264 comments posted · 2 followers · following 1
They claim persecution and oppression (and preach hatred of the kuffars) from the safety of their free-speech-guaranteed pulpits in the Western world, and then go home to dar-al-Islam and then immediately start persecuting and oppressing non-Muslims.
I wonder why? Probably so that when they describe the concept of oppression, they can at least speak from personal experience - if only experience from the wrong side of that equation.
And where is the MSM on this, anyway? Still in raptures about Obama, I suppose.
But since ul-Haq invited the Wahhabis in, the place has gone to the dogs.
And you wonder that the FBI looks to these places to find clues about jihadi terrorist activity?
Hypocrites. I never thought that ACLU, a body devoted to freedom of speech and many other worthy civil rights, would sink so low as to collaborate with CAIR to exclude discussion about Islam and its tenets from mainstream society.
Further, if they don't want all that nasty "Islamophobia" (which, in its essence, boils down to a simple rejection of shariah law by the people already living in the area), then all they have to do is dump their extreme demands - you know, those special holidays, their demands for shariah law, their demands to remove all Christian symoblism from public view, their demand for polygamy and child-brides, and so on and so forth.
It's simple: If you want to be accepted, then make your customs acceptable. Don't expect your host nation to conform to you, as if you're some kind of parasite - no, wait. That's right - Islam is a parasite on the world. I'd forgotten.
Please, do invite that butcher to reside there. I believe that the US Armed Forces would like a word or two with him regarding 3,000 dead civilians.
Saudi Arabia is a slave state, yearly trafficking in thousands of slaves for purposes of domestic servitude, manual labour, sexual servitude and (oddly enough) child-jockeys for camel-racing events. (I know that it sounds like "Murder, Arson and Jaywalking" to include that last, but it is horrific enough to deserve inclusion. On a side note, the UAE deserves some credit for taking firm steps to end that practice.)
For any Muslim to claim that Lincoln was a Muslim is egregious in the extreme. To be sure, he was lukewarm about emancipation (due to Constitutional issues, not lack of compassion for slaves), but eventually agreed to the permanent ban of slavery in the US (Hence, the two Proclamations were dates Sep. 1862 and Jan. 1863, not 1861 - the start of the Civil War). A step that no Muslims would *ever* have taken.
That's just wrong. Everything that Muslims hate - equality, democracy, freedom and justice - he stood up for. That man was no Muslim!!
If anything, this call should serve as a catalyst for the FBI to step-up its investigation and make it more thorough - if the Muslims don't have anything to hide, then why are mosques and medrassahas off-limits to inspectors? They remind me of Saddam during the "searches for WMDs".
Simple: They believe that an American woman's right to have an abortion-on-demand and a 100% pay equality with men is far more important than their Pakistani sisters' rights to even have legal identities, or be safe from marital rape, etc. etc.
Don't get me wrong: I *do* believe that pay equality is a good thing. I *do* believe that whatever your stance on abortion rights, it is an issue that needs to be discussed. But priorities, NARAL, priorities. Defeat the greater evil before tackling the far lesser evil, not after.