<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/726745</link>
		<description>Comments by Cooltom</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Hillary Clinton: Loughner Motivated by Extreme Political Views</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/12/hillary-clinton-loughner-motivated-by-extreme-political-views/#IDComment121014935</link>
<description>Matilda. The Nazis and Communists were not opposites on the polictical spectrum, they were competitors on the left wing. The first act of the Nazis was to eliminate the communists via the Reichstag fire. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/12/hillary-clinton-loughner-motivated-by-extreme-political-views/#IDComment121014935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Evil Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/11/tuesday-open-thread-evil-edition/#IDComment120669895</link>
<description>OMG... The lead singer of Smashing Pumpkins was the shooter in Arizona... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/11/tuesday-open-thread-evil-edition/#IDComment120669895</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : How to Eliminate &#039;Inflammatory Right-Wing Rhetoric&#039;</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jperren/2011/01/10/how-to-eliminate-inflammatory-right-wing-rhetoric-2/#IDComment120568999</link>
<description> It&amp;#039;s stunning that the languange from the left reactting to the Arizona tragedy make the incoherent ramblings of a nutball almost seem more rational by comparision. Someone should collect the more Palin-deranged quotes, type them up using white text on a black background, and sumbit them to YouTube. Something like this:  Sarah Palin posted a graphic with Con. Giffords district in a crosshair.  Con. Giffords was shot by a gun.  Therefore Palin is responsible for the Tuscon shooting.  All accusations that link Palin in anyway to the shooting make as much sense as saying that J.D. Salinger caused the shooting of John Lennon, The Beatles are responsible for the Sharon Tate murders, and that the real villian in The Manchurian Candidate was the evil manufacturers of playing cards.    </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jperren/2011/01/10/how-to-eliminate-inflammatory-right-wing-rhetoric-2/#IDComment120568999</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Top Union Official Caught on Tape Discussing Voter Fraud</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/10/26/top-union-official-caught-on-tape-discussing-voter-fraud-2/#IDComment106240709</link>
<description>Get Out the Vote is used by both parties. The Dem definiftion of GOTV seems to be &amp;quot;get out the vote.... from the car trunk.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/10/26/top-union-official-caught-on-tape-discussing-voter-fraud-2/#IDComment106240709</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Why Are We Discussing Racism?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sparker/2010/07/23/why-are-we-discussing-racism/#IDComment88447618</link>
<description>Someday the left will find out that if you live by the race card you will eventually die by the race card. Godwin&amp;#039;s Law states that if you resort to calling someone a Nazi you have lost the argument. I propose that ridiculous knee-jerk accusations of racism shall be referred to as violations of the Sherrod Law... or better still the Obama-Holder Law. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 06:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sparker/2010/07/23/why-are-we-discussing-racism/#IDComment88447618</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : 596 immigrants convicted of crimes nabbed in South</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FDGL080&show_article=1#IDComment71572672</link>
<description>What the libs also don&amp;#039;t understand is that the Arizona law is not establishing new law but simply allows existing Federal law to be enforced. It&amp;#039;s not an Arizona law -- it&amp;#039;s a U.S.A. law. Thus the same law can be swiftly implemented in other states. Libs also try to maintain that the Arizona law is unconstitutional because they now deem that immigration is a Federal, not a local issue. Funny how they were on the opposite side of the argument when Sanctuary laws were passed. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FDGL080&show_article=1#IDComment71572672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : 596 immigrants convicted of crimes nabbed in South</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FDGL080&show_article=1#IDComment71572647</link>
<description>Both sides are making too much of the &amp;quot;lawful contact&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable suspiscion&amp;quot; provisions. The police and the writers of the law know all about the legal procedures for both based on prior case law. The left is giving its usual kneejerk reaction but seem not to comprehend that cops know exactly the limits of &amp;quot;lawful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable.&amp;quot; It&amp;#039;s perverse to lay out legal concerns by positing &amp;quot;unlawful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unreasonable&amp;quot; searches and seizures as the likely outcome.  Both sides also are missing the greater benefit of the law that is stated in the first paragraph. It states that no state or local jurisdiction can retain any ordinances or instructions to peace officers that make it ilegal to enforce Federal immigration law. So long to any sanctuary laws or forbidding police to inquire about immigration status or cooperate with ICE.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9FDGL080&show_article=1#IDComment71572647</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Congressman: Murtha\&#039;s intestine damaged in surgery</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DOE3RO1&show_article=1#IDComment56104425</link>
<description>I think a shyster lawyer would have a tough problem trying to bring a malpractice suit against a surgeon at Bethesda in such a newsworthy case. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DOE3RO1&show_article=1#IDComment56104425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White House put on the defensive on health care</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D2ETSG1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726383</link>
<description>&amp;#039;&amp;#039;There has never been a more open process for any legislation in anyone who serves here in the Politburo.&amp;quot; Comrade Pelosi  There. Fixed it for you.  As for Obama&amp;#039;s eight quotes about C-SPAN:  Sen. Allen only said &amp;#039;macacca&amp;#039; ONCE. Joe Wilson only said &amp;#039;You Lie&amp;#039; ONCE. Sen. Lott only praised Sen. Thurmond ONCE. Sarah Palin said &amp;#039;I can see Russia from my living room&amp;#039; ZERO TIMES.  Yet who gets the pass by the MSM? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D2ETSG1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment50726383</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : White House Hypocrisy on Executive Privilege</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/kklukowski/2009/12/05/white-house-hypocrisy-on-executive-privilege/#IDComment45983294</link>
<description>One thing that has been unsaid is why the SS uniforms let the couple in. In the Bush Admin (and almost every other admin) the White House would have their back and commend them for doing their job. Thus, there would hve been no entrance without proper credentials and clearance.  In the Obama, Carter  or Clinton admins they would get chewed out and would face losing their jobs if a well-connected donor was inconvienced.  Even Fox was giving congrats to the WH for tightening procedures. Bunk. The procedures one should employ are obvious and necessary. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Dec 2009 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/kklukowski/2009/12/05/white-house-hypocrisy-on-executive-privilege/#IDComment45983294</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Questions Raised By Flawed Stimulus Job Figures</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/kkane/2009/12/04/questions-raised-by-flawed-stimulus-job-figures/#IDComment45853348</link>
<description>I think someone should go through every project listed on Recovery.Gov and find out the following:  1) How many F.T.E.s (full time employees) have been created. 2) The cost per employee (grant divided by jobs) of each project. 3) How many times the project monies were used to give raises. 4) How many projects have not been started. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/kkane/2009/12/04/questions-raised-by-flawed-stimulus-job-figures/#IDComment45853348</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>