<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/302382</link>
		<description>Comments by Canto28</description>
<item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: This morning\&#039;s death threat</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027242.php#IDComment30851842</link>
<description>This Koran 111:1-5 about Muhammad&amp;#039;s hatred of Abu Lahab has always impressed me as one of many clear indications to a sane person that the Koran is a direct fabrication of Muhammad himself. This is not the way the Creator of the marvelous &amp;amp; intricate universe would talk. This is clearly human vindictiveness showing its very human traits. Mo was very annoyed by Abu Lahab telling people not to listen to him because he&amp;#039;s nuts and obviously this &amp;quot;revelation&amp;quot;  from Allah was no more than Mo&amp;#039;s vengeance lust.      &lt;b&gt;Again, I say there is no excuse for an intelligent person to be a Muslim. &lt;/b&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027242.php#IDComment30851842</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\&#039;s Islamic Defenders Front: &quot;Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30647267</link>
<description>A girl gets raped and the Muslim family thinks she and the family honor is trashed and she must be killed.    &lt;b&gt;Islam causes a kind of brain death.&lt;/b&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30647267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: &quot;Moderate&quot; Fatah applauds as heroes jihadists who killed 37 Israeli civilians</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027130.php#IDComment29542549</link>
<description>Obama and Hillary love Fatah, and since Fatah was having budgetary shortfalls they transferred another $200,000,000. of US taxpayer money - in spite of the deep recession - directly to them to show they care. Not much of this was made in the MSM, which also cares. It&amp;#039;s a crazy world. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027130.php#IDComment29542549</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Shoe Bomber sues to resume his jihad from prison, Obama caves in</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027071.php#IDComment28827634</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Ajaj tried to get his &amp;ldquo;training kit&amp;rdquo; to Yousef, which included videotapes and notes he had taken on bomb-making while attending a terrorist camp on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.&amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt;  This is why Western states should lock up for life all who return from such camps. IMO people like Reid should have been long ago executed for the horrendous crime he attempted - no credit given for having failed. We simply need stronger laws to dispose of these despicable terrorists instead of spending taxpayer money to keep them alive, healthy &amp;amp; safe.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027071.php#IDComment28827634</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: 200 young would-be suicide bombers, willing to kill their parents, rescued in Pakistan</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027054.php#IDComment28608616</link>
<description>Just so! The rejection of childhood innocence was codified in Islam when 53 year old &amp;quot;perfect man&amp;quot; Muhammad raped of his nine year old &amp;quot;bride&amp;quot;. In the New Testament childhood innocence was exalted, yet for Muslims it is the Christian &amp;amp; Jews who have corrupted the written holy words of prophets. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027054.php#IDComment28608616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: UK: Non-Muslim female police officers will wear headscarves when entering mosques</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027046.php#IDComment28542466</link>
<description>The Brits are such suckers for the Muslim &amp;quot;sensibilities&amp;quot; scam. It&amp;#039;s not that Muslims are so bothered by the few times a woman police officer might come into a mosque on duty showing her hair, this is just part of getting the British infidel use to accommodating what Muslims say they must have. Give in on a seemingly little matter here and then there and after a while it just becomes natural to just give in to Islamic culture - esp. more &amp;amp; more Sharia eventually. Ultimately it&amp;#039;s not your respectful behavior they want, they want your soul. Brits need to see the film &amp;quot;Invasion Of The Body Snatchers&amp;quot; while thinking about Islam. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027046.php#IDComment28542466</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Time to buy more rockets: U.S. gives $200 million to Palestinian Authority</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027015.php#IDComment28284194</link>
<description>Disgusting. Politicians get elected and they and their cronies get control of your money. Naturally they&amp;#039;re generous with other people&amp;#039;s (taxpayer&amp;#039;s) money. This is how they build their international status at no cost to themselves - such a deal! If Obama wants to impress the Muslim world that he&amp;#039;s on their side, why he has Hilary gladly give hundreds of millions of taxpayer&amp;#039;s money to Palestinians who will celebrate just as hard at the next 9-11 and work harder at destroying Israel.    The Palestinians are not America&amp;#039;s friends. They hate infidel America for supporting Israel and I don&amp;#039;t think most Americans approve of this absurd largess especially during a deep recession - not that Obama cares what Americans want. His Wonderfulness will decide what&amp;#039;s best and lately he&amp;#039;s very sympathetic to Muslims who hate us. I worry as to why this is so. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027015.php#IDComment28284194</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Adulterous Saudi princess gets asylum in Britain</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026976.php#IDComment27826064</link>
<description>God does Britain need a new government! I hope most British people are embarrassed that the government would be too embarrassed to speak up for human rights &amp;amp; against stoning women. How can they stand this sell-out &amp;amp; gutless Labour government? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026976.php#IDComment27826064</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Lax security at bombed Jakarta hotels shows the price of complacency</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026959.php#IDComment27639190</link>
<description>I suspect that the militants are waiting for our stupid political correctness wrt Islam to allow the jihad infiltration to grow large enough for this terror strategy to work. Blow up people too soon and Americans, who still feel in control, will harden against Muslims and allow more anti-terror (Patriot Act like) legislation  &amp;amp; powers that the liberals now decry. I think they will bide their time growing stronger in numbers &amp;amp; influence while there&amp;#039;s a Muslim appeasing president who has promised (Cairo speech) to make it &amp;quot;part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.&amp;quot;     I worry about how he plans to &amp;quot;fight against negative stereotypes&amp;quot; - hate speech laws with internet control? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026959.php#IDComment27639190</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Wall Street Journal op-ed: Judges don\&#039;t belong on the battlefield</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026956.php#IDComment27608221</link>
<description>This ruling definitely attempts to override the principle of separations of powers. The commander and chief, and his subordinate military officers, surely can move war captives around in the theater of war without checking with some federal judge&amp;#039;s ruling back home. I&amp;#039;m sure this ruling can be ignored under direct order of the president with impunity. I expect SCOTUS would support the commander in chief here. The question is does Obama have will to ignore it - not waiting for SCOTUS to overturn this idiocy - or will he have the military always choose to risk error only on the side of captive &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; opposing the military mission?    I beginning to suspect these &amp;quot;civil rights&amp;quot; bleeding heart worriers for the rights of our enemies are really just individuals who despise this country and want it harmed in retribution for its evils past &amp;amp; present as they perceive them. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026956.php#IDComment27608221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Brave Sir Ahmed ran away: Hamas-linked CAIR op passed up a chance to be on ALA panel, a</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27385234</link>
<description>I would encourage all to demand on comments at Rehab&amp;#039;s article that he abandon his extremely lame excuse to avoid a debate with Mr. Spencer. We should not let him get by with this.  I have done so under his lame excuse:  &amp;quot;To run from a debate from Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch with the excuse that he is just an unworthy &amp;quot;rabble-rouser&amp;quot; is just lame in view of the fact that Mr Robert is a very well known &amp;amp; read author of many books on Islam (some making the NYT best seller list) and has numerous appearances on much watched venues like FOX News and other web sites. In view of his fame (far beyond yours) as a critic of Islam I think it clear that you are obliged (for Islam surely) to debate him and show up his ignorance and deception. Just making ad hominem attacks doesn&amp;#039;t cut it.  Muslims are not cowards, stop running away.&amp;quot;  Let&amp;#039;s show that Robert Spencer is not some no account &amp;quot;rabble-rouser&amp;quot; he can so easily dismiss. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27385234</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Brave Sir Ahmed ran away: Hamas-linked CAIR op passed up a chance to be on ALA panel, a</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27382870</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re absolutely right! I just posted one critical of Rehab&amp;#039;s extremely lame excuse to avoid a debate with Robert. I imagine that his knees shake at the thought of it - without a debate he surely has low credibility. Of course, with a debate he would earn even lower credibility and I think he knows it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27382870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Brave Sir Ahmed ran away: Hamas-linked CAIR op passed up a chance to be on ALA panel, a</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27299159</link>
<description>Sure, that&amp;#039;s not the best venue but I&amp;#039;m saying that if the ALA is going to have a conference about Islam it shouldn&amp;#039;t be based on the assumption that Islam is good and negative &amp;quot;stereotypes&amp;quot; are to be countered so that only pro-Islamic speakers are invited.  I.e, they have no business making that theme as it produces only propaganda with only pro-Islamic speakers. They might, as a theme, ask what stereotypes are wrong and which are justified but that would then make Mr. Spencer a valid contributor. That would much more in keeping with their Mission Statement.   Considering how material about Islam in most libraries is probably pro-Islam (compliments of CAIR donations) a honest debate at ALA might not be too bad. I don&amp;#039;t think the kind of symposium you described will ever happen (Muslims wouldn&amp;#039;t dare). Hence, I&amp;#039;d be happy to see a fair discussion of Islam anywhere.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27299159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Brave Sir Ahmed ran away: Hamas-linked CAIR op passed up a chance to be on ALA panel, a</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27288103</link>
<description>There must be a get-stupid virus going around - all I seem to read about this ALA nonsense is nonsense. To start, I keep reading this dumb claim that it would be inappropriate for Robert Spenser - a critic of Islam - to be invited or tolerated at this ALA conference because its theme is the dispelling of anti-Islam/Muslim stereotypes. But the underlying presupposition for such a theme is that any negative stereotypes of Islam are wrong and that Islam is just a fine &amp;amp; respectable religion unworthy of the criticisms or stereotypes that the likes of Mr Spencer might invoke. This is hardly self evident in view of the warlike texts of the Koran &amp;amp; the warlike behavior of the terrorists who use them, and hence the reputedly open minded ALA clearly has no cause to make this presupposition - nor this theme. It would be appropriate for the ALA to have a debate on whether or not in fact many negative stereotypes of Islam can be reasonably justified, in which case Robert Spenser&amp;#039;s presence would be very appropriate along with those who might dare to dispute with him.   Then there is the stupid AIM article who logic is that Robert Spencer is an unqualified Islamophobic Islam basher ignorant of all kinds of mitigating scholarly Islamic interpretations because there are Muslims who say so - no further argument necessary.  Then there is the nonsense &amp;amp; calumny that Robert Spencer is no scholar, no matter how long he has studied Islam or how many well known publications he has on the subject because he doesn&amp;#039;t have an advanced degree from some Islamic university department. This is as bad a discrediting Bill Gates as a businessman because he didn&amp;#039;t even graduate - much less attain an MBA - so who should listen to anything Bill Gates has to say?  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026931.php#IDComment27288103</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: A non-answer from a critic</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026924.php#IDComment27252436</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Islamic law is besides the point in a way, though. In my view, the flaws in your writings on Islam transcend simple factual points and speak to far more fundamental conceptual problems.&amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt;    A little thought reveals this as an amazingly stupid statement.  Islamic law, as horrible as it is and so important to Muslims, is beside what point? This is a mind that sees &amp;quot;factual points&amp;quot; transcended? By what exactly?      This is an insipid mind of the &amp;quot;cicadas&amp;quot; class that Oriana Fallaci described and so despised that thinks itself sophisticated to write such  pompous nonsense. A self-righteous cicada that would never face the likes of a Robert Spencer in a stand up debate - it knows it would not come out well.  I suspect he would rather tell himself that Mr. Spencer is only an knuckle dragger without his &amp;quot; social scientific awareness&amp;quot;.    I think the Svends of the world are convincing to no one but other cicadas. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026924.php#IDComment27252436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Jihadist group to meet in Chicago -- will CAIR-Chicago complain?</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026918.php#IDComment27158320</link>
<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realcourage.org/2009/07/july-19-chicago/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.realcourage.org/2009/07/july-19-chicag...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026918.php#IDComment27158320</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : </title>
<link>http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment27065569</link>
<description>This reprehensible cancellation is in direct contradiction to their &lt;b&gt;Library Bill of Rights &lt;/b&gt; :  &lt;i&gt; &amp;quot;III. Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment. &amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/statementspols/statementsif/librarybillrights.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/state...&lt;/a&gt;   and contradicts many of their expressed policies under &amp;quot;Intellectual Freedom&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/missionhistory/keyactionareas/ifaction/intellectual.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/missionhistory/ke...&lt;/a&gt;   Just another bunch of craven cowards. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment27065569</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Hey, kids! Come watch a dramatization of your mom\&#039;s death by suicide bombing!</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026874.php#IDComment26791699</link>
<description>Not likely to happen. There is no emotion stronger than hatred, the greatest impetus for destructive action known to man. Love, unfortunately, is a weakling in comparison. This was recognized long ago in ancient times: in Euripides&amp;#039; play Medea, Medea murdered her own beloved sons to make revenge on her estranged husband. Such Muslim zombies who hate us more than they love their own children can only be destroyed to protect our own. Instead we allow many of them immigrate to the West and/or relocate them here as asylum seekers or refugees. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026874.php#IDComment26791699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: U.S. to grant asylum to 1,350 &quot;Palestinian refugees&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026864.php#IDComment26745189</link>
<description>You can hear an interview &amp;quot;Reporter Patrik Jonsson talks with CSMonitor.com&amp;#039;s Pat Murphy about the US State Department giving asylum to Palestinians living in an Iraqi refugee camp&amp;quot; for more info.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0708/p02s04-usgn.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0708/p02s04-usgn.ht...&lt;/a&gt;   See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjE1OTk0YzE1MGQ0OGMxMTE5YmEwN2YxMmI4MDRiZjI=&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjE1OTk0...&lt;/a&gt;   BTW, I wonder if these refuges will be able to demand that their &amp;quot;close relatives&amp;quot; in Palestine be allowed to immigrate. We&amp;#039;re suckers and they won&amp;#039;t give us a even break.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026864.php#IDComment26745189</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: U.S. to grant asylum to 1,350 &quot;Palestinian refugees&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026864.php#IDComment26744879</link>
<description>Good arguments. Send them to Obama, the state Dept. your senators and perhaps FOX News. I would think the people at the proposed dumping, like Southern California, would have objections. Isn&amp;#039;t there a site for constructing petitions?   Cheers.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026864.php#IDComment26744879</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>