Carpenter13

Carpenter13

62p

24 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

12 years ago @ Big Journalism - Johnny Depp-Gate: What... · 0 replies · +6 points

This shows once again how the establishment works. The top politicians, the media, Hollywood bosses, all cooperating and going to the same parties with each other. "Schmoozing" they would call it, as they always make sure to sprinkle their language (and TV shows) with Yiddish expressions. It's one of their little things, you see. Just like dressing up or covering up a story here and there.

13 years ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Pro-Democracy Revoluti... · 0 replies · +2 points

It's the Washington-Tel Aviv empire that seeks control of the Middle East though - any regime there that keeps down objections to the Palestinian genocide is favored, while those who have provided financial or diplomatic help to the Palestinian resistance - Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan - are targeted. That is the deciding factor that shows why some dictators are supported while others are not.

It is not an American empire. Most Americans are dupes, just like most West Europeans, East Europeans, Middle Easterners, and so on. If the facts about the NWO control in the Middle East and Central Asia - from Marocco to Pakistan - were presented to the American people, and they were allowed to vote on which policies to keep, then you would see the control crumble.

But as it is most Americans don't know what is going on. And so they are easily duped when al-Qaeda bombs an embassy somewhere, duped into believing that "They hate us for our freedom."

13 years ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Pro-Democracy Revoluti... · 2 replies · +4 points

"I also doubt that these countries, if their governments do fall, will diverge all that far from US policy. They need a patron" --Ah, is that how the neocon followers make excuses for the Washington-Tel Aviv axis now? "It's all right that we control these nations to muffle Arab objections to the Palestinian genocide. Because they need a patron!" And what do they need a "patron" for? To receive foreign aid, is that it? The money ends up in the pockets of the NWO crowd and their Zionist advisors, like André Azoulay, the advisor to the oppressive Maroccan king. Egypt receives more U.S. foreign aid than any other country - except Israel of course, the #1 money recipient - so that it will starve the Gaza Strip, isolate the Palestinians, and oppress the Muslim Brotherhood (NOT a radical organization, but run mostly by academics). Yes. But that aid has done nothing to improve Egypt. What would really improve their lot would be a war on the corruption that chokes competition in the marketplace in favor of the NWO's favored oligarchs. Egypt needs to provide some basic services for the poorest and get the market economy going without corruption favoring the regime-loyal oligarchs. And for the sake of all, they need to open the doors to the Gaza Strip. Shiver, neocons and other Zionists.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - Withdrawing Consent · 0 replies · +3 points

Exactly my thought. Mubarak and Ben Ali were pro-Israel, pro-NWO, and therefore received support and financial treats. The government in Lebanon is the opposite. The pro-Israeli, pro-NWO protesters in Lebanon have more in common with the protesters in Serbia mentioned earlier in the story - who were funded by NED and other neocon organizations, just like the the organizations that committed coups in Georgia, Ukraine and elsewhere.

This is "managed democracy," the new dictatorship. Tyrants are smarter these days, paying lip service to the religion of Democracy to gain legitimacy, just like they used to pay lip service to various other religions in the past. Same in the West. Real opposition parties, those who want to stop mass immigration and want to leave the EU, are held down in a thousand different ways, their members' careers destroyed - but Democracy is still touted as the law of the land. The oppressed parties are anti-democratic you see, so you don't have to give them any space to answer to the slander.

When West Europeans are as poor as the Algerians and Egyptians, there will be more revolts. When an NWO stronghold like Egypt can be toppled, that does not bode well for the Washington-Tel Aviv axis.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - The Revolutionary Wave · 2 replies · +3 points

"global capitalism" - you managed to get that in there, did you? Bravo. And what is this "global capitalism"? The fact that there are private companies in every country that doesn't want to commit economic suicide? I am sure you hate that, the thought that people who are not you make more money.

Leftists are hilarious. Their socialist lies bring about economic ruin, and they blame it on "capitalism". What caused the financial crisis in the U.S. was the Community Reinvestment Act, imposed on the banks by Jimmy Carter and then made more severe by Bill Clinton. Socialists like Obama stopped a proposed congressional investigation of the Act in 2003. Obama, of course, was an agent of ACORN, the Black "watchdog group" that grew fat from blaming banks of "racism" if they didn't hand out subprime loans to minorities for too-low interest rates. This was part and parcel of the CRA strategy, ACORN and groups like it were funded by tax money to do exactly that.

The socialist United States and the socialist Israel - it was based on socialism and has remained so ever since, being full of Jewish Marxists - control the world and impose the New World Order, where all nations are centralized and controlled by their leftist policies, where there is mass immigration to all Western countries, and nationalism is forbidden - except for Israel of course. Socialists like you, bogi666 (cool with that 666, "mark of the beast!", right?) like to focus only on the fact that there are international companies. LOL As if that would be the cause for the New World Order, and not the socialist politicians who erase our borders, making it possible for some companies to outsource Western jobs to low-wage countries, which forces the rest to do the same or go bankrupt. But I agree, let's stop the international job market - give back the industries to us Westerners, and leave the Third Worlders to create their own jobs. No more "global capitalism," but I doubt the Third Worlders are any happier that way. And you, bogi666, will lose your bogeyman.

I am glad the Egyptians are rising against this Washington-Tel Aviv-loyal regime. It weakens the NWO grip, and anything that does so helps nationalism in the West, which is rising and will sweep away the NWOers who control us through centralization and mass immigration. Go, Egyptians! Nationalism everywhere is a good thing. Stand up for Egypt against the New World Order.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - The Road to National S... · 0 replies · +7 points

The people in power include too many Zionists to care. The neocons argued for invading Iraq from the mid-1990s because Iraq was one of the few Middle Eastern countries to stand up for the Palestinian resistance. Iraq gave money to the families of suicide bombers, and stood up for the Palestinians in Arab council. So Iraq had to be destroyed, even though it was a secular, pro-western, anti-Islamist state that had always been loyal to the United States, thanks to Saddam Hussein.

Afghanistan had to be invaded first to make a connection to al-Qaeda in the American people's minds. That was even admitted by people in the White House. Paul Wolfowitz called for an invasion of Iraq right after 9/11, not Afghanistan.

Invading a staunch American ally, ruining America's standing in the entire region - all for Israel's occupation of the remaining 22 percent of Palestinian land. And skewing U.S. foreign policy in the entire Middle East to push for the Iraq/Afghan invasions, and Israel's occupation. It is true, this IS national suicide. You can't control this vast part of the world forever, not without bleeding financially, and for real. Resistance will develop, even among these autocratic, controlled states. It is only a matter of time before the Israel-Washington axis is driven back.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - Regime of Unreason · 0 replies · -1 points

No one mentions the obvious: that Russian civilians are killed because CHECHEN civilians have been killed for TWO DECADES. When Russian "soldiers" invaded Groznyj, they were let loose on a rampage of murder and rape. They threw grenades into basements where families were hiding. They gangraped women, as Russian soldiers always do. In one case they raped a Chechen woman in the street, then put her between two madrasses that they set on fire, then watched her burn to death.

To kill these soldiers and their equally criminal relatives - Russians, being one of the most sadistic people on earth, love murder and rape as long as it doesn't happen to them - seems to me exactly what a Chechen should do. "Terrorism," the media now call it, but no mention of the Russian terrorism against Chechnya for two decades.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - What's Going on in Tun... · 6 replies · +13 points

"the AntiWar faction of the libertarian movement"? If you are not against the wars for Zionist control of the last remaining resisting nations in the Middle East, then you are not a libertarian, just another neocon sock puppet. Go send love letters to Paul Wolfowitz and stop pretending that you are on the West's side. Neocon lovers are only on Israel's side, supporting the destruction of borders, centralized control, mass immigration for the West, but of course racial purity for the "Jewish State". All carefully wrapped in talk about "democracy."

I see your name links to "Libertarian Republican," a neocon website that raves against ISLAMOFASCISM. Right there on its front page. I can't believe anyone is so stupid as to think people are fooled by the ISLAMOFASCIST label any longer. But stick to it Eric Dondewitz, it exposes who you are.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - What's Going on in Tun... · 2 replies · +13 points

Whoever said Islamists are libertarians? Nice spin, Eric D. But one thin the Taliban, the Iranians, the Iraqi rebels, the Muslim Brotherhood and Hezbollah are NOT is globalists who want to erase all borders in favor of a leftist, centralizing police state. And THAT is why it is much better for Westerners if the resistance fighters win against the Israel/Washington axis and its puppets than the other way around.

Islamists are not our enemies, they are resistance fighters against the globalist new world order who express their resistance through religion - the way all sides express themselves in the Middle East. In the West, the resistance is expressed in libertarianism or various other forms. Different methods for different peoples.

13 years ago @ News From Antiwar.com - President Flees as Tun... · 2 replies · +6 points

The spin will be that Democracy breaks out because of the "pressure on oppressive despots like Saddam Hussein, Ahmadinejad and the Taliban." The neocons will pretend that they caused this. Especially if protests now spread from Tunisia to Algeria, Morocco, Libya or Egypt.

The truth is that all these states except Libya are pro-Washington and run in accordance with the Israeli lobby's wishes. A few hints:

--Egypt receives more U.S. foreign aid than any other country - except Israel of course. This rich Arab state gets the money in order to work in concert with Israel on oppressing the Palestinians, by for example keeping the border closed in order to starve the Gaza Strip. The Egyptian de facto dictator Hosni Mubarak oppresses the anti-Israeli Islamic Brotherhood, making it impossible for them to win elections.

--Algeria turned into a pro-Washington dictatorship through a coup in 1992. This received neocon backing. The year before that, the highly popular Islamic Salvation Front had won the democratic elections fair and square. But democracy is only allowed when a pro-Israeli, globalist-funded party wins.

--Morocco has been pro-Washington and pro-Israel since the French colonials withdrew, leaving behind the Moroccan king as a puppet. He even has a top advisor who is Jewish, André Azoulay, currently the head of the "Anna Lindh Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue between Cultures", one of those countless globalist organizations that funnel money and control the public debate. The Moroccan king oppresses dissent in many ways, forcing dissenters to leave the country. (Your career is ruined, for example.)

The neocons fear real democracy in Maghreb, Arab northern Africa, because they rely on pro-Israeli dictators and de facto dictators to control the Middle East from Morocco to Pakistan. The countries that object are starved financially or bombed and invaded. (Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan.)