<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/758604</link>
		<description>Comments by Brer_Fox</description>
<item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Lawmakers gather in special session to slash budget | Seattle News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News |</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/111719789.html#IDComment115370916</link>
<description>A relatively simple law requiring proof of citizenship before being eligible for any services would cut the budget by billions.  If you doubt that go to a welfare, housing, food stamp supply office and watch.  Missouri has such a law and it is having a huge positive impact on it&amp;#039;s budget.  It is estimated by some that illegal aliens are getting approximately 90% of all handouts.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/111719789.html#IDComment115370916</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Daily Camera.com: : Guest opinion: The truth about carbon dioxide, climate and the weather - Boulder Daily Camera</title>
<link>http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_14167354#IDComment52050412</link>
<description>Actually, you have been badly misled.  The consensus of which you speak does not exist.  I suggest you read the emails.  The CRU crowd even discuss how to make it appear that such a consensus exists.  They even admit, point blank, that they have been proved to have manipulated data.  There is a lot there that demonstrate clearly the corruption of those who have mislead you.  For an analysis, line by line I suggest you read: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.assassinationscience.com/climategate/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.assassinationscience.com/climategate/&lt;/a&gt;  Until you read them for yourself I suggest you not let you lack of knowledge show so much. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_14167354#IDComment52050412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BigGreenBoulder : Boulder scientist caught up in &quot;climategate&quot; talks back</title>
<link>http://biggreenboulder.com/environment/boulder-scientist-caught-up-in-climategate-talks-back/#IDComment51945851</link>
<description>I have read the emails.  A really good source for them is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.assassinationscience.com/climategate/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.assassinationscience.com/climategate/&lt;/a&gt; Where the author has clarified what each one is about and follows the interaction of the &amp;quot;scientists.&amp;quot;  Unlike the AGW crowd John Costella includes a link to the original email so that anyone can verify the context and verify the accuracy of the comments.  I am sorry but, after going through them I do not believe any of those involved, including Kevin Trenberth, can truly be called, &amp;quot;scientists.  I suggest you read the emails yourself and quit taking anyone else&amp;#039;s word, including mine.    The garbage they have presented as science is arrogance on steroids. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggreenboulder.com/environment/boulder-scientist-caught-up-in-climategate-talks-back/#IDComment51945851</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>