<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/480100</link>
		<description>Comments by Bruce_Boisclair</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Buzz: Mets Discussing Sheffield</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18085599</link>
<description> Uh, no.  When I heard this on Boomer &amp;amp; Carton this morning, I immediately thought that this was a strategic ploy to get the Phillies to move on him.  I don&amp;#039;t think he will ever be a Met, although stranger things have happened (particular if there are injuries, although I think Nick Evans deserves a shot if this is the case, no?)  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/buzz-mets-discussing-sheffield/#IDComment18085599</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: New Design and Comments Section</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/note-new-design-and-comments-section/#IDComment18085246</link>
<description> Kudos to Matt for braving our rabid fanbase and making changes.  The left-slant is a little disorienting (I think I have a neck crink), but I understand this is likely to be temporary until Matt finds a mobile interface (it did turn out nice on the Bberry this morning.)  The comments are nice....  Let&amp;#039;s Go Mets!  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/03/note-new-design-and-comments-section/#IDComment18085246</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>