<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/548844</link>
		<description>Comments by Botox</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Top Obama aide fires preemptive broadside at Perry</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182759910</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s the Tea Partiers fault. If we would just use a tire gauge, billions of dollars would be saved. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182759910</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Top Obama aide fires preemptive broadside at Perry</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182759301</link>
<description>But you have to understand that if it wasn&amp;#039;t for the tsunami in Japan the economy would be roaring ahead. And Mr. President, unexpected events *always* happen. Except no one else makes excuses.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182759301</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Top Obama aide fires preemptive broadside at Perry</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182758291</link>
<description>What happened to Obama&amp;#039;s purple rhetoric about listening to all ideas, and complimenting success regardless of someone&amp;#039;s political affiliation? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.7e6f5d975b7d7c5e5e0bad3f509e9d01.191&amp;show_article=1#IDComment182758291</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Before the Obama Justice Dept Dropped Charges Against Him, Black Panther Advocated Killing White Bab</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/before-the-obama-justice-dept-dropped-charges-against-him-black-panther-advocated-killing-white-babies/#IDComment85235125</link>
<description>The reason why Obama&amp;#039;s not commenting is because *now* he says he doesn&amp;#039;t have all the facts, and so he doesn&amp;#039;t want to jump to conclusions. Another teaching moment brought to you by our Dear Leader. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/before-the-obama-justice-dept-dropped-charges-against-him-black-panther-advocated-killing-white-babies/#IDComment85235125</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama fires back at political critics</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.233373d23429b898bbcc4a0e13f0af00.c41#IDComment31395827</link>
<description>Poll question was phrased very poorly. If I was polled, this conservative would have definitely answered &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;, Obama will bring change to America. Not a good change mind you, but change nonetheless. Change diapers, not America! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.233373d23429b898bbcc4a0e13f0af00.c41#IDComment31395827</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin says Obama\&#039;s health care plan is \&#039;evil\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99UC07G0#IDComment30015387</link>
<description>Those enraged individuals who say, &amp;quot;That&amp;#039;s not in the bill! That&amp;#039;s not in the bill&amp;quot; let me grant your argument for the time being. Your displeasure with Sarah Palin&amp;#039;s comments indicates that you actually partly agree with her.   Like many who blew gaskets when defending Obama against claims that he supported infanticide, you seem to be saying hey, *IF* Sarah Palin&amp;#039;s description of the health care bill is accurate and/or *IF* pro-lifers characterizations of Obama supporting infanticide are accurate, then outrage would indeed be justified.   *IF* the proposed health care bill is based on subjective judgment of an individual&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;level of productivity in society,&amp;#039; and parents, or a baby with Down Syndrome would have to stand in front of a &amp;#039;death panel&amp;#039; of bureaucrats, that policy would indeed be evil. Likewise, *IF* Obama did support a policy and/or law that supported infanticide, that policy, law, and individual who supported such would indeed be evil. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Aug 2009 04:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99UC07G0#IDComment30015387</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pelosi: Nothing more to say on her CIA allegation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22079337</link>
<description>LOL! That&amp;#039;s funny! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22079337</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pelosi: Nothing more to say on her CIA allegation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078966</link>
<description>Someone keeps removing my reply. Why! What I said was the truth. Here it is again:   Obama is not a good man. Anyone who supports infanticide is not good. Even NARAL and a unanimous Senate recognized this as pure evil.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pelosi: Nothing more to say on her CIA allegation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078753</link>
<description>Obama is not a good man. A good man does not support infanticide. Even NARAL and a unanimous Senate didn&amp;#039;t go this far and saw this as pure evil.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078753</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pelosi: Nothing more to say on her CIA allegation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078544</link>
<description>Obama is not a good man. A good man does not support infanticide.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pelosi: Nothing more to say on her CIA allegation</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078421</link>
<description>If this is all such a distraction, and Nancy wants to talk about the economy and the environment, why did she bring up EITs in the first place? She was the one that started this discussion. Bring on the Truth Commission! Put the Speaker under oath. Relase *all* the interrogation memos.   Did you see Steny Hoyer shepherding Pelosi away from the podium and the media call out that question about revoking her security clearance. Hoyer&amp;#039;s laughed! I laughed too. We also have a joke of a &amp;quot;leader&amp;quot; in Barack Obama. All he does is vote present.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98BCGD80#IDComment22078421</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>