<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1356193</link>
		<description>Comments by CrashNebula</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Bristol Palin Heads Up &#039;Dancing With the Stars&#039; Cast</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/bristol-palin-heads-up-dancing-with-the-stars-cast/#IDComment96470962</link>
<description>Unless the lobbyist are tossed out of D.C. and the clinching of the nanny state removed no election will make a difference.  The entire framework will remain and after a 4 - 8 year standstill Progressivism / Cronyism will continue.  On a side note it seems that people are so desperate at times they&amp;#039;d elect anything that breathes without fully vetting them or their financial backers.  Presidential election costs climb each cycle usually due to inflation rates; however, the 2008 broke all barriers and it&amp;#039;s predicted that 2012 will be into the multi-billions.  Whoever shall be elected will own much service to those who donated the most. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/bristol-palin-heads-up-dancing-with-the-stars-cast/#IDComment96470962</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Recovery Blunder: Jobs Picture Gets Worse</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/12/recovery-blunder-jobs-picture-gets-worse/#IDComment92669973</link>
<description>Unfortunately, I don&amp;#039;t see much hope even after the elections because of the massive hold that special interest groups have on government that we&amp;#039;ll never be free from their reigns.  If you include those who have been raised under the guise that &amp;quot;they&amp;#039;re owed&amp;quot; by the government, anchor babies for the past couple of decades and the recent aggressive push for amnesty of 20+ million illegals will elections even matter?  Keep in mind that even if conservatives are successful at defeating this progressive push, progressivism will just go back underground diligently working and buying its time until it&amp;#039;s safe for them to resurface with a new plan of domination. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/12/recovery-blunder-jobs-picture-gets-worse/#IDComment92669973</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Recovery Blunder: Jobs Picture Gets Worse</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/12/recovery-blunder-jobs-picture-gets-worse/#IDComment92669951</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Have the Voter Roles, across the nation been PURGED? If not, the deceased and other ineligible voters remain on automatic! &amp;quot;  Neither party will push for this as it has the potential to hurt local and state elections; however, on the bright side with more states pushing to remove the Electoral College from presidential elections only San Francisco, New York City, Chicago and other well-known liberal bastions will be the voice of the people.  (/sarc)  In all honesty there are so many things that must be done both before and after the 2010 / 2012 elections on all levels (local, state and federal) if we hope to peacefully take back control of our nation.  As it stands even if a new congress gets elected will they push to curb their Cadillac benefits?  Will they push to clamp down on voter fraud?  Will they push back on lobbyist?  Will they have the courage to end entitlement programs that are crippling our nation?  Can or should we ever have trust/faith in a politician to uphold their word? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/12/recovery-blunder-jobs-picture-gets-worse/#IDComment92669951</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : FLOTUS Spanish Escapade Gets Taiwan Anime Treatment</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/flotus-spanish-escapade-gets-taiwan-anime-treatment/#IDComment92052289</link>
<description>Only thing off the mark on that story is the overly misunderstood statement from Marie Antoinette as the cake she referred to is burnt batter from the pan or oven. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/flotus-spanish-escapade-gets-taiwan-anime-treatment/#IDComment92052289</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shock Video: Terrorist Training Camp for Children</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shock-video-terrorist-training-camp-for-children/#IDComment91122718</link>
<description>Ah yes, the religion of peace teaching their youth to worship their sun god and proper control of their &amp;quot;boom stick&amp;quot;.  Just think, in a few months lil&amp;#039; Achmed will be learning how to strap on his first vest and make rants against the United States.  Had this been a group of kids at some camp just shooting rimfire rifles and reading from the Bible the news media would release their hounds of hell on the people running said type camp.  I&amp;#039;ll never understand how progressives can conceive that it&amp;#039;s bad for the Unitized States but completely fine with other nations.  Oh wait, it&amp;#039;s their &amp;quot;enlighten&amp;quot; mindset, smug attitudes along with the delusions of power and control that motivate progressives. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shock-video-terrorist-training-camp-for-children/#IDComment91122718</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Authorities Say Racial Bias Behind Connecticut Shooting</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/authorities-say-racial-bias-behind-connecticut-shooting/#IDComment90803790</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s classified as a pistol but the Olympic Arms OA-93 would fit perfectly into a lunchbox size container.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Olympic_Arms_OA-93_Pistol&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Olympic_Arms_OA-93...&lt;/a&gt;   Fun to shoot, loud as hell, worthless at ranges over 50m and dangerous after 100 rounds (overheats and starts to cook-off rounds).  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/authorities-say-racial-bias-behind-connecticut-shooting/#IDComment90803790</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : SC Senate Candidate&#039;s First Attack Ad as Odd as Candidate Himself</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sc-senate-candidates-first-attack-ad-as-odd-as-candidate-himself/#IDComment90595026</link>
<description>Minus the extra ballots, isn&amp;#039;t that part of the ACORN canvasing package? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sc-senate-candidates-first-attack-ad-as-odd-as-candidate-himself/#IDComment90595026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MSNBC Anchor Blames Men for Wall St. Meltdown</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/msnbc-anchor-blames-men-for-wall-st-meltdown/#IDComment89435816</link>
<description>I recall reading an article back in 2008 during the beginning of the market instability that spoke specifically of why more men dominate the stock markets while very few women seek jobs and to a point are &amp;ldquo;less successful&amp;quot; at investing. One of the interesting points made dealt with how men typically become hyper-competitive and at times over ambitious of investments while women tend to invest in what&amp;#039;s considered &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot; investments (think energy markets). While on whole women had stable outcomes in their investments; men however, always trumped women on outcome in general due to their willingness to engage in high-risk investing.   What&amp;#039;s truly at issue here isn&amp;#039;t Wall Street, men, women but our federal government who fell asleep at the wheel of Fannie and Freddy as well as revoking many of the safeguards in preventing financial collapse installed during the Depression of the 1930&amp;#039;s. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/msnbc-anchor-blames-men-for-wall-st-meltdown/#IDComment89435816</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : AZ Sheriff Starts Foundation to Raise Funds For Assault Weapons</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/az-sheriff-starts-foundation-to-raise-funds-assault-weapons/#IDComment89224712</link>
<description>That sediment is exactly why Mexico is in the condition they&amp;#039;re in (politics aside).  When you allow school yard bullies to intimidate you they will always get their way.  You cannot depend on government intervention to curb this action, again examine what&amp;#039;s happened to the police and military within Mexico.  This can happen here as well and will if we take your stance of not being willing to confront this disease. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/az-sheriff-starts-foundation-to-raise-funds-assault-weapons/#IDComment89224712</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : JournoList 2: the TownHouse Listserv?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sahiller/2010/07/27/journolist-2-the-townhouse-listserv/#IDComment89190007</link>
<description>You should add in somewhere in your spot-on description of these nutroot groups &amp;quot;dreams of becoming Che-like&amp;quot; because these clowns for whatever reason love to herald a failed revolutionary.  What leftist forget about Che is he went the way of any useful idiot should; on his knees, sobbing for his life, in an alley with no dignity. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sahiller/2010/07/27/journolist-2-the-townhouse-listserv/#IDComment89190007</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Support for Net Neutrality Weakens as Amazon Backs Compromise</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/07/27/support-for-net-neutrality-weakens-as-amazon-backs-compromise/#IDComment89187479</link>
<description>What&amp;#039;s stupid about these types of bills is that they favor certain insiders within the targeted industries where companies such as Amazon.com think they&amp;#039;ll benefit from the legislation; however, once the framework is passed it can and will be used against them.  Amazon needs to ask Wal-Mart how they like the heat being turned back on them over unions after being stanch supporters of Obamacare.  Even if this administration didn&amp;#039;t use some facet of net neutrality against Amazon who&amp;#039;s to say that the next wouldn&amp;#039;t? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/07/27/support-for-net-neutrality-weakens-as-amazon-backs-compromise/#IDComment89187479</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shirley Sherrod Laments Land Being Sold to White Man</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87868843</link>
<description>Maybe that comment would be better suited if directed at our current congress and adminsitration. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87868843</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shirley Sherrod Laments Land Being Sold to White Man</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87867969</link>
<description>So you&amp;#039;re willing to make excuses for an organization whose sole purpose was the betterment of a particular color by saying &amp;quot;look at who she&amp;#039;s speaking to&amp;quot; is a bit racist.  Why not say that she needs to insert some Ebonics into her rhetoric for the full sale of her point?  The problem is the NAACP waves the banner demanding acceptance and recognition from other races but refuses to recognize and respect other races.  You have to show respect before you earn respect. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87867969</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shirley Sherrod Laments Land Being Sold to White Man</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87867045</link>
<description>Simple question..  How do you explain the part where she says &amp;quot;white lawyer&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;white man&amp;quot; for the person who was going to purchase said land?  Answer: The only reason why anybody of any color would make it a point to highlight the color of a person in a story when speaking to those of the same race is to incite displeasure / disgust within the audience.  White extremist do it and get called on it, Hispanic extremist do it and get called on it, when blacks do it they too should be called on it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87867045</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shirley Sherrod Laments Land Being Sold to White Man</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87865405</link>
<description>Next you&amp;#039;re going to try to feed the 400 years line when we&amp;#039;ve only been a nation for less than 300 years.  To insinuate that blacks had every right to vote in mass for a black candidate because his half-black side &amp;quot;represented&amp;quot; them best is straw-man at best.  The fact is no presidential candidate of any heritage had ever received 90%+ of the votes from those with matching heritage until Obama.  How it can be assumed anything else is naive. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shirley-sherrod-laments-land-being-sold-to-white-man/#IDComment87865405</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Racism at Tea Party Event From Latino Counter-Protester: &#039;You’re Too White To Be American, Go Back</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/racism-at-tea-party-event-from-a-latino-counter-protester-youre-too-white-to-be-american-go-back-to-europe/#IDComment87735674</link>
<description>&amp;quot;There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn&amp;#039;t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.&amp;quot;   Theodore Roosevelt railed about the hyphenated Americans and while I dislike Theodore his statement about immigrants and becoming American I completely agree with. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/racism-at-tea-party-event-from-a-latino-counter-protester-youre-too-white-to-be-american-go-back-to-europe/#IDComment87735674</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Monday Open Thread: Hamilton Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/12/monday-open-thread-hamilton-edition-2/#IDComment86335446</link>
<description>Last week&amp;#039;s romp in California was just another example of their mindset and with progressive leaders stoking the coals of racism and bigotry it&amp;#039;s difficult not to assume there&amp;#039;d be civil unrest even if their idol was removed by ballot.  Time will tell but it starting to seem we might be witnessing O&amp;#039;s million person civilian army amassing. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/12/monday-open-thread-hamilton-edition-2/#IDComment86335446</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judges, Guns and Money: Part III</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86150310</link>
<description>The answer to reaching out to more minorities lies in the methods of their progressive leaders.  Those minorities who are Tea Party Members must unite and work to spreading the word within their communities.  Generally speaking, humans will always gather in groups at the lowest common thread (ethnicity in this case) and will be more receptive to those they feel comfortable around. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86150310</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judges, Guns and Money: Part III</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86149044</link>
<description>Just a random thought....  What would McCain have passed had he been elected President?  I&amp;#039;m not arguing with you about low voter turnout but to insinuate  that had more Republicans and Independents voted for Republican candidates in 2008 we wouldn&amp;#039;t be in this mess is a little naive at best.  I know that McCain wouldn&amp;#039;t play games with our military and current wars, wouldn&amp;#039;t jet set across the globe on an apology tour, wouldn&amp;#039;t have bowed to foreign leaders, or increased racial tensions to the level that they currently are now; however, he lacks severely on economics and border control.  Don&amp;#039;t forget he also was for health care reform (and if I recall started adapting some of the dems &amp;quot;pay for all&amp;quot;), global warming and other progressive mind thoughts.  We&amp;#039;d still be screwed as a nation financially, progressives would still be running around governments masked (thanks to the democrats smug attitude more are willing to show their true selves in the light of day) working diligently at transforming our nation. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86149044</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judges, Guns and Money: Part III</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86146444</link>
<description>Technically the government has been doing it at least since the early 20th century under the National Firearms Act (1934) and US vs. Miller.  Later, in 1968 we were given the Gun Control Act, the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986), Clinton&amp;#039;s famous Assault Weapon Ban in 1994.  Add in the restrictive laws that places such as DC, Chicago, NYC, etc. conjured up and it&amp;#039;s clear to see that we&amp;#039;re more or less on track to follow suit with other progressive nations via UK / Australian methods.  What irks me the most is that groups like NRA proclaim to be pro-gun but helped sculpt the FOPA and AWB in the 80&amp;#039;s and 90&amp;#039;s.  I recall vividly in the 90&amp;#039;s when they were backing rights to &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; handgun and shotgun ownership but couldn&amp;#039;t see, as they said, the &amp;quot;sporting&amp;quot; reason for semi-automatic assault clone weapons and threw them under the bus.  If progressives are successful in dividing up the gun owners ala-smoker style (where cigarette, pipe, chew, and cigar users didn&amp;#039;t unite) the federal government will be able to impose more reaching restrictions. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jwales/2010/07/11/judges-guns-and-money-part-iii/#IDComment86146444</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>