He's a guy who saw the business pass him by. He became so over in the early part of the decade in large part because he was one of the best wrestlers on the roster. And if he had started a few years earlier and legitimately had a decade of that run, he'd be remembered as one of the best of his generation. Unfortunately for him, he got lost in the wave of ultra-talented wrestlers joining the ranks of WWE in the middle part of the decade. Instead of being a top 3 wrestler in the company, suddenly the argument could be made that he's not even in the top 10. And then yes, he seemed to lose motivation. Whether that's his own doing, or because of how he was being used, or both, it happened. Unfortunate for a lot of reasons.
Can I pick he doesn't show up? If I can't, I pick episode 22.
If he has a 90-day non-compete, how is he going to hit the indies before the summer is over? Unless you think that Cass of all people is going to be the one to challenge that?
So, CM Punk was never going to be booked in the main event of Wrestlemania, so he shouldn't complain about it then, right?
I mean, he took a PPV spot from every match on the prelim card that could have been there. So that part isn't true. And clearly he's making way more than most of his contemporaries. So there's some validity in the criticism, even if it isn't a perfect apple to apple comparison.
Awesome trailer. Very excited. My computer sucks and I can't get it to freeze on time. Was that Tommy Dreamer in the roster flash?
Adding Dolph Ziggler and Baron Corbin to the match means only one thing. One of those two is walking out as World Champion." I'd like you to do the math and tell us how often a late addition won the match vs. being added to take the pin. Because in a title match, I'm fairly confident in saying late additions (non-injury related) are there to lose more often than they're there to win.
Rusev/Lana, Jimmy Uso/Naomi, Daniel Bryan/Brie. There are quite a few
You had me til the Randy Orton bit. That's just wrong by any sort of metric.