California should take a lesson from what happened to General Motors. After receiving billions of tax dollars for a bailout only a few months ago, they still ended up declaring bankruptcy this week. The Government Bailout did nothing except line the pockets of corrupt UAW officials and GM upper management functionaries. Throwing money at failure is only going to delay the inevitable. The crack addict analogy is very apt. Unfortunately, to add insult to injury GM is still beholden to Congress. The U.S. Congress is now in the automobile manufacturing business. The next line of cars G.M. designs are likely to be even more expensive and twice as crappy as the ones that drove them into bankruptcy in the first place. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/06/01/californication-in-the-butt/#IDComment23125915</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Get Out!</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/05/29/get-out/#IDComment22996490</link>
<description>Exactly. Socialism is about wielding power over others. The socialist justifies his thirst for power by claiming they want to wield this power to bring about justice and fairness. But this would imply that he and others like him have the ethical and moral superiority to determine what would be just and fair for everyone.   They are not unlike the missionaries of centuries past who set out to save the souls of the wretched savages of the New World whether they wanted their souls saved or not. These missionaries did horrible things in order to spread their message including torture, coercion, and murder. Pol Pot, Stalin, and Mao did the same things to promote the &amp;quot;justice&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;fairness&amp;quot; of their own ideology. These three historical figures are shining examples of what socialism is really all about. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/05/29/get-out/#IDComment22996490</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Ivy League Losers</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/11/ivy-league-losers/#IDComment22588009</link>
<description>My point is that it&amp;#039;s much ado about nothing. If Olbermann had half a brain he wouldn&amp;#039;t have let Coulter bait him in such a way. It&amp;#039;s obvious that Ann Coulter&amp;#039;s article was a hit piece meant to rattle his cage and it worked. As far as bashing communications majors and graduates goes, I think I&amp;#039;m well within my rights to do so. As I mentioned in my post, a chimpanzee with cerebral palsy could get a communications degree. It&amp;#039;s worthless. Having taken communications classes in college, I can verify that these courses are devoid of any meaningful intellectual challenge.  By my scale, I would put engineering majors above business majors. The engineering programs generally have greater academic rigor than the business programs. No business major has ever had to take both multivariable calculus and differential equations as requirements to graduate. By my scale the harder degrees are the more valuable. This is not only by my scale, this is the scale of the real world outside the confines of college.  There&amp;#039;s a reason why communications majors usually end up with lower-income jobs. That sort of degree doesn&amp;#039;t provide the graduate with any significant marketable skills. If you check out the students who graduate with degrees in hard science or engineering, most of them are hired right out of college into lucrative career fields. That&amp;#039;s usually not the case with liberal arts graduates. I don&amp;#039;t think Keith Olbermann should be ridiculed for whichever branch of Cornell he attended. He should be ridiculed for having a degree in communications. With an Ivy League education like that he&amp;#039;s almost qualified to make french fries. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/11/ivy-league-losers/#IDComment22588009</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Shooting The Messenger</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/17/shooting-the-messenger/#IDComment19487188</link>
<description>Thanks Frank. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/17/shooting-the-messenger/#IDComment19487188</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : The Universal Hypothesis of Fail</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/09/the-universal-hypothesis-of-fail/#IDComment18681016</link>
<description>I can see what you mean by the religious right compromising a group&amp;#039;s original intent. However, they should still not be excluded from the freedom movement. In the political arena we do have a common opponent in the socialistic left-of-center movement in this country. It kinda comes down to the old &amp;quot;the enemy of my enemy is my friend&amp;quot; adage. Political alliances are messy at best, but then again so is politics in general.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/09/the-universal-hypothesis-of-fail/#IDComment18681016</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : The Universal Hypothesis of Fail</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/09/the-universal-hypothesis-of-fail/#IDComment18506494</link>
<description>I would also hypothesize that because the freedom movement is essentially individualistic, it&amp;#039;s difficult if not impossible to unite the various factions of the movement in common cause. It&amp;#039;s like herding cats. People in the freedom movement often bicker on unwavering matters of principle instead of tabling those details for the sake of having general unity.   Remember the Obama rallies during his campaign? There were swarms of zombie-like followers chanting &amp;quot;Yes we can!&amp;quot; at the top of their lungs. You would never see anything like that at a libertarian rally. Collectivists will always be in the majority because collectivism by it&amp;#039;s very nature builds majorities.   This is the reason that the libertarian movement cannot afford to divorce themselves from the religious right. For better or worse, the individualists need to collectivize if they want to invoke any political change. Religious clergy have a real knack for this. This is why the Christian Coalition was able to rally people to the Republican Party during the late &amp;#039;70s and early &amp;#039;80s.   As libertarians and individualists we may need to strike a Faustian bargain with certain collectivists for the sake of political change. Otherwise the impact of the freedom movement will be strictly academic.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/09/the-universal-hypothesis-of-fail/#IDComment18506494</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Women In Politics</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/01/women-in-politics/#IDComment17972292</link>
<description>I was waiting for some sort of punch line eventually.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/04/01/women-in-politics/#IDComment17972292</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Earth Hour</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17925315</link>
<description>I found another link to the same article and I corrected the link in the post to correspond. I&amp;#039;ll even post it here in the comments. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/24/111033.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/06/24/111033...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17925315</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Congress Doesn’t Care About Young People</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/congress-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-young-people/#IDComment17922742</link>
<description>Socialism requires that people (particularly young people) be conscripted by the government to carry out their agenda. I hate to bring up Nazi Germany because it&amp;#039;s often used for hyperbole, but Hitler tried the same thing when the Hitler Youth was instated. Besides the overt goal of conscripting young people to carry out the government&amp;#039;s blunders, it also carries with it the goal of indoctrination into socialist ideology. It&amp;#039;s like an Orwellian nightmare coming true. I&amp;#039;d rather have a generation of X-Box worshiping idiots than a generation of Marxist stooges.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/congress-doesn%e2%80%99t-care-about-young-people/#IDComment17922742</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Earth Hour</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17924192</link>
<description>Oops, looks like that whole site was taken down today. I hope it wasn&amp;#039;t because of anything I&amp;#039;ve done. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17924192</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Earth Hour</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17924169</link>
<description>There&amp;#039;s actually a good article about global warming that I linked to in this article. If you click on the Manbearpig image, it will link to it. It&amp;#039;s a fascinating philosophical analysis of Global Warming and scientific inquiry in general. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/30/earth-hour/#IDComment17924169</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Are they trying to fail?</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/20/are-they-trying-to-fail/#IDComment17302961</link>
<description>Thank you. Glad to have another reader. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/20/are-they-trying-to-fail/#IDComment17302961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : To Protect and Harass</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/18/to-protect-and-harass/#IDComment17294691</link>
<description>Yeah, it&amp;#039;s kinda surreal in that way. The way things are going, even Alex Jones&amp;#039; paranoid fantasies might even come true. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/18/to-protect-and-harass/#IDComment17294691</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Scapegoats</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/09/scapegoats/#IDComment16774363</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m right there with you. Cut the social welfare and see if that stems the tide of illegal immigrants. I&amp;#039;d be willing to start a pool and take bets. Might be a good way to earn a few bucks. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/03/09/scapegoats/#IDComment16774363</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Talking the talk</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/02/06/talking-the-talk/#IDComment15697046</link>
<description>Oops! That was a substantial blunder on my part. Kind of a major typo. I fixed it and flushed that little mistake down the memory hole. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/02/06/talking-the-talk/#IDComment15697046</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Libertoad : Talking the talk</title>
<link>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/02/06/talking-the-talk/#IDComment14997343</link>
<description>Like I said, Reagan definitely talked the talk. As far as walking the walk went, he fell pretty far short. He said all the right things and I still find myself inspired by these speeches. It&amp;#039;s a pity that his actions as President didn&amp;#039;t live up to his rhetoric.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.libertoad.com/2009/02/06/talking-the-talk/#IDComment14997343</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>