<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1442146</link>
		<description>Comments by CTimbo</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Alec Baldwin: Andrew Breitbart &#039;A Festering Boil on the Anus of Public Discourse&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/18/alec-baldwin-andrew-breitbart-a-festering-boil-on-the-anus-of-public-discourse/#IDComment296079121</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Boil on the anus of public discourse&amp;quot;?  It appears it has become a pox on both of the houses of Baldwin.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/18/alec-baldwin-andrew-breitbart-a-festering-boil-on-the-anus-of-public-discourse/#IDComment296079121</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Astroturf: Unions Paid #OccupyCPAC Protesters $60</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/astroturf-unions-paid-occupycpac-protesters-60/#IDComment289979523</link>
<description>They are way overpaid.  But that&amp;#039;s union work for ya. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/astroturf-unions-paid-occupycpac-protesters-60/#IDComment289979523</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Occupy Oakland Targets Israel, Votes 135-1 to Support Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jpollak/2012/02/10/occupy-oakland-targets-israel-votes-135-1-to-support-boycott-divestment-sanctions/#IDComment289148011</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The activists of Occupy Oakland voted 135-1 to support the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions &amp;quot;  With what?   They couldn&amp;#039;t economically affect anything.  They are bums.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jpollak/2012/02/10/occupy-oakland-targets-israel-votes-135-1-to-support-boycott-divestment-sanctions/#IDComment289148011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSM Looks For Any Reason To Declare Tea Party Dead</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/06/msm-looks-for-any-reason-to-declare-tea-party-dead/#IDComment286160131</link>
<description>Due  to all the redistricting being done by conservatives, thanks to the Tea Party, you should be in for a barrel of laughs for a long time to come.  And we&amp;#039;re laughing along with ya, and at ya. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/06/msm-looks-for-any-reason-to-declare-tea-party-dead/#IDComment286160131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSM Looks For Any Reason To Declare Tea Party Dead</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/06/msm-looks-for-any-reason-to-declare-tea-party-dead/#IDComment286158628</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.&amp;quot;  Mark Twain  The Tea Party is not an organization, never was, never will be.  It is a philosophy.  And that is what the left cannot understand.  They are chasing windmills.  The same philosophy that changed the political landscape in 2010, is still alive and well, and will be seen again in November.    But as true citizen candidates emerge that share our philosophy, it will be up to us to keep each other informed.  The MSM will not publicize them.  Adopt one, or two, or as many as you can, and help them with donations, time, and talent. Small contributions add up.   Double or triple the our numbers in congress and together we can drive the nation&amp;#039;s political agenda, regardless of how un-conservative the White House may be.  And do not forget, the next Congress will be confirming Supreme Court Justices, and that may be the most important long term consequence of 2012.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/06/msm-looks-for-any-reason-to-declare-tea-party-dead/#IDComment286158628</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Raging Hypocrisy Alert: Politico&#039;s Jonathan Martin Defends Use of &#039;Cracker&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/03/raging-hypocrisy-alert-politicos-jonathan-martin-defends-use-of-the-slur-cracker/#IDComment283735777</link>
<description>Given the source, I would consider it an honor to be referred to as a &amp;quot;cracker&amp;quot;.  It means you have intellectually beaten them down to name calling.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/03/raging-hypocrisy-alert-politicos-jonathan-martin-defends-use-of-the-slur-cracker/#IDComment283735777</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : After Planned Parenthood PR Blitz, Susan G Komen Foundation Caves and Reverses Funding Decision</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/libertychick/2012/02/03/after-planned-parenthood-pr-blitz-susan-g-komen-foundation-caves-and-reverses-funding-decision/#IDComment283732661</link>
<description>I had known of the Komen/abortion mill connection for some time now, but it was essentially a hidden dirty secret.  The uproar has now made it common knowledge.  Given the well documented fact that charitable giving is primarily a conservative phenomena, Komen will lose big time on this one.  I would bet as contributions drop, they&amp;#039;ll reconsider their alliance with PP.  I used to view pink as meaningful, now it is a reminder of baby nurseries that might have been.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/libertychick/2012/02/03/after-planned-parenthood-pr-blitz-susan-g-komen-foundation-caves-and-reverses-funding-decision/#IDComment283732661</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : James O’Keefe Sues New Jersey Star-Ledger for Defamation after New Hampshire Voter Fraud </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment280383721</link>
<description>Ya got one problem there dj, according to Landrieu her phone system was already broken.  That was her excuse for not taking calls from her constituents.  O&amp;#039;Keefe was just there to prove she was lying.  He never intended on damaging it, he was out to prove it was working.  Maybe if you got your facts straight you might not look as foolish as you do. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment280383721</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Tea Party Leader To GOP Establishment: We Aren&#039;t Going Anywhere, Deal With It</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tea-party-leader-to-gop-establishment-we-arent-going-anywhere-deal-with-it/#IDComment279240484</link>
<description>There is no Tea Party candidate, not even Newt.  He has backed them in the past, and is being supported for that reason only.  Those that consider themselves Tea Partiers should continue to focus on local, state and congressional elections.  As more are elected there will eventually be a national leader emerge.  In fact there are already some who were elected in 2010 just waiting in the wings.  The establishment may get this nomination, but they will also lose several more incumbent congressmen.  With more Tea Partiers in congress, any president will have to come to terms with them. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tea-party-leader-to-gop-establishment-we-arent-going-anywhere-deal-with-it/#IDComment279240484</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Tea Party Leader To GOP Establishment: We Aren&#039;t Going Anywhere, Deal With It</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tea-party-leader-to-gop-establishment-we-arent-going-anywhere-deal-with-it/#IDComment279235801</link>
<description>The establishment still doesn&amp;#039;t get the &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot;.  It is not an organization, it is a philosophy.  After 2010 do they think we all just disappeared?  They are going to be in for one big surprise this November.  Throw out the incumbents and replace them with the those that represent the Tea Party philosophy.  If you don&amp;#039;t have one in your district, adopt one, or several, across the country.  Small contributions can add up quickly. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tea-party-leader-to-gop-establishment-we-arent-going-anywhere-deal-with-it/#IDComment279235801</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : James O’Keefe Sues New Jersey Star-Ledger for Defamation after New Hampshire Voter Fraud </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment279220761</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The New Jersey Star-Ledger editorial board reported O&amp;rsquo;Keefe &amp;ldquo;committed a felony by fraudulently obtaining a ballot in the name of another person; [broke] New Hampshire law by recording another person.&amp;rdquo; &amp;quot;   Nowhere in the article does it link this fact to the filing.  Nor does it tie the obvious attempt at defamation, which you point out, to the suit.   Your reading comprehension is lacking, but you are a perfect example why the MSM writes to an 8th grade level. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment279220761</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Ron Reagan, Jr.: People On Right &#039;Would Vote For Himmler Over Obama&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-reagan-jr-people-on-right-would-vote-for-himmler-over-obama/#IDComment276441141</link>
<description>I remember Nancy Reagan, his mother, once saying that she loved her children, but sometimes didn&amp;#039;t like them.  It is obvious why. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/ron-reagan-jr-people-on-right-would-vote-for-himmler-over-obama/#IDComment276441141</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Orders Bailout of Union-Dominated School District</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2012/01/23/judge-orders-bailout-of-union-dominated-school-district/#IDComment272712292</link>
<description>Granny, Where I hail from conservatives have a lock.  Supply me with a link and I&amp;#039;ll do my part.  Keep up the good fight.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2012/01/23/judge-orders-bailout-of-union-dominated-school-district/#IDComment272712292</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Orders Bailout of Union-Dominated School District</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2012/01/23/judge-orders-bailout-of-union-dominated-school-district/#IDComment272521805</link>
<description>The rest of PA just doesn&amp;#039;t get it.  They have to pay their &amp;quot;fair share&amp;quot; to Philadelphia&amp;#039;s unions.  And since they are an Obama state, I&amp;#039;m sure they would agree.    (sarcasm) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/eagtv/2012/01/23/judge-orders-bailout-of-union-dominated-school-district/#IDComment272521805</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Christie Defends Romney: Newt &#039;Has Embarrassed The Party&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-defends-romney-newt-gingrich-has-embarrassed-the-party/#IDComment271536774</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Newt&amp;rsquo;s group, AmericanSolutions.com, was among the top-tier groups supporting the early Tea Party rallies in every respect&amp;quot;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/22/why-the-tea-party-loves-gingrich-despite-suspicions-about-his-record0.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/22/...&lt;/a&gt;  He was with them.  Where were the others? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-defends-romney-newt-gingrich-has-embarrassed-the-party/#IDComment271536774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Coulter: SC Voters Cared More About &#039;Snotty&#039; Remarks Than Beating Obama</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-sc-voters-cared-more-about-snotty-remarks-than-beating-obama/#IDComment271532346</link>
<description>IMO you are actually pointing out one of Newt&amp;#039;s strengths, the over exposure of his deficiencies. For better or worse, we already know anything and everything about him, thanks to the Left Stream Media. There is little left for an October surprise. His warts have already entered into the national calculus. You either hate him, or you accept him as a possible candidate. And those that hate him may not hate him as much as Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/coulter-sc-voters-cared-more-about-snotty-remarks-than-beating-obama/#IDComment271532346</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Christie Defends Romney: Newt &#039;Has Embarrassed The Party&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-defends-romney-newt-gingrich-has-embarrassed-the-party/#IDComment271472240</link>
<description>Just one question, where was Romney, and Christie for that matter, during the Obamacare fight and the Tea Party ascendancy in 2010?  They seemed to have been in hiding.  That is not the type of leadership we need. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/christie-defends-romney-newt-gingrich-has-embarrassed-the-party/#IDComment271472240</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sarah Palin Was Right: Newt Soars</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271470443</link>
<description>Goodness, another woman scorned.  Talk about EMOTIONS.  Lol.  But a rarity, an anti Tea Party &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;.  Must be lonely. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271470443</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sarah Palin Was Right: Newt Soars</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271431901</link>
<description>Eileen, Palin has not endorsed Gingrich, yet.  And I will honestly tell you that I lean towards Santorum, although you are not helping him with your comments.  Until I looked at your posts, I was certain you had to be one of the other candidates supporters.   My point is that Palin still has influence, and of the 4 remaining candidates Gingrich has proven to be the most loyal ally of the Tea Party, even though he may not live up to all its ideals.  When they were disparaged almost everywhere, he showed his support and used his organization American Solutions to their benefit. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271431901</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sarah Palin Was Right: Newt Soars</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271282262</link>
<description>So you are saying the majority of voters are well informed?  Comparatively that one is a no brainer. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sberry/2012/01/22/sarah-palin-was-right-newt-soars/#IDComment271282262</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>