<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/682007</link>
		<description>Comments by Arlo1Guthrey</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48610748</link>
<description>No, you still have the freedom of choice; for now. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48610748</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48606966</link>
<description>Making big oil pay their own way would be capitalism, and even though the Constitution gives Congress the authority to hire &amp;quot;private armies and navies&amp;quot; the totalitarialist wet the pants at the thought of private armies being able to kick their azz out of office, reference Hugo Chavez and his nationalizing oil in Venezuela. So it would be &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot; for the oil companies to have to support themselves.  Hey de facto, they pay less money in bribes than they would for quality security forces.  Why pay more when you can bribe a political party to protest and launch investigations and of course screw the American taxpayer to pay for their international (non-American) operational security. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48606966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48605500</link>
<description>They will go the way of the do-do bird (pun intended) even if the &amp;quot;Self-Chosen One&amp;quot; throws some tax and spend dollars their way.  Business 101, don&amp;#039;t screw the customer.  The average American gets really P-O&amp;#039;ed when they get their money screwed with, and that they will remember. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48605500</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48604706</link>
<description>FOX would still have more viewers. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48604706</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48604465</link>
<description>Wanda or Ellen &amp;quot;doin&amp;quot; the news?  Are you referring to Gibbs or the Chosen One himself?  Never mind, REALLY bad visual.  Eeeeeewwwwhh!!!! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48604465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48601871</link>
<description>You MUST be a double wolf ( you probably chewed both arms off so that if &amp;quot;Katy&amp;quot; cam looking for a one armed dude she wouldn&amp;#039;t find you; other wise you would have a hand to take care of &amp;quot;hard times&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48601871</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48601113</link>
<description>Right On! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48601113</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48600664</link>
<description>Too late, what the the nutty &amp;quot;liberal / propaganda/ news business/journalist&amp;quot; professors don&amp;#039;t teach (because they don&amp;#039;t know) is that once you screw over a customer they won&amp;#039;t come back.---ABC, who? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48600664</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48600137</link>
<description>Hey you know her.  She was the Lamestream mouthpiece that went after Sara, miss &amp;quot;what news papers do you read?: dits. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48600137</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : ACORN Document Dump: Citibank Jeopardizes Customers for ACORN</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/12/10/acorn-document-dump-citibank-jeopardizes-customers-for-acorn/#IDComment46581201</link>
<description>Political corruption like this has always been a factor in American politics; it&amp;rsquo;s intrinsic in the political party system.  The problem for both the Dems and Repubs is that with the internet they can&amp;rsquo;t hide it anymore; not from citizens and not from foreign powers.  Remember when the Russians offered to monitor our elections after the &amp;ldquo;Orange Revolution&amp;rdquo; in the Ukrain?  Perhaps they know something and aren&amp;rsquo;t telling us, yet.  Maybe a little &amp;ldquo;Orange Revolution&amp;rdquo; is in our future; oh and remember, the Brits are our friends to.  Just a little dose of paranoia for the politicians; maybe they will wonder who else is watching.  Sometimes I&amp;#039;m so bad; but I am so good at it. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/12/10/acorn-document-dump-citibank-jeopardizes-customers-for-acorn/#IDComment46581201</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46360720</link>
<description>Praying would be nice also.  I think God is the onlt real answer. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46360720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46360253</link>
<description>And get Curly Moe Biden for a follow up?  I don&amp;#039;t think so.  How about we trot out the long form of the birth certificate that shows he&amp;#039;s not an American citizen (even if he is I&amp;#039;m sure the CIA could hook us up, I mean he is one of their favorites).  If he is ineligible to be pres then all of the laws he signs and all of the &amp;quot;Treaties&amp;quot; (Climate Strange) would be null and void.  As would his VP and Sec State.  Mmmm, Ron Paul for speaker of the house in 2010, anyone buying? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46360253</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359775</link>
<description>And get Curly Moe Biden for a follow up?  I don&amp;#039;t think so.  How about we trot out the long form of the birth certificate that shows he&amp;#039;s not an American citizen (even if he is I&amp;#039;m sure the CIA could hook us up, I mean he is one of their favorites).  If he is ineligible to be pres then all of the laws he signs and all of the &amp;quot;Treaties&amp;quot; (Climate Strange) would be null and void.  As would his VP and Sec State.  Mmmm, Ron Paul for speaker of the house in 2010, anyone buying? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359775</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359650</link>
<description>And get Curly Moe Biden for a follow up?  I don&amp;#039;t think so.  How about we trot out the long form of the birth certificate that shows he&amp;#039;s not an American citizen (even if he is I&amp;#039;m sure the CIA could hook us up, I mean he is one of their favorites).  If he is ineligible to be pres then all of the laws he signs and all of the &amp;quot;Treaties&amp;quot; (Climate Strange) would be null and void.  As would his VP and Sec State.  Mmmm, Ron Paul for speaker of the house in 2010, anyone buying? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359650</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359067</link>
<description>You know, I was thinking, how about we trot out the long form of the birth certificate that shows he&amp;#039;s not an American citizen (even if he is, I&amp;#039;m sure the CIA could hook us up, I mean he is one of their favorites).  If he is ineligible to be pres then all of the laws he signs and all of the &amp;quot;Treaties&amp;quot; (Climate Strange) would be null and void.  As would his VP and Sec State.  Mmmm, Ron Paul for speaker of the house in 2010, anyone buying? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46359067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46357819</link>
<description>And the differnce would be????????????????? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46357819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46356792</link>
<description>And get Curly Moe Biden for a follow up? I don&amp;#039;t think so. How about we trot out the long form of the berth certificate that shows he&amp;#039;s not an American citizen (even if he is I&amp;#039;m sure the CIA could hook us up). If he is inelegable to be pres then all of the laws he signs and all of the &amp;quot;Treaties&amp;quot; (Climate Strange) would be null and void. As would his VP and Sec State. Mmmm, Ron Paul for speaker of the house in 2010, anyone buying? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46356792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46355270</link>
<description>We would have to fight a second civil war to get the through. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46355270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46352571</link>
<description>For all the people that want the Obamnation impeached, this is the village idiot we would be stuck with.  I wonder if the democrats were thinking of the when he was chosen for VP? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46352571</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: \&#039;spend our way out\&#039; of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46352368</link>
<description>Actually I think we did that under Carter.  It was called taxpayer fitigue.  The IRS was so behind on trying to catch people that they told congress it was a lost cause.  MMmmmm. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46352368</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>