IntenseDebate - PeterBeater

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: Rees-Mogg - “... · 0 replies · +1 points

"For anyone watching the debate they would have noticed JRM happily ready to give away all workers rights."

So what if that is his policy? IF it is. It would have to get through Parliament, over which you would have democratic control. Whereas at the moment it is dictated by a foreign institution over which you have virtually none.

It is really not hard to understand, you know.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: Rees-Mogg - “... · 1 reply · +1 points

That is untrue. We were told by the government multiple times that we would be worse off.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: "She said the s... · 1 reply · +1 points

So the only action has been Project Fear.

Great ...

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 0 replies · +1 points

Anyone with a brain should have known in 2016 that May was entirely unfit to be PM & leader. Anyone with half a brain should have known in 2017 that she was entirely unfit to be PM & leader. And now it is a literal no-brainer. The fact that Tory MPs do not realise this and cannot summon the courage to remove her is a staggering indictment of their quality. Goodman is clearly an intelligent man - no wonder he bailed out of Parliament if it meant spending all day in the company of such pygmies.

It occurs to me that May obviously has mental issues, and leaving her in power is a breach of the party's duty-of-care towards her.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 1 reply · +1 points

Balls. Utter balls.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 0 replies · +1 points

… which will solve nothing. Even many Remainers agree that.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 1 reply · +1 points

I fully support all court challenges in support of established law, in this case the EU Withdrawal Act.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, chum.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 3 replies · +1 points

You mean without a vote? I don't think that would survive a court challenge.

In theory, anyway ...

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - MEANINGFUL VOTE PULLE... · 0 replies · +1 points

Plenty of people are disputing it. Therefore it is not "indisputably". By definition.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, chum.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Andrew Gimson's Common... · 0 replies · +1 points

Indeed they are.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with PeterBeater

People I'm following

PeterBeater