en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/332726 Comments by Ole Sandberg http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/08/27/the-killer-bs-will-give-ca-16-unemployment/#IDComment95533884 The commenters are missing a couple of points. First, the consequences of the damage done to California won't be limited to Calilfornia, it will drag down the entire national economy. Secondly, much of the damage was done not by Californians but by the federal government. It wasn't California that turned off the water in the Central Valley, it was the feds. Schadenfreude should be kept to a minimum. Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:42:51 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/08/27/the-killer-bs-will-give-ca-16-unemployment/#IDComment95533884 http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/20/jon-stewart-doubles-down-on-supporting-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment94405038 Although I don't question the "right" of anyone to build a structure to be used for a lawful purpose, I am one of the apparently tiny minority of extremists who question whether the promotion of islam through jihad, stealthy or open, should be considered a lawful purpose. Why should we supinely accept that a "religion" that includes among its doctrines polygamy, execution of apostates and the ultimate subjection and humiliation of all kuffars among other horrors, qualifies for protection under the exercise clause of the First Amendment, any more than the Church of Latter Day Saints did before it abandoned its doctrinal adherence to polygamy?. Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:37:57 +0000 http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/20/jon-stewart-doubles-down-on-supporting-ground-zero-mosque/#IDComment94405038 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027153.php#IDComment30065644 He is not dead, he is just resting, watching old Monty Python skits. Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:37:57 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027153.php#IDComment30065644 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027084.php#IDComment29041667 I don't mind. In fact, dear writer, I'd encourage you to identify, dissect and demolish every one of the countless imbecilities in the President's Cairo speech. Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:35:07 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027084.php#IDComment29041667 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026938.php#IDComment27455351 A sharp rebuke is long overdue. Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:53:47 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026938.php#IDComment27455351 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026687.php#IDComment25108027 At least he had the decency to use a "sharp edged" weapon. Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:10:19 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026687.php#IDComment25108027 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026630.php#IDComment24643142 Robert Ferrigno has written a couple of novels, "Prayers for the Assassin", and "Sins of the Assassin" both of which deal, with somewhat mixed success, with life in a partly islamicized United States. The first book in particular has some very well conceived and well written sections. Both could easily be made into movies. Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:44:01 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026630.php#IDComment24643142 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026572.php#IDComment24188801 I suppose the post-"election" events in the streets of Teheran are examples of the "robust debate" our president finds so encouraging. Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:50:41 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026572.php#IDComment24188801 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026437.php#IDComment23420970 It is a pretty good rule of thumb that the predictable consequences of political acts, especially when they are the result of much deliberation and planning, are also the intended ones. The predictable consequences of the speech are to strengthen Islam, weaken the United States and the rest of the non-muslim world and make Israel defenseless. Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:25:00 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026437.php#IDComment23420970 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026435.php#IDComment23407679 Whatever meets with TaRa's approval is harmful to the non-muslim world. Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:31:04 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026435.php#IDComment23407679 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026441.php#IDComment23407417 "In the long run, of course, nothing Obama said today makes any difference." Would that it were so. The predictable effect of his speech will be to undermine efforts in the United States and in the rest of the non-muslim world to resist Islam's relentless progress. Every ignorant and lazy politician on the local, state and federal level now has a ready made excuse to capitulate to muslim demands for preferential treatment and special accomodations, while, conversely the president's statements are bound to discourage those who attempt to mount resistance to islamic incursions. Another predictable effect is to demoralize dissenters from islamic tyranny and thought control in the muslim world. All in all, a good day's work of difference-making. Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:24:13 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026441.php#IDComment23407417 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026435.php#IDComment23396316 The current occupant of the White House is not abandoning liberalism. He was never a liberal in the classical or any other meaningful sense. He is a revolutionary. It is tempting to turn Mr. Fitzgerald's exhortations to read and study around and implore him to read and study the president's own books and those of his intellectual mentors, the books written about him and his associates and the books and articles written by and about his friends and fellow travelers. It is dreary and depressing reading, but they are the only reliable sources of information about who he is. Listen to the tapes of his "pastor". They tell you more about him than his speeches, which are bad enough. Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:22:11 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026435.php#IDComment23396316 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23189550 I'm not sure there is any real disagreement between us. I'll take a look at the papers you mention. Where does one find the Soros paper? Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:23:30 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23189550 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23163292 The president is speaking in the optative not in the indicative mood. He obviously knows that his words do not describe current realities. Consequently, his motive for saying what he is saying can only be to help usher in the not yet achieved reality he describes. This is elementary revolutionary technique. The predictable, and consequently most likely the intended effect of his words is to encourage muslims residing in the United States aggressively to pursue their demands for special consideration, and at the same time to provide craven, lazy and ignorant politicians on the federal, state and local level the cover, alibi and excuse to persist in their ignorance and succumb to such demands. Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:02:06 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23163292 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23161509 "Does he think he can play fast and loose with the nature of this country?" The answer, plainly is "yes, he does." And, what is more, he is getting away with it. Look at the stunningly intrusive interventions in the economy his administration has been able to pull off in such a short time. Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:24:36 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026400.php#IDComment23161509 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026398.php#IDComment23146286 He has left Carter in the dust already. Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:54:18 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026398.php#IDComment23146286 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026380.php#IDComment23037261 Hilarious comment, moh_foe. Someone changing his name to "Benito 'Blitz' Quisling" would undoubtedly have raised an eyebrow or two as well. Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:14:37 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026380.php#IDComment23037261 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026377.php#IDComment23005109 Shouldn't it be the "Jihad, Hope and Change Brigade." Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:44:28 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026377.php#IDComment23005109 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026282.php#IDComment22332957 There has to be existing Christian organizations already engaged in the kind work Mr. Fitzgerald describes. Who are they, and how does one support them? If such organizations do not exist, they will have to be created. Are there any such organizations in gestation out there, andif so, how does one find them? Tue, 26 May 2009 15:58:14 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026282.php#IDComment22332957 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026257.php#IDComment22194332 Could the nervousness of the interviewer at the mention of Saudi funding have something to do with Saudi ownership interests in the publishing empire of which Fox is a part? Sun, 24 May 2009 20:14:38 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026257.php#IDComment22194332