<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/346663</link>
		<description>Comments by AndrewKStein</description>
<item>
<title>Andrew Wolk : Social Movement Innovation</title>
<link>http://andrewwolk.com/2009/03/10/social-movement-innovation/#IDComment16708482</link>
<description>Good points.  I&amp;#039;m wondering, where are the experts in social sector collaboration?  Does  Root Cause have an M&amp;amp;A department? ...  I&amp;#039;ve always liked the story of GE (at least as I&amp;#039;ve heard it), how the company began acquiring so many other companies that it could analyze its acquisitions for M&amp;amp;A best practices.  Soon one of GE&amp;#039;s advantages was that it could acquire companies more efficiently than its competitors.  As a result, it could bid higher and more often, knowing that  it could squeeze that much more out of the acquisition -- or abstain, knowing that the acquisition was less attractive than CW would say. ...  The idea, then, is that perhaps a social organization&amp;#039;s theory of impact needs to include how well it works with others -- and its plan for continuously getting better at collaboration....  Assuming this hasn&amp;#039;t been done yet, I&amp;#039;d like to think that if we surveyed the social sector and looked for organizations demonstratively better at collaboration, we could prove a correlation between excellent collaborative skills and social impact. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://andrewwolk.com/2009/03/10/social-movement-innovation/#IDComment16708482</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>