en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1402258 Comments by CodeThePlumber http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.39b03b955f1332371c4687bac99e4ea2.691&show_article=1#IDComment132103232 Can we please have a link to the original article? I would expect the "opinion piece" link to do be just that, but it is just an internal Breitbart search. Searching the global times for the quoted quotes results in zero... but that is using google, so who knows how those lovebirds are meshing today. Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:05:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.39b03b955f1332371c4687bac99e4ea2.691&show_article=1#IDComment132103232 http://biggovernment.com/jmsimpson/2010/11/28/breaking-power-to-the-people-repeal-amendment-gaining-strength/#IDComment112669709 It's not written that way now. Why do you think a rewrite will be read correctly in 100 yrs? It is not as if our writing ability was lacking and it is improved at this point. Rather, it is a cognitive issue. Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:30:15 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jmsimpson/2010/11/28/breaking-power-to-the-people-repeal-amendment-gaining-strength/#IDComment112669709 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111317090 If you want constitutional, you need to draft Judge Napolitano. There's not a Cpt Ahab capable of winning that battle throwing liberal harpoons. I'm almost surprised they haven't tried locking him in a box, yet. The man carries so much brass everywhere, I can't believe he gets through TSA. It's not like they can't see it. Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:40:56 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111317090 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111315184 Michael Vick is a felon, and though he can't vote, he can run. Not sure he's that popular though. Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:32:31 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111315184 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111310837 You seem to know less than zero about the man. Listen to his speeches at least a little before presuming his motivations, declaring his actions as racist, and hoping he does the right thing. For the record, he calls it (paraprhased) slavery, a methodically laid out modern day plantation to create a permanent, if financially incapable, illegitimate child-having, please sir may I have some more, how we dun get stuck in this mess, can you save me mr democrat, voting block. He goes further and says it is a deliberate act to create a result, total control and dependence, crushing the individualist spirit of man. His language is much stronger than yours on the subject. You must be a communist or something. We'll see how you act in the future /sarc. Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:12:51 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jloudon/2010/11/20/tea-party-president-in-2012/#IDComment111310837 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105271916 Uh, we trusted the demand side with those fools currently squatting on the supply that you want to let off. It only works if you kick them out of the supply and then keep them out of the demand until we know we're winning the game. That's why foreclosures F up your credit in the first place. You just screwed up the market, so you gotta sit out a few years. We do need to gut the supply market, by gutting these freeloaders from their homes N-O-W, not by doing neverending paperwork reviews. You missed 6 payments? Out you go. No "did they send you 5 notices or 6?" That's why nobody ended up being helped by the Obama loans restructuring. The good person that just got in a little deep was a myth. Willing theives, and those too stupid to own. Those are the only categories. All parties should be accountable, not just in the corporate and political sector, but in private dealings too. You cannot allow these shenanigans to have no enduring penalty. See bankruptcy law and repeat bankruptcy. Madness. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:35 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105271916 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105270366 Homeprices still need to dive almost 20% as a simple necessity relative to median income. Current homeowners who can't do math cannot not do math their whole life waiting for prices to rise up to a fantasy level again. "Be careful what you wish for." Hell, open excel and see what happens to your sell value when interest rates hit say 8%. You might want to go ahead and get selling now if you're concerned about prices going down by market pressures. With the FED planning on doing a little inflation game soon, you might want to look at rates up until '81. Your house will be worthless until incomes catch up.. Have you seen the unemployment numbers and thought "Geez, I'll bet a big COL increase is coming soon, maybe a bonus too!" I doubt it. The good news is that while you're holding a worthless house, it will be hard to kick you out if you can't pay and eventually income should catch up and someone will buy it... from your kids. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:38:49 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105270366 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105269176 The people who would benefit would not be current owners? Fantastic! They are not owners, nor are they "owners in the making" if they are foreclosure victims of any kind. They are deadbeat debtors. Get them out and let responsible people in. Get them out before they steal the fixtures, the cabinets, destroy the plumbing, let their dogs crap on the floor, etc like I've seen. Look, with cars, someone shows up and your car just ain't there in the morning. You know why, because they sent you bills. This is with 10x-20x the value of a car. A SWAT team and a moving truck is in order more than a national solution to save the irresponsible at the expense of everyone else. I don't care what major city you lived in. If you bought a home between 2002 and 2007, you are a fool and paid a fool's price. You didn't look at the price compared to medain incomes and ask WTF?! The math did not work, at all. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:30:48 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105269176 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105267498 This is a socialist idea, where blame is shared and future risk unidentified(future lsosses shared again) not a Tea Party one. Pffft. Property ownership is not a right, it is a privilege that comes with responsibilities. First among them is paying your mortgage. How many of these fictitious good people didn't have the money for their mortgage, but somehow maintained the property beautifully.. or did they fall into neglect, ruining any chance of recovering losses on the loan? Hint: go visit foreclosures in your area. Bring societal blinders, a barf-bag, and a gas mask. Even in the richest county, USA... the experience is not even safe for your health. I know this firsthand. People should get out from under and into an apartment, where they might make ends meet... and maybe someday learn to save and buy property at a price they can afford. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:19:36 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105267498 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105267208 My objection is well grounded. I sat there for the better part of a decade living in lousy apartments because I had half a brain. I saw that the market was retardedly upside down. We're talking 30%-100% out of bounds, not "oh I was doing the right thing". I waited for this to play out so I could pick up a home at a correct price. Why should the SOB's that can't do basic accounting, have no basis for responsible behavior, be treated as if they did anything less than spend beyond their means and collectively tank a large portion of the economy. Why allow they same stupid borrowers to re-enter the bidding pool knowing they just bet the house, literally, and lost? To the contrary, I'd like to see them all in debtors prisons. Anyone that did anything more than buy say 5% beyond their means and lost a job should be made an example of, not forgiven and put on equal footing to artificially raising prices again because they can't do basic accounting. We know from experience these people can't do basic accounting. They may be your friends, and they may be smart, but we know they cannot do basic accounting. Period. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:17:38 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mwarstler/2010/10/19/foreclosure-fraud-can-save-us-economy/#IDComment105267208 http://bigpeace.com/dwest/2010/09/27/americas-bad-date-with-the-mullahs/#IDComment101228286 What? No. The British would not have won by trying to relate to us. That was the whole point. We did not relate to them. We did no longer harbor any desire to realate to them. We beat them by fighting dirty and enlisting France. Indeed, there is a parallel. We need to positively crush Iran, and fight as dirty as they do on the ground. You want IED's to wound and disfigure our youth? That's cool, we can make more than you can. You want a big attack on our soil? We can eclipse that 100x fold. We are not there just to find some bad guys. They only need to trust if they confront us, they will die 100% of the time. We are in fact there to change them, otherwise they would be dead or we wouldn't be there. It's very naive to think we aren't there for that exact purpose, and failing miserably at it. Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:38:00 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/dwest/2010/09/27/americas-bad-date-with-the-mullahs/#IDComment101228286 http://bigjournalism.com/gloudon/2010/09/21/about-that-endowed-by-their-creator-omission-mr-president/#IDComment100416611 Oh, for the love of their Creator, what crap is this I just read? Please quickly edit the fact that the author used the wrong text as well, over and over. the Creator? The Creator?! Maybe in the bible, but in the Declaration it's "their Creator." Make the mistake once? Nah, the author cut and pasted, or must I be forced to think up the only possible explanations and list them... This is unfit quality control. Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:18:06 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/gloudon/2010/09/21/about-that-endowed-by-their-creator-omission-mr-president/#IDComment100416611 http://bigpeace.com/teamb/2010/09/21/true-lies-the-paradox-of-debating-shariah/#IDComment100235524 Indeed, and that's why the whole "You lie" thing was such a faux pax. Were he addressing the politicians in the room, indeed it was an insufferable lie. However, he was addressing the people, and lying to us is completely acceptable so long as it furthers a political obligation. Taqiyya among the most powerful is how we do things now. American politics is already nearing sharia compliance. Why, it's only a matter of time before we get these two meet and see what a great match has been made on their behalf. If not, well, the beatings (compliant of course) will reform the offending party. Aah, the rosey glow of peace. Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:38:00 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/teamb/2010/09/21/true-lies-the-paradox-of-debating-shariah/#IDComment100235524 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/09/21/why-is-col-allen-west-not-a-media-star/#IDComment100208848 1Tax Dollar = 1 Vote. You cannot vote to raise your own taxes, but you can vote to lower them. It'll work out over time and the beast will starve. It's sort of like how Ron Paul is a libertarian that grabs money for his voters. He is doing his job... but he should be disallowed. You can vote in a tax and spender, but he should only be allowed to tax you alone and benefit someone else. Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:32:05 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/09/21/why-is-col-allen-west-not-a-media-star/#IDComment100208848 http://bigpeace.com/teamb/2010/09/21/true-lies-the-paradox-of-debating-shariah/#IDComment100202472 Did Breitbart pay google a little extra or something? Here I am reading about the obligation within Islam to lie and to my right on the screen, Google has decided that the most relevant advertising given the conetent of the article would be a site where I might find myself a single muslim woman... as if there were ever less than honest representations or obligations to embellish the truth on such a site. Google ads are not only smart, they have become witty. Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:43:53 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/teamb/2010/09/21/true-lies-the-paradox-of-debating-shariah/#IDComment100202472 http://bigpeace.com/estakelbeck/2010/08/02/lt-general-jerry-boykin-takes-on-the-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment90378138 The history of the West should have been enough to propel them forward out of the 7th century. Nope, it's looking easier to bring us back to the 10th century. If we go back, let's at least keep antibiotics, oh and cellphones(just not blackberries). They are great inventions that allow me to get emergency care should I accidentally expose a cut to sewage tainted bathing waters while manually working the fields as a dhimmi. It's a win for my overlords if I live another day to serve. Think of the fruits of how many slaves they could have had if they simply had antibiotics to administer to the castrated africans that perished. This should be a no brainer for them. Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:42:49 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/estakelbeck/2010/08/02/lt-general-jerry-boykin-takes-on-the-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment90378138 http://bigpeace.com/estakelbeck/2010/08/02/lt-general-jerry-boykin-takes-on-the-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment90372844 "We have freedom of religion in this country." No we do not. We have a congress prohibited from making laws regarding the establishment and free exercise fo religion. Somewhere along the line, after WWII, some bozo judges decided that this should be incorporated down to the states and locales. The colonies did not have any lack of institutionalized religion at the local and state levels. That would lead one to believe they were right, current interpretation completely off-base. How do you protect free exercise of something that necessarily requires you not protect yourself, nor protect other religions because it is a basic value to be "freely exercised" that others must conform or die? Unpossible. Declassify it as a religion, reclassify under international state-politics, and defend away. Jefferson would approve. Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:27:38 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/estakelbeck/2010/08/02/lt-general-jerry-boykin-takes-on-the-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment90372844 http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/07/22/journolist-they-are-liberals-first-journalists-second/#IDComment88316296 It was such coincidental timing that it only took a couple trillion dollars just "moving" overnight to start the slide on the right date. Also, on the delay the inevitible side, the FED loaned still unnamed institutions a few trillion to keep appearances normal over the year leading up to that day. Nothing to to see here then, and nothing you'd probably want know now either. Better just plug your nose and breathe shallow. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:16:00 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/07/22/journolist-they-are-liberals-first-journalists-second/#IDComment88316296 http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/07/22/journolist-they-are-liberals-first-journalists-second/#IDComment88313617 A big reason why he won is best answered by a question. How and why did a nearly bankrupt campaign get a shot in the arm and take the republican nomination? Look, the credit crunch was no surprise. You could see it coming in 2005, with EASE. If you were sitting on an unpopular leader, no congressional majorities, two never-ending wars, and knew the country was going to get severely slapped econimically... why in the hell would you want to WIN? It would ensure that you would never win again for decades. The dems would still be holding congress, and they would still be tanking us. Pres McCan't would have just been the whipping boy. At this point, it's easier to start fresh, after the dems demo the building themselves. We need a cleaner argumentative slate, starting all the way back to constitutional boundaries and intent. All the side arguments need to become as petty as they are. Gay marriage? That's a pressing issue for the federal level of government, to be a focal debate for presidency? Whether 200 prisoners are tortured out of the country or mirandized? Seriously? That's a presidential topic now? Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:06:59 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/07/22/journolist-they-are-liberals-first-journalists-second/#IDComment88313617 http://bigjournalism.com/retracto/2010/07/21/correction-request-media-matters-for-america-incorrectly-labels-two-full-video-excerpts-as-heavily-edited/#IDComment88308402 The way this has played out is no surprise. Honestly, I don't buy the "I don't have it" line on the original. I think think it was perfectly executed. We know they cannot think, so they will sever her instead of embarrassing the real target, the NAACP. Hell, the NAACP will speak out against her. Then we'll release the full video. NAACP will have egg on it's face, as will the administration. All we need to do is post two unedited snippets and stand back. Maybe Breitbart just got lucky, but I think too highly of him to think it was anything short of a brilliant setup. Welcome to the United States of America, heavily edited with a lost context. Nobody knows where we came from or where we're going, and any inconvenient truths, when documented, are really just heavily edited. ProTip: Breitbart needs to distinguish LOUDLY the diff between editing and altering. The video is unaltered, except for format. All news clips and 99% of interviews are "heavily edited" even if they are still unaltered. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:48:33 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/retracto/2010/07/21/correction-request-media-matters-for-america-incorrectly-labels-two-full-video-excerpts-as-heavily-edited/#IDComment88308402