<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/880873</link>
		<description>Comments by AriTai</description>
<item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Romney Considering Condi?</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/07/13/romney-considering-condi-rice/#IDComment401407305</link>
<description>I think (hope) he&amp;#039;s just warming folks up for his real pick, Ms. P. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 05:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/07/13/romney-considering-condi-rice/#IDComment401407305</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Resurfacing of Jeremiah Wright</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/05/17/jeremiah-wright-resurfaces/#IDComment362782935</link>
<description>re: religion.  I think so.  Call it preparing the battlefield, putting the campaign and its surrogates on notice of what hellfire will fall on them when they challenge or ridicule Mr. Romney&amp;#039;s faith.  Including an army of independent allies of enough substance that they only have to mention the amount and post the storyboards, if not the actual ad, on youtube.  Where&amp;#039;s my popcorn?  Chicago is about to discover Main Street America remembers how to use tar-and-feathers. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/05/17/jeremiah-wright-resurfaces/#IDComment362782935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Memo To Chuck Todd and NBC: Your Science Coverage Is Awful, Too</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61386813</link>
<description>re: discount rate:  think about goods we value and use today that we bought 100 years ago.    Or things we&amp;rsquo;d purchase today that we expect will have significant value in 100 years.   Consider that it took (just) 20-30 years for Lake Erie to be mostly cleaned up - and the Cuyahoga to stop burning.   Ditto for the LA basin where the air leaving a modern car engine has long been cleaner than it was on entry.  The Panama canal is being rebuilt, it may just make it to its 100 year anniversary.  In a 100 years, the new one will likely be refit if not abandoned when technology and even less-expensive energy changes the rules again.  It&amp;#039;s important to be humble about what we see beyond our headlights.  Especially when the next catastrophe happens and we find &amp;quot;if only we&amp;#039;d been more aggressive about growth more of the population would have survived because of ...&amp;quot; (plot death by wealth per type of disaster, natural and man-made). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61386813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Memo To Chuck Todd and NBC: Your Science Coverage Is Awful, Too</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61385229</link>
<description>re: better reporting.   Editors should teach some basic economics documenting alongside the risk thermometer the implied &amp;quot;discount rate&amp;quot; the author has used to justify their recommendations. E.g. AGW must have a zero or even negative discount rate to justify the austerity and poverty demanded for the redemptive efforts.  Yet most of these authors have little tolerance for preemptive warfare to remove a threat, where the discount rate is historically negative (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, ...Chavez).     Where a non-zero (positive) discount rate suggests that we need not be too concerned with any investment we make today having an impact on those 3-4-5 generations removed.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61385229</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Memo To Chuck Todd and NBC: Your Science Coverage Is Awful, Too</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61383051</link>
<description>re: Alar, Alarm, Alarum, the-sky-is-falling, repent!  A pity that editors of all these -zines don&amp;#039;t require every story that highlights some risk have a couple of thermometers that have symbols on them indicating the probability of any given risk on a few important populations, including all-of-us, middle-class-U.S.-citizens, children and lastly those-claimed-to-be-most-at-risk, where the thermometer has gradations from the absolute certainty that we all will die, to deaths due to, say, an airplane falling on your head (about six a year, iirc).  The editor doesn&amp;#039;t have to put it on the same page - they could put all the analysis charts back with the legal notices and not harm the adrenaline hit they are dependent on for sales.  They&amp;#039;d even get more advertising revenue since maybe a third would be interested in &amp;quot;the rest of the story&amp;quot; and flip to the back pages (similar to answers to puzzles).     Granted, people will tire after a while when they discover few, if any risks, rise to the level of dying from a crashing airplane.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/03/09/memo-to-chuck-todd-and-nbc-your-science-coverage-is-awful-too/#IDComment61383051</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>