<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2197250</link>
		<description>Comments by Aeoue</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Why the Left-Wing Hates Mormons and How to Respond</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/cjohnson/2012/03/01/why-the-left-wing-hates-mormons-and-how-to-respond/#IDComment306119355</link>
<description>Well said.  In these times, it is important that all of us who share common values stand together despite theological differences to preserve the kinds of communities we want our children to grow up in and preserve an atmosphere where we can all worship freely without the encroaching hostility of modern secular society. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/cjohnson/2012/03/01/why-the-left-wing-hates-mormons-and-how-to-respond/#IDComment306119355</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305589640</link>
<description>By the way, I tend to agree with you on Ron Paul.  He&amp;#039;s a Libertarian running as a Republican.  It seems that many people don&amp;#039;t understand that while conservatives and libertarians agree an many things, libertarians are not conservatives and vice-versa. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305589640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305581191</link>
<description>So far in all the primaries combined, Romney has 40% to 23% for Santorum and 21% for Gingrich which amounts to fairly solid support so far for Romney.  I think what you say would be true if there were a viable alternative such as Gov. Daniels, Senator Demint, Gov. Jindal or even younger guys like Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio or Mike Lee, but Gingrich and Santorum are non-starters.  I like both of these men and appreciate the contributions they&amp;#039;ve made to the country, but as presidential candidates, they have too many fatal flaws to list.  In that sense they represent a threat to me because both would be a gift to Obama. Romney is a good, if not great candidate.   There are no skeletons, he&amp;#039;s been well-vetted and some of the things he&amp;#039;s said and done in the past that we conservatives take issue with, will probably help him with centrists in the general election.  He has the experience and organizational/managerial skills to be a great President if he listens to the right voices and he&amp;#039;s mostly been saying the right things for the past few years.  Keep the focus on the economy and he&amp;#039;ll win easily, but give Obama a chance to shift the conversation away to social issues or to a personality contest and you energize the democrat base and scare many moderates to the left. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305581191</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305563287</link>
<description>Not when he starts out by attacking Romney for not supporting the automaker bailout. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment305563287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney Sweep</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304249163</link>
<description>Thank you. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304249163</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney Sweep</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304248540</link>
<description>Better than the Republican candidates all over the country trying to attack the Democrats over Fannie and Freddie with Gingrich as the nominee or going after union corruption with Santorum. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304248540</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney Sweep</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304247145</link>
<description>Get the hell off these boards you loser.  You&amp;#039;d rather see your predictions vindicated than Obama lose. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-wins-all-29-az-delegates/#IDComment304247145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304075148</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t think a brokered convention is a realistic option.  It won&amp;#039;t happen, and even if it does, there really isn&amp;#039;t anyone available who everybody&amp;#039;s going to get excited and unified over that would be able to magically put together an organization in a few short weeks.  We&amp;#039;re much better off making do with what we have.   I&amp;#039;m concerned not so much about Romney Care as I am about some of the previous strong statements he&amp;#039;s made in favor of abortion rights, gun control and a few other issues that make him look disengenuous.  While I think he looks Presidential and inspires a certain amount of trust, he doesn&amp;#039;t really connect on an emotional level.  He is a flawed candidate.   On the other hand, he finished up his term as governor on mostly conservative notes and has mostly been saying the right things for the past few years.  He looks good, is pretty articulate, genuinely decent I think and appeals to the center.  I don&amp;#039;t think there&amp;#039;s any question he&amp;#039;s a competent manager and has sort of a genius for organization.  I&amp;#039;m not super excited about Romney, but I am excited about the beating Obama and having both houses of Congress.   Believe me when I tell you that they will only be able to make and issue of Romney&amp;#039;s mormonism if we let them.  Mormon&amp;#039;s have been an important part of the American landscape for what, nearly 200 years now?  If we all put our foot down with one voice and tell them to leave religion out of it, they will, but my fear is that there are some on our side who would like to see, as you say it &amp;quot;harm&amp;quot; come to Mormonism, even more than they would like to see Obama defeated. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304075148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304051898</link>
<description>Ha, ha.  Sorry I coundn&amp;#039;t resist that last one.  Say hi to your mom for me. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304051898</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304036633</link>
<description>He says while sitting around in his underwear in his mother&amp;#039;s basement...tick, tick, tick... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304036633</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304033466</link>
<description>I can agree with you that we should have a better candidate, one who is conservative that also has leadership skills and an attractive personality, but there is no use crying over spilled milk.  At this point, we need someone who has a chance to get a majority in the general election, can run a competent administration and sign all those bills that will come out of the newly minted, conservative majority we&amp;#039;ll have in both houses.  Romney is acceptable in this sense while Gingrich and Santorum have no realistic chance of winning.   If you want to make this about bigotry toward mormons, and quibble over theological fine points, Obama will win and America will lose in a very profound and irreversible way. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304033466</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304025139</link>
<description>Yes, I think he knows that.  Ask Newt.  But calling your opponent out for his tactics is also part of the game. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment304025139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Disgraced Spitzer &#039;Terrified&#039; Of Santorum</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303849875</link>
<description>Didn&amp;#039;t think so. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303849875</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment303845474</link>
<description>Believe me Samwise007, if the Republicans really want to nominate Santorum, the libs at HuffPo and Daily Kos will do nothing to interfere.  As the old saying goes,  &amp;quot;when your enemy is in the process of destroying himself, stay out of his way.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment303845474</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Romney: Santorum Robocalls &#039;A New Low&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment303840543</link>
<description>Lied about what?? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/romney-santorum-robocalls-a-new-low/#IDComment303840543</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Disgraced Spitzer &#039;Terrified&#039; Of Santorum</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303837327</link>
<description>Well, a sock does look an awful lot like a condom. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303837327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Disgraced Spitzer &#039;Terrified&#039; Of Santorum</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303834819</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Rick Santorum is the only &amp;#039;real&amp;#039; conservative...and the only one...not in bed with NWO types and/or their money!&amp;quot;  I guess that doesn&amp;#039;t include the labor unions. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgraced-eliot-spitzer-terrified-of-santorum/#IDComment303834819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Must See: &#039;My Apology To President Karzai&#039; </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/must-see-my-apology-to-president-karzai/#IDComment302540257</link>
<description>Tell it like it is Kira!  There&amp;#039;s no better medicine than the truth. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/must-see-my-apology-to-president-karzai/#IDComment302540257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Mitt Scores AZ Gov Brewer Endorsement</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/mitt-scores-az-gov-brewer-endorsement/#IDComment302426524</link>
<description>Thanks Mr. Axelrod </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 02:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/mitt-scores-az-gov-brewer-endorsement/#IDComment302426524</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Mitt Scores AZ Gov Brewer Endorsement</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/mitt-scores-az-gov-brewer-endorsement/#IDComment302423811</link>
<description>Tried that in 2008 and it hasn&amp;#039;t worked out so well for us, or the country.  I personally voted libertarian rather than for McCain, although I consider myself to be a conservative and not necessarily a libertarian.  We can&amp;#039;t afford to do it again.   A vote for Romney is not a vote for Obama.  Excuse me for saying it, but that is simply irrational and frankly stupid. The next congress will be the most conservative in modern history, but there will not be a veto proof Republican majority.  If Obama wins, he will veto whatever legislation comes across his desk and then with the help of the press, demonize the &amp;quot;extremists in congress&amp;quot;.  Americans will get sick of the gridlock, and our chance will pass for another generation.   Romney would run a well-organized and competent administration which could be counted on to sign into law whatever legislation comes out of congress.  Of the remaining Republican candidates, I favor Romney, but will get behind whoever the nominee is with all my heart.  We have to win this election. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/mitt-scores-az-gov-brewer-endorsement/#IDComment302423811</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>