<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/275070</link>
		<description>Comments by Bruce Mellen</description>
<item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12058885</link>
<description>Sorry.  I&amp;rsquo;m actually very happy to see this, but jumped past that.  I have been waiting for years to get beyond the 1000s of forums/blogs that are heavily moderated/filtered, and still not looked at when determining policy.  Emails to politicians almost always go into perceived black holes. I have a lot of hopes a single forum under Change.gov or Google, or whatever becomes blessed by this administration. I&amp;rsquo;ve had a lot of pent-up frustration waiting for something like this to appear.   And once they make some changes/fixes (hopefully quickly, before our major shifts in policy are settled), I&amp;rsquo;d like to see it rolled out to include any subject related to government.  I&amp;rsquo;m a systems person who has seen a lot of short-sighted application implementations in my day &amp;ndash; thus very critical and full of positive suggestions to remedy user interfaces. I would like to add&amp;hellip; &amp;bull;I had a very difficult time getting back to find and re-comment on the above thread, even after RSS of the thread I started (subscribing in Outlook), or clicking on &amp;ldquo;Go to comment&amp;rdquo; on the email I received.  What did I miss? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12058885</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020548</link>
<description>And once something is posted, it should not be able to be edited. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020548</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020328</link>
<description>(Continued from above) * RSS for new threads containing specified keyword search combination (saved searches) * RSS of a thread&amp;rsquo;s responses at any point/below in a thread * Allow more than text in replies (.pdf, video,&amp;hellip;.), and allow more space in each comment * Allow the creation of a thread response also linked to another thread. * Thumbs-up/down needs to be expanded to slightly up/down I have many specific thoughts on how to make this more manageable and exceedingly extensible, and would welcome a call from the appropriate Obama team so that a better forum/blog can be built for all this Main Street participation. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020328</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020137</link>
<description>(Continued from above) Add the following to my minimum suggestions&amp;hellip; * Sophisticated search capability for [sub]threads sorted by hit score, viewing frequency, or up/down by date/time, and filtered by date/time range, keywords/phrases (and allow for very complex Boolean searches), in titles and/or content.  And allow the saving of searches for future visits to the site.* Entries need to have date/time stamp displayed * Allow the specification of a &amp;lsquo;page&amp;rsquo; size and the ability to directly go to a &amp;lsquo;page&amp;rsquo; instead of just going to the next and previous &amp;lsquo;page&amp;rsquo; * Allow my bookmarking of things I read, so I can find them later * Google needs to index the forum hourly (Continued below in a response to my own post) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020137</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020114</link>
<description>After seeing thousands of comments here, I know there needs to be a better way to be able to get at pieces of interest as well as a developing (nor not) consensus on particular aspects.  A simple forum such as this is not the way to best get feedback from Main Street.  I would suggest, at a minimum&amp;hellip; * Titles/one-liners for each thread and allowing the user to expand the thread from there (or by hovering over it see the 1st 100 words/abstract, and clicking to open it in a new browser tab), rather than forcing the person to collapse so much text and not see the structure of the thread * Associating keywords and phrases with each thread root, allowing respondents the opportunity to add keywords/phrases to their position in the thread and below  I have many specific thoughts on how to make this more manageable and exceedingly extensible, and would welcome a call from the appropriate Obama team so that a better forum/blog can be built for all this Main Street participation. (Continued below in a response to my own post) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12020114</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Change.gov : Join the Discussion: Former Sen. Daschle responds on health care | Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Trans</title>
<link>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12019423</link>
<description>It takes more than streamlining payments.  The reimbursement rates must also allow for the provider to treat the patient without loosing money. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2008 03:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/join_the_discussion_daschles_healthcare_response/#IDComment12019423</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>