<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4017142</link>
		<description>Comments by Baggi</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Republicans Fall For Manufactured Story</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/03/02/republicans-fall-for-manufactured-story/#IDComment306721838</link>
<description>I didn&amp;#039;t see what Santorum said as an admonishment to Rush.  He said Rush was being absurd, which Rush was, on purpose. Like when Breitbart was calling the Occupies &amp;quot;Rapists&amp;quot;.  There was a point behind their absurdity. I think Santorum and Rush are right.  If this girl wants to be a whore, we should be able to see the tape! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/03/02/republicans-fall-for-manufactured-story/#IDComment306721838</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Super Tuesday Preview: Tennessee </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/26/a-super-tuesday-preview-tennessee/#IDComment302546313</link>
<description>I hope that Newt does well in TN. I don&amp;#039;t that Fred Thompson has much sway anymore in TN, but I sure hope he does. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/26/a-super-tuesday-preview-tennessee/#IDComment302546313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sacha Baron Cohen&#039;s &#039;Dictator&#039; Dumps Ashes Of Kim Jong Il All Over Ryan Seacrest</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-dumps-ashes-of-kim-jong-il-all-over-ryan-seacrest/#IDComment302466665</link>
<description>Seems like he could have done something much better than that. Instead he goes for the cheap physical gag? He&amp;#039;s usually more clever. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sacha-baron-cohens-dictator-dumps-ashes-of-kim-jong-il-all-over-ryan-seacrest/#IDComment302466665</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: I&#039;ve &#039;Fallen Short Of The Glory Of God&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302240401</link>
<description>We all have, Newt. We all have. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302240401</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Prager Destroys Obama&#039;s Algae Oil Speech </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/prager-destroys-obamas-algae-oil-speech/#IDComment301608937</link>
<description>One of my favorite talk radio show hosts. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/prager-destroys-obamas-algae-oil-speech/#IDComment301608937</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Piers Morgan, Comedians: GOP Candidates Have &#039;No Character&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-comedians-gop-candidates-have-no-character/#IDComment300206045</link>
<description>Does anyone watch Piers Morgan? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-comedians-gop-candidates-have-no-character/#IDComment300206045</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300201447</link>
<description>It never ceases to amaze me how all the bigots and racists managed to all become Democrats while simultaneously accusing Republicans of bigotry and racism. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300201447</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Hammers CNN On Birth Control Question: You Never Asked Obama Why He Voted For Infanticide</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-cnn-on-birth-control-question-you-never-asked-obama-why-he-voted-for-infanticide/#IDComment299402065</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s good to see Newt back on track. He will make a fantastic POTUS. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-cnn-on-birth-control-question-you-never-asked-obama-why-he-voted-for-infanticide/#IDComment299402065</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite of the Day: Jake Tapper Challenges Jay Carney On &quot;Aggressive Journalism&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299388007</link>
<description>Is that Mara Liason in the background?  Her facial expressions during that exchange should be top of the news on every channel. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/22/sound-bite-of-the-day-jake-tapper-challenges-jay-carney-on-aggressive-journalism/#IDComment299388007</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum &#039;Phony Theology&#039; Remark Causes Media Firestorm; Obama Given Pass For Saying Similar</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-phony-theology-remark-causes-media-firestorm-obama-given-pass-for-saying-similar/#IDComment298738438</link>
<description>It didn&amp;#039;t sound like he was talking about liberation theology.  Sounded like he was talking about the religion of Environmentalism. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-phony-theology-remark-causes-media-firestorm-obama-given-pass-for-saying-similar/#IDComment298738438</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: If Mitt Loses Michigan, He&#039;s Done</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-if-mitt-loses-michigan-hes-done/#IDComment296925180</link>
<description>I do agree that Romney is in big trouble if he cannot win Michigan and Ohio. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-if-mitt-loses-michigan-hes-done/#IDComment296925180</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Despite Olbermann&#039;s Lies, The Fact and Causes Of Occupy Violence Are Established</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/17/despite-olbermanns-lies-the-fact-and-causes-of-occupy-violence-are-established/#IDComment295423647</link>
<description>A tag on these videos would be nice.  I went to watch the video, my 10 year old daughter sitting behind me doing homework, and within the first 15 seconds the F word is used. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 05:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/17/despite-olbermanns-lies-the-fact-and-causes-of-occupy-violence-are-established/#IDComment295423647</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : TSA Agents Make Pass At Female Passenger, Scan Three Times</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tsa-agents-make-pass-at-female-passenger-scan-three-times/#IDComment295205313</link>
<description>Man, if I were paid to have x-ray vision, I wouldn&amp;#039;t want to take a second look at hotties all day. I would rather look at fat men.  It&amp;#039;s like putting men and women together on our naval ships and then being shocked when the women get pregnant.  How does that happen? Surely we can overcome human nature. Right? Right? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tsa-agents-make-pass-at-female-passenger-scan-three-times/#IDComment295205313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Praises Income Inequality</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-praises-income-inequality/#IDComment294505257</link>
<description>If he gets attacked for this, he should punch back twice as hard.  A few months back my ten year old daughter said to me, &amp;quot;Dad, I wish everyone were rich.&amp;quot; and I said to her, &amp;quot;If everyone were rich then no one would be....&amp;quot; and waited for her to finish the sentence. She didn&amp;#039;t get it, so I filled it in for her, &amp;quot;If everyone were rich, then no one would be rich.&amp;quot; She looked at me with a puzzled look and I asked her, &amp;quot;If everyone were rich, who would make your clothes?&amp;quot; and she said, &amp;quot;I would pay someone.&amp;quot; and I said, &amp;quot;But, if they were rich, why would they care?&amp;quot; and she puzzled it out.  I was proud of her. My ten year old daughter is now smarter than most liberals. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-praises-income-inequality/#IDComment294505257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Government Debt Simplified</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/government-debt-simplified/#IDComment293597704</link>
<description>Seems to me like the Republicans are equally to blame here if there is no budget.  If there is no budget, why aren&amp;#039;t they forcing one? They aren&amp;#039;t forcing one because of what happened under Clinton. The government shut down and supposedly, if you believe the media, the Republicans got the blame. So now the Republicans are afraid to do what&amp;#039;s right. Shouldn&amp;#039;t they demand a budget? If we control the House, then there shouldn&amp;#039;t be any allocations of money to spend until there is a budget.  By letting the Democrats and the President get away with this, they are setting a standard for the future where they will have no excuse. If for three years the House Republicans have been going along with no budget, then when it does come time to put the foot down, what are they going to say? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/government-debt-simplified/#IDComment293597704</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Government Debt Simplified</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/government-debt-simplified/#IDComment293593831</link>
<description>I consider myself politically savvy but I honestly do not understand this one.  I do understand what Congress is, and the difference between the House and the Senate. But if you go to wikipedia (Yes, I know, not the most reliable source) it has a web page for the 2012 budget.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_federal_budget&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_United_States_f...&lt;/a&gt;  Here is the key bit:  &amp;quot;The actual appropriations for Fiscal Year 2012 were enacted as three appropriations bills in November and December 2011, in accordance with the United States budget process. In addition, legislation was passed to extend a cut in the Social Security payroll tax for the first two months of calendar year 2012, with a full-year extension currently under discussion in Congress.&amp;quot;  Are appropriation bills not considered a budget?  Seriously, not trying to troll here, just don&amp;#039;t understand the intricacies here. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/government-debt-simplified/#IDComment293593831</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Washington State, New Jersey Pass Same-Sex Marriage</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/washington-state-new-jersey-pass-gay-marriage/#IDComment291911521</link>
<description>All this is about is the destruction of marriage. Fools cannot see past the nose on their face. As to the rest of us, it&amp;#039;s quite clear.  You remember the old saying when you were a kid, &amp;quot;One guy ruined it for all of us.&amp;quot; this is the hope with gay marriage. They don&amp;#039;t want marriage also, they want to abolish the institution all together. It&amp;#039;s like the word Racist. Back in the 80&amp;#039;s when I heard the word racist used, I thought of dirty, evil, frothing at the mouth, backwoods, white trash stringing up black men in trees. Now when I hear the word racist, it goes in one ear and out the other. Back in the 80&amp;#039;s if I heard a woman was raped, I thought of a dark alley, some fat sweaty disgusting man and a poor innocent woman being brutally beaten and sexually assaulted. Now when I hear rape, I think of some half dressed hot chick who got drunk at a party and regretted her actions the next morning.  Have they made Racism and Rape better or worse? You call good people Racist long enough, it doesn&amp;#039;t turn good people into Racists, it turns the word Racist on it&amp;#039;s head.  And this is what they will do with marriage. What is a marriage? Pretty simple, really. 1 adult male, 1 adult female. What if we throw homosexuals into the bunch? 1 adult male and 1 adult male, or 1 adult female and 1 adult female, or 1 adult male and 1 adult female. Anyone think it stops there? What&amp;#039;s the justification for changing the old paradigm? I hear it&amp;#039;s love.  If it&amp;#039;s love, then why only 2 adults? Can&amp;#039;t 3 adults equally love? Why not 4?   Or let&amp;#039;s say we stick with 1 adult married to another adult. Why are they married? Because they love or because they are having sex? If it&amp;#039;s just for love (And not for procreation) then why not two buddies? To male friends or two female friends? I mean, let&amp;#039;s say I live with a friend and he takes care of me. It&amp;#039;s better if we&amp;#039;re married if he&amp;#039;s working because it will lower his taxes, right?  What if i&amp;#039;m in the military, serving overseas, and another guy approaches me and says, &amp;quot;Hey, I would like to immigrate to the United States.&amp;quot; can I just marry him and help him immigrate? Must I have sexual relations with him to be &amp;quot;married&amp;quot; to him?  You see where this is going? Eventually, people will say, &amp;quot;Why do married people get tax breaks? Why do married people get to immigrate? What&amp;#039;s so special about marriage?&amp;quot;  And given enough years down the road the answer will be, &amp;quot;Nothing.&amp;quot; And then they will have won. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/washington-state-new-jersey-pass-gay-marriage/#IDComment291911521</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Laughs At Gregory&#039;s Loaded Single Moms Question</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-laughs-at-gregorys-loaded-single-moms-question/#IDComment291855059</link>
<description>Oh, and another thing, I would say often on these shows, &amp;quot;You know, they told me in elementary school that their were no stupid questions. How wrong they were!&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-laughs-at-gregorys-loaded-single-moms-question/#IDComment291855059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Laughs At Gregory&#039;s Loaded Single Moms Question</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-laughs-at-gregorys-loaded-single-moms-question/#IDComment291854524</link>
<description>If I were the Republican candidate for the President, every time I went in for an interview like this, I would come loaded with lot&amp;#039;s of ammunition. What do this guy say about Sarah Palin when she was running for Vice President and had her family? Was he supportive or did he do news stories highlighting people critical of her for being a working mom?  You have to expect really idiotic questions like this. Which means you need to be ready to throw it back in their face. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-laughs-at-gregorys-loaded-single-moms-question/#IDComment291854524</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck Site Attacks Sarah Palin Over Trig Article, Writer Calls Palin-Supporter &#039;Whore&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/07/beck-site-attacks-sarah-palin-over-trig-article-writer-calls-palin-supporter-whore/#IDComment286710947</link>
<description>I just cannot listen to Glenn Beck anymore. While I find that when he does talk about some things, it&amp;#039;s interesting, he almost never talks about anything anymore. I flick on his radio show in the morning and all I hear is, &amp;quot;Tonight, we&amp;#039;re going to reveal something to you that will shock you. It will amaze you. You won&amp;#039;t believe what we have to show you.&amp;quot; blah blah blah. In essence, he says nothing. He just goes on and on about what he intends to go on and on about, but you have to pay his fee to see/hear it.  With that being said, I don&amp;#039;t take this article as a criticism on Glenn Beck. Just like Andrew Breitbart isn&amp;#039;t responsible for anything Nolte writes, neither is Beck responsible for what this idiot wrote on the Blaze. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/07/beck-site-attacks-sarah-palin-over-trig-article-writer-calls-palin-supporter-whore/#IDComment286710947</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>