BiadeMedici
98p50 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
7 years ago @ The Toast - An Open Thread, and Se... · 0 replies · +2 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - An Open Thread, and Se... · 0 replies · +12 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - An Open Thread, and Se... · 0 replies · +3 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 0 replies · +3 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 0 replies · +8 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 9 replies · +22 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 0 replies · +3 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Cocktail Hour: Open Th... · 0 replies · +2 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Link Roundup! · 0 replies · +4 points
7 years ago @ The Toast - Aunt Acid: Advice on P... · 2 replies · +17 points
I'm sorry, but -- what is this formulation? "Should I show more consideration for the human being or the animal?"
I guess I do not have pets and animal welfare/environment stuff is not a *major* part of my ethics, so I realize there's space for disagreement on this according to what people's priorities are, but...a human being is a human being. A cat is not a human being. There's not an equivalence. Aunt Acid's right: don't hurt your friend.
(There are also the other considerations: the letter and Aunt Acid's response are fairly clear that it wouldn't be a harmful, dangerous situation for the pet to be returned -- I read the need for medication as arising after the cat passed into LW's care, not that LW's friend had denied her cat needed medication, for example.)