<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1166064</link>
		<description>Comments by AKMeyers</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305671177</link>
<description>Not at all.  One of the things I liked about his journalism is that he could be just as critical of the conservatives who supported his viewpoint as he was of the liberals who didn&amp;#039;t  and he did both in a way that was fair and rarely if ever used subjective editing of film, quotes, etc.  I actually think he made the democratic party better, by identifying the worst of them, and helping to move them out.  Corruption exists in every political party, and the second you start believing otherwise is the second they know you can be taken advantage of.  I think he understood that better than most. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305671177</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305542021</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not republican or conservative but what you&amp;#039;re saying right now is just trash.  At the very least the man had integrity and he gave a damn, even if I disagreed with him 95% of the time.  What the hell have you done lately? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305542021</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Tosh.0&#039; Review: Repulsive, Offensive, Politically Incorrect and Undeniably Hilarious</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment298932781</link>
<description>except Tosh doesn&amp;#039;t steal jokes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDmaG1-H25M&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDmaG1-H25M&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/21/tosh-0-review-repulsive-offensive-politically-incorrect-and-undeniably-hilarious/#IDComment298932781</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : A Second Look at Clint Eastwood and &#039;J. Edgar&#039;: Conservatives Too Quick to Judge Free-Thinking Direc</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/02/21/a-second-look-at-clint-eastwood-and-j-edgar-conservatives-too-quick-to-judge-free-thinking-director/#IDComment298280489</link>
<description>I know im going o take my lumps for saying this, but isn&amp;#039;t it possible to be pro gay rights, and pro abortion, yet otherwise conservative about everything else?  Why does it have to be all one or all the other? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/zleeman/2012/02/21/a-second-look-at-clint-eastwood-and-j-edgar-conservatives-too-quick-to-judge-free-thinking-director/#IDComment298280489</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Byron York: Why Does HBO&#039;s &#039;Game Change&#039; Focus All Its Fire on Sarah Palin?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/21/byron-york-why-does-hbos-game-change-focus-all-its-fire-on-sarah-palin/#IDComment298274515</link>
<description>Because who in their right mind is going to watch a movie about john mccain?   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/21/byron-york-why-does-hbos-game-change-focus-all-its-fire-on-sarah-palin/#IDComment298274515</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood Still Eager to Cut Checks for Obama</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/15/hollywood-still-eager-to-cut-checks-for-obama/#IDComment293492061</link>
<description>This just in.  People spend money to serve their own interest.  Shocker!  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/15/hollywood-still-eager-to-cut-checks-for-obama/#IDComment293492061</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace 3D&#039; Review: Jar Jar Aside, Prequel Still Has Merit</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292387518</link>
<description>Seriously, Are we really going to bypass the whole, anakin born by immaculate conception thing?  And the dialogue?  Jar Jar binks is nothing compared the the monsterous crap that was in the rest of this film. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292387518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Star Wars: Episode One - The Phantom Menace 3D&#039; Review: Jar Jar Aside, Prequel Still Has Merit</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292241114</link>
<description>Wow, there goes the credibility of one movie reviewer.  The movie blew.  The end. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhanlon/2012/02/13/star-wars-episode-one-the-phantom-menace-3d-review-jar-jar-aside-prequel-still-has-merit/#IDComment292241114</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Rappers Love Obama, Hate Paying Him Taxes</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/whall/2012/02/13/rappers-love-obama-hate-paying-him-taxes/#IDComment291377308</link>
<description>Well, while I can appreciate the hypocricy being pointed out here I would like to say I do not like the turn of phrase &amp;quot;paying him taxes&amp;quot;.  I do not bring this up to dilute your point, it does not, but you don&amp;#039;t pay taxes to the president - or any one person at all, you pay it to the government.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/whall/2012/02/13/rappers-love-obama-hate-paying-him-taxes/#IDComment291377308</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;How I Met Your Mother&#039;: An Ideological Character Breakdown</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccarsrud/2012/02/12/how-i-met-your-mother-an-ideological-character-analysis/#IDComment291309450</link>
<description>Hes got the best comedic timing of anyone in the show.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccarsrud/2012/02/12/how-i-met-your-mother-an-ideological-character-analysis/#IDComment291309450</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;How I Met Your Mother&#039;: An Ideological Character Breakdown</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccarsrud/2012/02/12/how-i-met-your-mother-an-ideological-character-analysis/#IDComment290912201</link>
<description>in a word nothing.  In fact the growing trend is environmental certifications like LEED, which would indicate they are more liberal than anything. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccarsrud/2012/02/12/how-i-met-your-mother-an-ideological-character-analysis/#IDComment290912201</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Samuel L. Jackson: &#039;I Voted for Barack Because He Was Black&#039;; His Message Didn&#039;t Mean $%*@ To Me</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/11/samuel-l-jackson-i-voted-for-obama-because-he-was-black/#IDComment290645135</link>
<description>at least hes saying it.  A lot of people think the same exact way but won&amp;#039;t admit it. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/11/samuel-l-jackson-i-voted-for-obama-because-he-was-black/#IDComment290645135</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s Decline Among Catholics and Everyone Else, By the Numbers</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/11/obamas-decline-among-catholics-and-everyone-else-by-the-numbers/#IDComment290028399</link>
<description>most of the work i&amp;#039;ve seen shows that it would actually lower the overall cost to insurance companies.  Please understand im not trying to be argumentative, I&amp;#039;m just trying to explore the issue.  If you have a point counter to this I would genuinely appreciate seeing it. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/11/obamas-decline-among-catholics-and-everyone-else-by-the-numbers/#IDComment290028399</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama&#039;s Decline Among Catholics and Everyone Else, By the Numbers</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/11/obamas-decline-among-catholics-and-everyone-else-by-the-numbers/#IDComment289797099</link>
<description>honestly, I know this isn&amp;#039;t going to be popular, but the mandate offers a choice, and doesn&amp;#039;t actually force anyone to use any of these methods.  If the only thing keeping an employee from using this option is the lack of insurance, then the church wasn&amp;#039;t going to keep them in that desired moral condition anyways. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/11/obamas-decline-among-catholics-and-everyone-else-by-the-numbers/#IDComment289797099</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : CPAC NEWS: &#039;Grandma&#039;s Boy&#039; Star Allen Covert Ready for President Palin, Promotes Patriotic Children&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/10/cpac-news-grandmas-boy-star-allen-covert-ready-for-president-palin-promotes-patriotic-childrens-books/#IDComment289718450</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t wish more conservatives in movies and music would be out front with it.  Same for the liberals.  Just keep it off my tv all together. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/10/cpac-news-grandmas-boy-star-allen-covert-ready-for-president-palin-promotes-patriotic-childrens-books/#IDComment289718450</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Out of Touch Again: How Hollywood Elites Did Their Part to See Prop 8 Overturned</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/09/out-of-touch-again-how-hollywood-elites-did-their-part-to-see-prop-8-overturned/#IDComment288242327</link>
<description>Im going another way with this.  We all give money to watch these actors.  You can&amp;#039;t blame them for spending their money how they please.  So its either the fault of the people who fund them, the public, or the people who have money but didn&amp;#039;t speak up. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/09/out-of-touch-again-how-hollywood-elites-did-their-part-to-see-prop-8-overturned/#IDComment288242327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Madonna Targeted for Being Older and Female</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ekaris/2012/02/09/madonna-targeted-for-scorn-for-being-older-and-female/#IDComment287960250</link>
<description>&amp;quot;This sunday muscle bound men will toss around a tanned piece of leather.  Then after madonna&amp;#039;s half time show there will be football&amp;quot;  ~ P.J. Rourke. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ekaris/2012/02/09/madonna-targeted-for-scorn-for-being-older-and-female/#IDComment287960250</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Madonna Targeted for Being Older and Female</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ekaris/2012/02/09/madonna-targeted-for-scorn-for-being-older-and-female/#IDComment287928350</link>
<description>what the hell are you talking about, people make fun of Mick Jagger&amp;#039;s age all the time.  It&amp;#039;s like your saying there is no such thing as &amp;quot;acting your age&amp;quot;.  As she got older her dancing and her sex appeal, which is what shes always put first, has gone totally downhill - as tends to happen when people get older.  That isn&amp;#039;t ageism thats simply a performance standard that she set.  People shouldn&amp;#039;t have to settle for less just to protect the feelings of a celebrity. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ekaris/2012/02/09/madonna-targeted-for-scorn-for-being-older-and-female/#IDComment287928350</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Feds Debunk Food Pyramid They Pushed for Two Decades</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/feds-debunk-food-pyramid-they-pushed-for-two-decades/#IDComment287060888</link>
<description>Anyone who was about to let the government tell them how much and what to eat is probably doomed to failure anyways. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/08/feds-debunk-food-pyramid-they-pushed-for-two-decades/#IDComment287060888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Rush Limbaugh: Eastwood Got &#039;Scammed&#039; by Chrysler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/07/rush-limbaugh-eastwood-got-scammed-by-chrysler/#IDComment286919714</link>
<description>.thinking eastwood got scammed i think assumes too much stupidity from a man who has not looked stupid before.  Lets not be apolagists here. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/02/07/rush-limbaugh-eastwood-got-scammed-by-chrysler/#IDComment286919714</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>