<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1407504</link>
		<description>Comments by George_Sore_Arse</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Editor-In-Chief Joel Pollak On CNN: Breitbart Was A &#039;Happy Warrior&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment306010151</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/effect_an_effect.png&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/effect_an_effect.png&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment306010151</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Editor-In-Chief Joel Pollak On CNN: Breitbart Was A &#039;Happy Warrior&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment306007361</link>
<description>affecting would have been a better choice, but one can use effecting too.      Effect can be used as a verb that essentially means &amp;quot;to bring about,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;to accomplish.&amp;quot; For example, you could say, &amp;quot;Aardvark hoped to effect change within the burrow.&amp;quot;  Breitbart was great at effecting change in politics. You libs really are arses when you find a need to correct grammar and spelling.  do you know how many times I could have corrected libs but didn&amp;#039;t waste my time? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment306007361</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Rick Santorum Reacts To Breitbart&#039;s Death</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/rick-santorum-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305836145</link>
<description>I agree. I loved it.  He was at the right place and the right time.  Standing in front of the media throwing his vindication around.  It was great. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/rick-santorum-reacts-to-andrews-death/#IDComment305836145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Editor-In-Chief Joel Pollak On CNN: Breitbart Was A &#039;Happy Warrior&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment305821249</link>
<description>IMO, Breitbart never wanted to run for office.  He enjoyed effecting politics from the outside where you didn&amp;#039;t have to watch everything you did and said.  And boy was he good at this.  He will be missed. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/editor-in-chief-joel-pollak-on-cnn-breitbart-was-a-happy-warrior/#IDComment305821249</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305480987</link>
<description>He left a great legacy and we will continue the good fight.  God bless Andrew and his family. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305480987</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Carney: Boehner &#039;Dishonest,&#039; Gas Prices Won&#039;t Decrease &#039;Simply By Drilling&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/carney-boehner-dishonest-gas-prices-wont-decrease-simply-by-drilling/#IDComment305103137</link>
<description>Yep. Just like gas prices won&amp;#039;t go up if Iran lobs a bomb at Israel.  Sad to think we have these people in leadership positons in Washington. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/carney-boehner-dishonest-gas-prices-wont-decrease-simply-by-drilling/#IDComment305103137</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Moore: &#039;Operation Hilarity&#039; To Keep Santorum In Race</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moore-operation-hilarity-to-keep-santorum-in-race/#IDComment304037644</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Don&amp;#039;t let the establishment GOP pick our candidate.&amp;quot;  apparently we will let the Democratic establishment pick our candidate.  A vote for Santorum is a vote for Obama.  Wake up people.  Moderates will run away from Santorum.  I know many.  We can&amp;#039;t beat Obama without the moderates. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moore-operation-hilarity-to-keep-santorum-in-race/#IDComment304037644</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Moore: &#039;Operation Hilarity&#039; To Keep Santorum In Race</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moore-operation-hilarity-to-keep-santorum-in-race/#IDComment303950590</link>
<description>Obviously, Santorum is the weaker candidate.   Go Romney.  You are our only hope. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moore-operation-hilarity-to-keep-santorum-in-race/#IDComment303950590</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Adviser On Michigan: &#039;We Have Already Won’</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-adviser-on-michigan-we-have-already-won/#IDComment303342941</link>
<description>Romney 45% Obama 43%...  Obama 45% Santorum 43%  LATEST RASMUSSEN POLL rOMNEY 2012 </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-adviser-on-michigan-we-have-already-won/#IDComment303342941</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Oscar Highlights </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/oscar-highlights/#IDComment302576973</link>
<description>Good.  Now I only wasted two minutes of my time instead of 3-4 hours. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/oscar-highlights/#IDComment302576973</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MoveOn.org Ad Targets Romney In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-org-ad-targets-romney-in-michigan/#IDComment301713347</link>
<description>Exaxtly.  Wake up people!!!! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-org-ad-targets-romney-in-michigan/#IDComment301713347</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : MoveOn.org Ad Targets Romney In Michigan</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-org-ad-targets-romney-in-michigan/#IDComment301712809</link>
<description>Because Romney is a big threat to Obama. Santorum IS NOT. They will tear Santorum apart with all his crazy social conservative quotes.  The moderates will be running away from Santorum as quick as they can.  Romney/ Rubio  or Romeny/ Christie </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/moveon-org-ad-targets-romney-in-michigan/#IDComment301712809</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Spokesman Slips: Obama&#039;s &#039;Radical &lt;i&gt;Islamic&lt;/i&gt; Policies&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297704248</link>
<description>I hear you alacosta.  I am repulsed by Santorum that I may not even vote for him even though Obama is the worst president ever. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297704248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Spokesman Slips: Obama&#039;s &#039;Radical &lt;i&gt;Islamic&lt;/i&gt; Policies&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297597824</link>
<description>State health care is totally different from national health care.  The first thing Romney will do is overturn Obamacare. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297597824</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Spokesman Slips: Obama&#039;s &#039;Radical &lt;i&gt;Islamic&lt;/i&gt; Policies&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297566202</link>
<description>People. We are not voting for a theologian.  We are voting for a president.  Romney is conservative on fiscal issues.  It&amp;#039;s the economy, studpid! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-spokesman-slips-obamas-radical-islamic-policies/#IDComment297566202</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump: No Better Gift For Dems Than Unelectable Santorum </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-no-better-gift-for-dems-then-unelectable-santorum/#IDComment297545854</link>
<description>I am a huge fiscal conservative that does not vote on social issues. That being said, having Santorum as the GOP candidate saps all my excitability about the election out of my system. Here in the midwest, there are a lot of fiscal conservatives who are socially liberal. Santorum will bring about 4 more years of Obama and we will have the social right to thank for it. I can barely get myself to vote for someone so far rght out of the mainstream on social issues.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-no-better-gift-for-dems-then-unelectable-santorum/#IDComment297545854</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Trump: No Better Gift For Dems Than Unelectable Santorum </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-no-better-gift-for-dems-then-unelectable-santorum/#IDComment297545469</link>
<description>I am a huge fiscal conservative that does not vote on social issues.  That being said,  having Santorum as the GOP candidate saps all my excitability about the election out of my system. Here in the midwest, there are a lot of fiscal conservatives who are socially liberal.  Santorum will bring about 4 more years of Obama and we will have the social right to thank for it.  I can barely get myself to vote for someone so far rght out of the mainstream on social issues.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/trump-no-better-gift-for-dems-then-unelectable-santorum/#IDComment297545469</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Santorum Surge: Two Problems for Conservatives</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge-two-problems-for-conservatives/#IDComment295468319</link>
<description>It doesn&amp;#039;t matter who is in congress when you have a president that uses every trick to circumvent congress.  We need Obama out of the White House and right now Mitt is the one that can do it.  There will not be enough support of Santorum bc his social conservatism is out of the park. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/17/the-santorum-surge-two-problems-for-conservatives/#IDComment295468319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Wisconsin Public Employees Praise Gov. Walker&#039;s Reforms In New Ad</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/wisconsin-public-employees-praise-gov-walkers-reforms-in-new-ad/#IDComment294393897</link>
<description>libs won&amp;#039;t like this video </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/wisconsin-public-employees-praise-gov-walkers-reforms-in-new-ad/#IDComment294393897</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : WH Official On Budget: Obama &#039;Not Afraid&#039; To Act If Congress Won&#039;t </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/wh-official-on-budget-obama-not-afraid-to-act-if-congress-wont/#IDComment294179077</link>
<description>All Obama needs is to appoint a budget czar. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/wh-official-on-budget-obama-not-afraid-to-act-if-congress-wont/#IDComment294179077</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>