en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1164841 Comments by 77Camaro http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77363477 I think that it's you that "committed a fairly basic logical fallacy". You said "Then we will take action and do what the FCC should be doing now." You said "We... as in the American people." and ""We" includes all Americans." Thu, 27 May 2010 18:47:30 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77363477 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77356262 I shouldn't have to explain it to you. I'm talking about "we". Thu, 27 May 2010 17:46:55 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77356262 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77355239 So now you're a "right wing extremist"? You certainly don't sound like one. Thu, 27 May 2010 17:39:03 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77355239 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77354545 Since ""We" includes all Americans.", I guess you lost too! Interesting though, I didn't even know that I was running for election in "2006 and 2008". Did the Unions and the Liberal Propaganda Machine donate to my campaign? Thu, 27 May 2010 17:33:41 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77354545 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77352942 So what election did you win? Thu, 27 May 2010 17:20:39 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77352942 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77351477 I thought you meant "we" as in not-"Republicans and corporate Democrats". What else does that leave? Progressives? Communists? Thu, 27 May 2010 17:08:37 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77351477 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77349381 There you go again using "we". When will you admit that you're the spokesperson for the progressives? Thu, 27 May 2010 16:50:52 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/05/27/top-democrats-actions-confirm-fcc-has-no-authority-to-regulate-broadband/#IDComment77349381 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77244179 Aren't the progressives the party of dope(s)? I never knew that parrots could also be dope(heads). Wed, 26 May 2010 21:29:39 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77244179 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77242637 "I've been pretty successful for the last two elections." Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in a while. Perhaps the Liberal Propaganda Machine won't be as affective this time around. "The economy has been rough but Republicans have offered voters nothing. " How would you know what the Republicans have offered voters? Your mind is closed to anything that is not progressive propaganda. Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:11 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77242637 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77240185 And like your Master, you will FAIL! Wed, 26 May 2010 20:48:51 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77240185 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77238507 I wouldn't consider anything that you or your progressive friends have to say "good news"! Wed, 26 May 2010 20:33:49 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77238507 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77236881 That appears to be the progressive dogma! Wed, 26 May 2010 20:18:10 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77236881 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77234931 In the future, I would appreciate if you don't attempt to speak for this American! Wed, 26 May 2010 19:59:06 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77234931 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77231348 Just who is "we"? Wed, 26 May 2010 19:29:20 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77231348 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77214323 He wouldn't want to take work away from you! Wed, 26 May 2010 17:11:43 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/05/26/head-start-scandal-on-par-with-acorns-antics/#IDComment77214323 http://biggovernment.com/amellon/2010/05/26/anthony-weiners-aaa-rated-attack-on-beck-and-goldline-amateur-arrogant-and-asinine/#IDComment77211104 It looks to me like an attempt at a "left"-handed boycott. Wed, 26 May 2010 16:41:53 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/amellon/2010/05/26/anthony-weiners-aaa-rated-attack-on-beck-and-goldline-amateur-arrogant-and-asinine/#IDComment77211104 http://bigjournalism.com/evbone/2010/05/25/overnight-feel-good-video-a-sneering-lefty-professor-gets-booed-at-commencement/#IDComment77206111 Thank you for this. It's been a long time since I've read any of Mr. Heinlein's personal essay work. It's really amazing what today's educational system has turned into. I dearly miss reading his stories. Wed, 26 May 2010 15:53:41 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/evbone/2010/05/25/overnight-feel-good-video-a-sneering-lefty-professor-gets-booed-at-commencement/#IDComment77206111 http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/24/seiu-huffpo-and-media-matters-is-an-unholy-alliance-about-to-unravel/#IDComment77061171 I'm new to posting here but, I have been reading blogs for some time. I have a question. When did "conflict of interest" become SOP for progressive politicians/activists/public unions and when did we allow this to become quasi-legal? Tue, 25 May 2010 16:27:52 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/24/seiu-huffpo-and-media-matters-is-an-unholy-alliance-about-to-unravel/#IDComment77061171