<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/933989</link>
		<description>Comments by BillyEdHatfield</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama to Congress : don\&#039;t \&#039;muck up\&#039; recovery</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283926152</link>
<description>I find it highly ironic that the one person who has done more to &amp;quot;muck up&amp;quot; the economy than anyone in the country (e.g. trillion-dollar deficits, obamaCare, banning offshore drilling, blocking the Canadian pipeline, etc. etc.) has the audacity to warn Congress to not &amp;quot;muck up&amp;quot; things. Truly amazing.        Only in Washington could the number of employed people decline by 1.2 million from December to January and the unemployment rate actually go DOWN. A perfect example of rigging the calculation by excluding millions of unemployed people from the unemployment rate calculations. Yet not one word in the mainstream media about this anomaly. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Feb 2012 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283926152</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama to Congress : don\&#039;t \&#039;muck up\&#039; recovery</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283236669</link>
<description>Today&amp;#039;s unemployment number was the most flagrant case of numbers-rigging that I have seen in quite a while. And 99% of the sheeple and media lapdogs actually believe it. Only in Washington could a loss of 1.2 million jobs from December to January result in a DECREASE in the unemployment rate. Unbelievable. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Feb 2012 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283236669</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Exclusive: MSNBC&#039;s O&#039;Donnell Says Obama Doesn&#039;t Want To Run Against Romney</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-msnbcs-odonnell-says-obama-doesnt-want-to-run-against-romney/#IDComment259088834</link>
<description>Mitt Romney is clearly the safest bet to defeat obama. By definition, any &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; is going to get more Independent votes than someone who is perceived as being more right-wing. Except for the sore losers who wouldn&amp;#039;t vote for Romney, he will pick up all of the Republican votes AND the Independents.   By the way, if you&amp;#039;re such a sore loser as to not vote, or vote for obama if Romney gets the nomination, go right ahead, loser. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/exclusive-msnbcs-odonnell-says-obama-doesnt-want-to-run-against-romney/#IDComment259088834</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US to release women action plan: Obama official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.1c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242305997</link>
<description>LOL...this guy is a trip.......He MAY be losing it...... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 04:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.1c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242305997</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Call to Arms: Join Me in DC Saturday to Stop ObamaCare</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jvoight/2010/03/18/call-to-arms-join-me-in-dc-saturday-to-stop-obamacare/#IDComment62865735</link>
<description>Thanks for doing this, Jon. For those of you who can&amp;#039;t make it, see you at the polls on November 2nd. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jvoight/2010/03/18/call-to-arms-join-me-in-dc-saturday-to-stop-obamacare/#IDComment62865735</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>