<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/273952</link>
		<description>Comments by ChrisA9</description>
<item>
<title>Video Game News &amp; Reviews - Kombo.com : How Barack Obama Can Bring the Change the Video Game Industry Needs</title>
<link>http://www.kombo.com/article.php?artid=12028#IDComment11931540</link>
<description>In regards to the &amp;quot;used market&amp;quot; debate, I find it interesting that no one has brought up the &amp;quot;First Sale Doctrine.&amp;quot; I included the Wikipedia definition below.   The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1908 and subsequently codified in the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 109. The doctrine allows the purchaser to transfer (i.e., sell or give away) a particular lawfully made copy of the copyrighted work without permission once it has been obtained. That means that copyright holder&amp;#039;s rights to control the change of ownership of a particular copy end once that copy is sold, as long as no additional copies are made. This doctrine is also referred to as the &amp;quot;first sale rule&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;exhaustion rule&amp;quot;.  Therefore, there is nothing &amp;quot;lawfully&amp;quot; wrong with the &amp;quot;used market&amp;quot; per say.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kombo.com/article.php?artid=12028#IDComment11931540</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>