ChrysT17
49p10 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
8 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Potential class-action... · 3 replies · +2 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: Supreme Cour... · 0 replies · +1 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - South Carolina same-se... · 1 reply · +2 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Ninth Circuit to hear ... · 0 replies · +2 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Equality news round-up... · 0 replies · +3 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Sixth Circuit Court of... · 0 replies · +11 points
How we can still in 2014 NOT be a suspect class deserving heightened scrutiny is beyond me. It's only because animus toward & discrimination against us are so pervasive that they're not seen for what they are - a case of not seeing the forest for the trees. When & if the courts treat lgbt cases as a suspect class deserving heightened scrutiny, we will start winning all our cases & the battle for equality will be over.
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Further briefing sough... · 1 reply · +1 points
Though it might be unusual or even unprecedented for SCOTUS to overturn as many lower court rulings as we have seen in the last year's winning streak, I imagine it is also unusual if not unprecedented for them to overturn the laws of 31 states - 28 of them constitutional amendments - and that may weigh on the minds of the liberal justices otherwise sympathetic to ME.
With this publicly-expressed hesitancy on the part of at least 3 of the liberal justices, and other concerns that belong in another thread, I wonder if some people may have become overconfident that ME nationally in 1 or 2 years is a near certainty? I hope, as I overheard one person predict, we're going to be throwing a REALLY big party in June, 2015, but I'm not convinced.
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Colorado appeals court... · 0 replies · +3 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Colorado appeals court... · 0 replies · +6 points
9 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Colorado appeals court... · 6 replies · +2 points
I would also be interested in whether commenters on this site think the SCOTUS granting of stay in the Kitchen case might indicate that they plan to uphold the state bans - otherwise, the stay makes no sense in light of the usual test for stays: the plaintiffs in marriage equality cases are clearly suffering more harm, & if they are likely to win at the Supreme Court, then what would justify the stay? Unless the justices know we're not going to win there? Please tell me I'm wrong & why.