<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/345356</link>
		<description>Comments by AlbionAegis</description>
<item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Why May? Why not June or even July?</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/825-why-may-why-not-june-or-even-july#IDComment139625804</link>
<description>By the end of May there will have been several national-direction relavent events.  The Royal Wedding is in April so by early May we will know if that passed peacefully or if trouble was caused by &amp;#039;anarchists&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;foreign elements&amp;#039;, or &amp;#039;tiny minority of extremists&amp;#039; from a certain alleged &amp;#039;religion of peace&amp;#039;. If bad things happen at the wedding it could galvanise the public. There is a practical limit to what the police (and other government bodies) could stop if the public got angry and took matters in to their own hands in the (then belated) defence of the country. Simple and quick actions would be most effective. The hard part will be being despised afterwards by the very fellow countrymen you acted to protect if they are not also enraged by actions against our country. If it comes to that, which it may not.  The alternative vote (AV) referendum will be in early May. The result will show public opinion of politics to an extent.  The referendum will show whether public&amp;#039;s opinion is obeyed by government. Will there be a second referendum to get the &amp;#039;right answer this time&amp;#039; as Ireland had? Could it be a wedge forming a crack, making room to push for a further referendum on other matters (terminating european union membership, end to race replacement immigration, etc)? If AV passes, then people will feel they have more choice. Whether the statistics reported after elections will report tallies for all the choices, or just winners, remains to be seen. Assuming the status quo is not compromised, the current mainstream parties will still likely end up with the majority of seats regardless of whether the public voices a &amp;#039;yes&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;no&amp;#039; on May 5th.  Various local government and council elections will show whether political means have any remaining viability. Vote results would give show if the footwork done has worked. The elections can also bring to light new smear campaign approaches used against candidates. Expose the dirty trickery to the public by anonymous leaflets to let them know the skullduggery the candidates (and their parties) used against friend and foe alike (thought hate each other almost as much as they hate us).  Although I agree that the weather would be better by summer! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/825-why-may-why-not-june-or-even-july#IDComment139625804</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Has the Chairman of the BNP gone insane?</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/752-has-the-chairman-of-the-bnp-gone-insane#IDComment134284043</link>
<description>The sooner Britain is set back on a non-downward direction the less pain will be needed to save the country. It seemed to me that the BNP would not get elected by the population soon enough to minimise pain.  Discredited, hated by the media, with people believing bad things about the party. Sometime the greater good, the quickest way to achieve longer term goals, is needed. What better way than to secure assets, dissolve the BNP, it&amp;#039;s have membership and leadership publically bemoan the BNP&amp;#039;s dwindling fate, the media would jump all over it and make the public believe that the BNP were gone, and more importantly that the media-fueled negative stigmas were gone.  A new nationalist party then arises. Not called the BNP for obvious reasons.  It would need a name that evoked national pride (probably without mentioning &amp;#039;nationalism&amp;#039; to prevent enemies replacing it with negative words beginning with the letter n). A name that included &amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;British Isles&amp;quot;, and / or  &amp;quot;British&amp;quot;. A name not too complex, nor silly sounding, nor with media exploitable acronyms.  A fresh party has no history (niether good nor bad), stewarded with no figureheads with a past the media can easily fling mud about. Likely requiring the BNP&amp;#039;s public figures to NOT play a connectable public part, else risk the media saying &amp;#039;this is just the new BNP&amp;#039;. Perhaps keeping non-traceable advisor roles, supporting in spirit, and votes.  The BNP supporters would see the new party&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Britain first&amp;quot; spirit and approach, naturally liking it. Quite possibly they would be aware what it was in all but name and form what they have already supported. The rest of population could take one look at &amp;quot;Britain first&amp;quot; and compare with the current state of affairs in the country (destruction of family, morality, industry, prospects, and so forth). What reason would they have to not vote for the new party, unless they despised Britain and its people?  Sadly whether waiting for next general election is a good idea is a different matter entirely. For the greater good, things may need to be brought forward. The situation that requires that would likely be external. Do any of you reading this honestly believe that another 4 years of the current approaches is safe given the state of the country and the rest of the world? But that is a different matter. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/752-has-the-chairman-of-the-bnp-gone-insane#IDComment134284043</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Barclaycard: Adding Insult to Injury</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/barclaycard-adding-insult-to-injury/#IDComment63574896</link>
<description>The same Barclays that, to avoid taking money from the UK government, was bailed out by Middle Eastern investors?  Perhaps this green and pleasant land should have financial institutions with eyes (and ears!) closer to home. A bank is liable to shareholders and interested (no pun intended) in vast profit, so a building society would probably be a better choice.  British Isles Building Society.  Serving communities by employing local people. Paying staff sensible and decent wages (no &amp;pound;2/hr exploitation or &amp;pound;15M/pa nonsense). Financial policies which add up, are transparent (could be done by any family with a pocket calculator), and don&amp;#039;t use word tricks like &amp;#039;sub prime&amp;#039; to hide when they&amp;#039;ve messed up their numbers. Sensible lending (eg. don&amp;#039;t let people borrow more than they can repay, at fair rates - no need for 30% interest when no shareholders to drink champagne) Financial gains used to pay costs (staff, premises, B2B services, etc), provide capital to boost lending capability, and surplus to give a modest return to savers (ultimately, if you can put &amp;pound;10 in and be able to take &amp;pound;10 out again, at least you havn&amp;#039;t lost anything unlike with some banks nowadays), again with transparency for members and the public.  Perhaps a kind reader with experience of the finance world could see what the Financial Services Authority and Building Societies Association would require for it to become a reality? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/barclaycard-adding-insult-to-injury/#IDComment63574896</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Behind the Pretence of Tolerance</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/10/behind-the-pretence-of-tolerance/#IDComment37548551</link>
<description>I also noticed an audio link missing from the Analysis pages, but a google search found the audio for me. At time of writing (07 Oct 09 01:08) audio is available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/b00mw2nh&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.bbc.co.uk/i/b00mw2nh&lt;/a&gt;   (I linked the audio in an comment earlier this evening, repeating here in case Revisionist missed it, and for others browsing through to hear if they prefer listening to reading) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/10/behind-the-pretence-of-tolerance/#IDComment37548551</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Behind the Pretence of Tolerance</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/10/behind-the-pretence-of-tolerance/#IDComment37530067</link>
<description>Link to audio: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/b00mw2nh&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.bbc.co.uk/i/b00mw2nh&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/10/behind-the-pretence-of-tolerance/#IDComment37530067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : BNP Wins First European MEP in Yorkshire and Humberside Region</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/06/bnp-wins-first-european-mep-in-yorkshire-and-humberside-region/#IDComment23599060</link>
<description>Congratulations Andrew. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/06/bnp-wins-first-european-mep-in-yorkshire-and-humberside-region/#IDComment23599060</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Selling off the family silver</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/selling-off-the-family-silver/#IDComment17624192</link>
<description>I wonder how many public services you could buy back if you took the money back from the execs, top bankers, corrupt politicians (2nd house allowance? should more like shared accomodation with other MPs methinks - or do they revile their own kind too much?) and other head-in-the-clouds city types. Include all the money the illegal immigrants and benefit cheats are swimming in, and you could probably even the odd train arrive on time! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/selling-off-the-family-silver/#IDComment17624192</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Why the New &ldquo;Anti-Terrorism&rdquo; Strategy Will Fail &mdash; And Why Only the BNP has the Ans</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567268</link>
<description>If people are so worried about BNP policies why doesn&amp;#039;t the BNP make it&amp;#039;s policies publically known and legally binding? Then people can&amp;#039;t keep turning round and playing the same old cards against the BNP - because the policies won&amp;#039;t match the accusations. Draw out clearly worded documents, leave them with a solicitor, and agree that if the policies are willfully breached without very good reason then the gov&amp;#039;t forfeits it&amp;#039;s time in office and a new election is called. Not a bad idea to apply that to ALL political parties really... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567268</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Why the New &ldquo;Anti-Terrorism&rdquo; Strategy Will Fail &mdash; And Why Only the BNP has the Ans</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567136</link>
<description>10 planes out to 1 plane back. Would be a step towards reverting to sensible population balances. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567136</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Why the New &ldquo;Anti-Terrorism&rdquo; Strategy Will Fail &mdash; And Why Only the BNP has the Ans</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567027</link>
<description>It would only take one person to cause chaos. They wouldn&amp;#039;t even need real nuclear material. A few of the ubiquitous radiation symbol amongst the debris would set off panic. It would take only a short time with suitable equipment to see there was nothing extra beyond normal background radiation radiation. Even if authorities later told the public that no nuclear material was present, would the public believe it or would they think there was a cover up? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17567027</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Why the New &ldquo;Anti-Terrorism&rdquo; Strategy Will Fail &mdash; And Why Only the BNP has the Ans</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17566772</link>
<description>There was something in the recesses of the media a while ago about Islamic forums and plots to target MPs.  It would be very surprising if the Commons hasn&amp;#039;t been warned that almost any of them could be a target. Maybe it wouldn&amp;#039;t have been politically correct to bring up the topic.  Perhaps they are hoping the &amp;#039;tiny minority of extremists&amp;#039; will be held in check by the &amp;#039;moderate majority&amp;#039; (or at least the moderates will take their time gearing up the extremists), or telling themselves that it would never happen. It was likely said that they would never have the balls to try and bomb a capital city too, and we know how that turned out.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/why-the-new-&ldquo;anti-terrorism&rdquo;-strategy-will-fail-&mdash;-and-why-only-the-bnp-has-the-answer-to-the-terrorist-threat/#IDComment17566772</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : BNP Says Shut the Doors: 500 Migrants per Day Will Drown Britain</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/bnp-says-shut-the-doors-500-migrants-per-day-will-drown-britain/#IDComment17566519</link>
<description>Hello Albacore, hopefully the following steps will point you in the right direction:  1. Start by registering on the Intense Debate website ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://intensedebate.com/signup&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://intensedebate.com/signup&lt;/a&gt; ).  2. Once you are registerd you need to login before posting (click the &amp;quot;Login to comment&amp;quot; button, it&amp;#039;s at the top of the comments section).  3a. To reply to someone click &amp;quot;Post Reply&amp;quot; next to a comment, type your reply text into the box that appears, then click &amp;quot;Submit comment&amp;quot;.  3b. To add a new comment to an article (that is not a reply to a comment) go to the &amp;quot;Post new comment&amp;quot; box at the bottom of the comments section, type your comment text into the box, and then click &amp;quot;Submit comment&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/bnp-says-shut-the-doors-500-migrants-per-day-will-drown-britain/#IDComment17566519</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Third World Immigration Brings Nightmare to London&rsquo;s Inner City Schools</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-brings-nightmare-to-london&rsquo;s-inner-city-schools/#IDComment17243094</link>
<description>If the police sit unacting for long enough vigiliantes might spring up, outside the law against those outside the law, taking the terror and violence back to the gangs.  Maybe not though, it&amp;#039;s one thing for someone to take on adults, quite another for the acknowledgement of the threat a child with a gun poses to override the horror of acting against a child.  If we Brits weren&amp;#039;t so soft in the first place we wouldn&amp;#039;t be in this much of a mess, but that said, if we weren&amp;#039;t so soft would Britain have been as friendly a palce to live to begin with? Tricky. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-brings-nightmare-to-london&rsquo;s-inner-city-schools/#IDComment17243094</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/06/labour-mp-predicts-total-islamification-of-britain/#IDComment17241975</link>
<description>Those &amp;#039;proud achievement&amp;#039;s Malik mentioned, who here would bet that he is keeping count from before early 97? Fifty two &amp;#039;proud achievements&amp;#039; in just one summer day for the likes of Malik and his friends. Who can forget the &amp;#039;proud achievement&amp;#039; of al-Muhajiroun in Luton earlier this month.  He openly declares he wants the country to be Islamic, is nervous for a moment catching himself as he wonders if he has said too much despite being surrounded by the local ummah, then laughs it off realising he could&amp;#039;ve said (for example) he wanted to put every last British man, woman and child and a boat and let it drift out to sea and nothing would be done against him. Heck, he would probably be given his own council house (a second home, naturally paid for by taxpayers) next to a cleric who &amp;#039;shares his faith&amp;#039; and put on extra benefits for life (incidentally I wonder if benefits is translated as jizya for Islamic language leaflets?).  The informed of Britain can not say they were not warned - although many can claim to be powerless to do much effective to counter things under the current climate, June elections not withstanding. The average Britain who knows nothing about what goes on against their country would have their jaw hit the floor if all of it were made public. The invaders have not seen the British when they get angry as a nation. Those who would destroy these isles should be careful - a dropped glass breaks and those piece can be awkwardly sharp. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/06/labour-mp-predicts-total-islamification-of-britain/#IDComment17241975</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Third World Immigration Brings Nightmare to London&rsquo;s Inner City Schools</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-brings-nightmare-to-london&rsquo;s-inner-city-schools/#IDComment17241406</link>
<description>In isolation a the percentage that makes up an ethnic group may be a minority in the overall mix. When minorities make up the majority of the mix, no one can speak out or else the individual ethnic groups will say they are being picked on.  When 5 out of 6 children are not indigenous, the natives become the minority there. Open doors immigation policy can not continue. Either it is stopped by common sense, the country becomes so backward no on wants to come here, or the people realise what hass happened and take steps to close the doors.  The ruling elites won&amp;#039;t dare admit that the third worlders have brought third world behaviour and standards to this country for risk of losing power and the danger of backlash towards any people of third world origin (unfair or otherwise).   Black and Asian pupils may outnumber white British children by about six to four, but they probably outnumber teaching staff 40 or 50 to 1. Not a great environment to educate willing school kids, let alone unwilling ones.  We do not want gangs of youths roaming the streets, armed, immune to police action or prosecution due to their skin colour or language, violent, and threatening to anyone not in their gang (and likely even some within the gang false-family).  The British sit back forever and hope the powers that be will use their power to fix things. LibLabCon don&amp;#039;t seem to know or care about the problem the public sees - sees with an eye half closed, since the media dare not report it in the first place!  For the benefit of readers here, especially those who worry about the state of the communities they live in, how would the BNP go about reducing the gang culture and ethnic imbalances (ie. making sure the native British are not side lined in Britain) in those communities? (Going beyond kicking out the large handful whose families are in the country illegally anyway, of course.) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-brings-nightmare-to-london&rsquo;s-inner-city-schools/#IDComment17241406</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Third World Immigration Is Destroying the NHS</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-is-destroying-the-nhs/#IDComment17215640</link>
<description>Hello Louis,  Can I just say thank you for looking after patients in your NHS area, and good for you for not giving up!  If they are so grossly incompetent of plain unwilling to act in the best interests of patients in matters of hygiene then to keep them is risking lives.  Follow the official procedures about warning staff to follow medical standards *I don&amp;#039;t know what they are but I expect they exist), and keep a paper trail. If you do the same treatment and paper trail for all related matters towards your staff then you can&amp;#039;t be said to be picking out anyone in particular.  Good luck. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-is-destroying-the-nhs/#IDComment17215640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Third World Immigration Is Destroying the NHS</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-is-destroying-the-nhs/#IDComment17215435</link>
<description>Anonymous tip offs might help, if they don&amp;#039;t know who sent it they can&amp;#039;t call the whistle blower racist. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/third-world-immigration-is-destroying-the-nhs/#IDComment17215435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : New Sensational Items from Excalibur</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/new-sensational-items-from-excalibur/#IDComment17215327</link>
<description>Then send them the other way, into the future (and just enough to the west for the &amp;quot;free swimming lessons&amp;quot; to be of use). Future generations would have to deal with them anyway, but at least they wouldn&amp;#039;t have any chance to out breed the Brits in the mean time! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/new-sensational-items-from-excalibur/#IDComment17215327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: 43 year old Muslim cleric who married 12 year-old girl has &quot;outraged civic groups&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025299.php#IDComment17215182</link>
<description>Which will dominate, state law or Islam? Which will the judges sigh wearily and make a second decision on after rioting about the first decision? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025299.php#IDComment17215182</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The British National Party : Polish Trade Unions Demand Bar on Foreign Workers Entering that Country</title>
<link>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/polish-trade-unions-demand-bar-on-foreign-workers-entering-that-country/#IDComment17214922</link>
<description>Cons with answers? Nonsense! Only smarties have the answers ;) (For those who have forgotten smarties, they were small little brightly coated chocolates.) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/polish-trade-unions-demand-bar-on-foreign-workers-entering-that-country/#IDComment17214922</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>