en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/691824 Comments by 4The_Gipper http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128470797 What we have in this country are socialists--what Joseph Sobran once rightly termed "Alienists"--who pick up on the plausible grievances of "minority groups" (one of THEIR terms that has permanently tinctured our politic rhetoric) and amplify and magnify them across decades, even centuries and millenia, to gain state power. All socialist states have co-opted the grievances of certain groups endemic to their national history, and used them as a wedge to divide, inflame, and demand their form of politics as a panacea to the sins of the offending "majority groups". In this country, we have our own examples of this with our socialist Democrat parties holding black slavery--an evil, to be sure--up as the primary evil that can only be vanquished at long last by giving power to those whose voices are loudest and most persistent in its mention. But they also borrow the centuries-old, universal Marxist plaint of class warfare (!) and the plight of the proletariat (!), or as we call it in this country, "the gap between rich and poor." To a constitutional conservative it all sounds a little concocted, but it works wonders for its practitioners in terms of assuming state control. Ultimately the call for widespread redress of grievances against such groups--American blacks, in this case--is by no means an American phenomenon; it is a Marxist tactic at its finest tailored for use in the United States by socialist (read: Democrat) politicians, and it gets results. Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:29:59 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128470797 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128463560 Bad results? I assume you're speaking of government social programs? Depends on who you are, I guess. They are nothing more than tax-payer funded voter drives, and they work like a charm. I used to see it as good intentions gone horribly wrong; now I know that they're really Democrat voter drives gone terribly right. Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:40:50 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128463560 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128450712 Does anyone else see the bitter irony of a member of the Democrats--who never cease to speak about the evils of centuries-old American slavery--believing they are entitled to practically "own" every person of a particular minority group? Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:17:15 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2011/02/16/when-its-okay-to-be-racist/#IDComment128450712 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/11/27/time-for-howard-stern-to-retire-yes/#IDComment112287599 Stern? Booooooring...Sorry, but when it comes to lampooning the sacred cows, no one holds a candle to Ms. Coulter and her work. Read her weekly column and column archives if you want something with some bite to it. Everybody in the lamestream media is just a liberal shill. Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:24:31 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2010/11/27/time-for-howard-stern-to-retire-yes/#IDComment112287599 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/11/26/cher-trashes-teabaggers-as-fking-nuts-in-other-news-chers-new-movie-opens-soft/#IDComment112284548 Cher's business model has always been, "Please don't look at my face." Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:02:19 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/11/26/cher-trashes-teabaggers-as-fking-nuts-in-other-news-chers-new-movie-opens-soft/#IDComment112284548 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/10/11/islamophobes-wapo-pulls-muhammad-cartoon-that-doesnt-show-muhammad/#IDComment103584629 Absolutely. In my bootlegged copy of the latest Liberal Reference Guide (Copyright 2010), on the Liberal Religion Respect-o-meter (scale 0-100), Christianity sits at a 2--well below Islam, which sits at 90. Of course, Judaism is at 4, Mormonism clocks in at 7, Hinduism ranks at an 81, and Buddhism ranks at a 98. Algore Environmentalism, of course, is a perfect 100. Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:44:09 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/10/11/islamophobes-wapo-pulls-muhammad-cartoon-that-doesnt-show-muhammad/#IDComment103584629 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/10/11/islamophobes-wapo-pulls-muhammad-cartoon-that-doesnt-show-muhammad/#IDComment103544763 And what's more: why are the statists crying about Barack Obama's being falsely labeled a Muslim instead of "correctly" as a Christian? Haven't they been telling us for decades that Christians are the radical hate-mongers and Muslims are followers of their "peaceful" religion? Obama, being the true liberal that he is, should look at all the people who believe he's a Muslim and say, "I'll take that as a compliment." As a leftist, he should be offended by the people who believe he's a Christian. But we all know Ann Coulter's right. He's obviously an atheist. Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:11:21 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/10/11/islamophobes-wapo-pulls-muhammad-cartoon-that-doesnt-show-muhammad/#IDComment103544763 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wthuston/2010/07/28/a-media-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/#IDComment90017505 Let me ask a question: when was the last time Joseph Stalin or Chairman Mao were mentioned in the world media as the paragons of evil, murder, and genocide? Comparisons of all kinds are drawn to Hitler and the Nazis when modern governments commit questionable human rights violations or do something so outlandishly evil as to threaten the lives of millions of a certain group of people. The "Reductio al Hiterum" is an axiom in every corner of today's political dialogue of which everyone here grasps the concept. Yet there is nothing similar that calls into question or condemns the ideology or tactics of Joseph Stalin or Mao. Why is that? I'll answer that. Hitler was a horribly evil man, and every reference to him in the media as such is certainly apt and well-made. I find something interesting, however, in Oliver Stone's complaint about Hitler never being truly understood for who he was. Oliver Stone misses entirely why Hitler's name invokes the most putrid evil the world has ever devised. It's not because the media is dominated by Jews who seek to ensure Hitler is synonymous with pure evil; it's because the media is dominated by leftists who proffer Hitler's name as such at a fever pitch to lessen the chances that history's genocidal leftist dictators with socialist and communist ideology--Stalin and Mao--will be mentioned as just as evil, just as murderous, and just as deranged. I know plenty of liberals who say Hitler was a right-winger (he was not). But I also know plenty of non-ideological, politically-neutral people who believe the same thing. But that is enough. THAT's why Hitler is always mentioned as the archbishop of the church of Satan--because "he was a right-winger." Society from time to time may ask, "But what about the dictators who killed more people than Hitler did? What was their politics?" Indeed this is a question that scares the leftist media, so rather than answer it honestly and hurt their own favorite ideological beliefs they just repeat how bad Hitler was. This is what's causing Hitler's public image crisis that is so bothering Oliver Stone. But apparently the man is an anti-Semite, and those people will say just about anything--mostly something about Jew conspiracies. But he's also a leftist, so I'm surprised he's got his knickers in a twist about Hitler's street cred. .....Because, "Hey, wasn't Hitler a right-winger, after all?" Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:26:27 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wthuston/2010/07/28/a-media-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/#IDComment90017505 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/07/22/377638/#IDComment88158519 Obama. He definitely voted for Obama. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 03:01:16 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/07/22/377638/#IDComment88158519 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/12/live-on-fox-geraldo-rivera-takes-apart-malik-zulu-shabazz/#IDComment86319361 Does anybody else find it funny at about 10:50 in the video when Geraldo Rivera gets tired of Shabazz's white oppression schtick and goes "Oh, stop with the "black" [comments]!!" as if Shabazz will see the error of this ploy and just discontinue playing his own race card in the interview? This man is a one trick pony with nothing else of substance to work with. He's not going to just "knock it off." I just found it hilarious that Geraldo expected this comment to find its target. That's like interviewing a liberal and saying "Oh, stop with the "progressive tax rates for the wealthy' stuff!" Without it, their plans for society don't ever get off the ground. Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:47:08 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/12/live-on-fox-geraldo-rivera-takes-apart-malik-zulu-shabazz/#IDComment86319361 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/06/23/daily-gut-the-self-described-wheelchair-bound-lady-magnet/#IDComment81954061 "....and no Atlantis too underwater or fictional!" Awesome--I want to see more of this guy! Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:12:12 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/06/23/daily-gut-the-self-described-wheelchair-bound-lady-magnet/#IDComment81954061 http://bigjournalism.com/jboot/2010/06/07/overnight-thread-you-are-getting-very-sleepy/#IDComment79100052 This speech--like all of his others--is like 5 or 6 long pulls on the Nyquil bottle before watching Remains of the Day. Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:23:41 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jboot/2010/06/07/overnight-thread-you-are-getting-very-sleepy/#IDComment79100052 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tslagle/2010/06/07/duh-mccartney-bushs-wife-was-a-librarian/#IDComment78985639 "Of course, perhaps Paul doesn’t think about a wife’s career choice as being valid. Paul’s last wife claimed to be a Model and a Nobel Prize nominee, but turned out to be a prostitute and a compulsive liar." I just don't think we should sink to the level of the opposition with this type of mudslinging and harmful rhetoric against someone who.......Oh---who the hell am I kidding, I fricking love this stuff. Couldn't you have added "cold-hearted, gold-digging bitch" to the end of the above line? Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:34:43 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tslagle/2010/06/07/duh-mccartney-bushs-wife-was-a-librarian/#IDComment78985639 http://bigjournalism.com/bparks/2010/05/26/when-searching-for-racists-democrats-should-back-off-rand-paul-and-look-in-the-mirror/#IDComment77426230 "...we need government intervention in certain areas in our lives." As long as they have a (D) after their names, right? Because when Bush (R) "intervened in our lives" he was a raging Nazi totalitarian who shat on the Constitution, wasn't he? Is that the nuance you guys on the left are always talking about? The nuanced position of having everyone in government believe exactly as you do when they feel the urge to meddle? Fri, 28 May 2010 04:49:09 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/bparks/2010/05/26/when-searching-for-racists-democrats-should-back-off-rand-paul-and-look-in-the-mirror/#IDComment77426230 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2010/05/14/miley-cyrus-and-christina-aguileras-edgy-new-videos-are-a-bore/#IDComment75437619 It really bothers me the way people who peddle this stuff brand it before you see it as "hip," "edgy," and "groundbreaking." And then it's so totally not any of that. At all. I don't like it either way, but it would be a lot more fun and I would appreciate it a lot more if they just prefaced it with, "Here's some smut for you--just the way you pigs like it. Enjoy." The honesty might be brutal, but it would be totally refreshing. And by the way, this article contains the truest definition of "feminism" I've ever seen. It really is an excellent article Fri, 14 May 2010 16:43:48 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lscott/2010/05/14/miley-cyrus-and-christina-aguileras-edgy-new-videos-are-a-bore/#IDComment75437619 http://biggovernment.com/gopelka/2010/05/03/in-new-york-for-the-npt-conference-king-of-unicornia-hails-u-s-nuclear-posture-review/#IDComment72605566 I think we should be skeptical to King Cornelius Pacifus' and the Unicornian position on these matters and boycott the goods they export. But only because Unicornia is pathetically lacking in diversity. It is obviously a place that is simply awash in "white" supremacy; darker-coated minority unicorns are entirely underrepresented in their population--much less their ruling class. This is a disgusting outrage. Wed, 5 May 2010 03:28:59 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/gopelka/2010/05/03/in-new-york-for-the-npt-conference-king-of-unicornia-hails-u-s-nuclear-posture-review/#IDComment72605566 http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/05/04/the-fantasy-world-according-to-contessa-brewer/#IDComment72599674 "Outdated bigotry." Would someone mind helping me differentiate the "outdated" from the "up-to-date," or "contemporary" bigotry? Is it kind of like "outdated racism" vs. "modern racism?" Oh, wait...I don't know what that means either. Hmm... Wed, 5 May 2010 03:05:39 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/05/04/the-fantasy-world-according-to-contessa-brewer/#IDComment72599674 http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/04/06/obama-swings-and-misses-when-asked-to-name-favorite-white-sox-what-does-that-tell-you/#IDComment66325932 "the 8 years before were such a cluster F$%K" You are so right! I mean, that is what the mainstream media has been telling me for a long time. I'm sure they've got it right. I really do trust Keith Olbermann, David Shuster, and Chris Matthews to shoot it straight with me--their loyal viewer! Ahem. Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:32:20 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/rtrzupek/2010/04/06/obama-swings-and-misses-when-asked-to-name-favorite-white-sox-what-does-that-tell-you/#IDComment66325932 http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/03/21/overnight-thread-health-care-debacle-congratulations-sen-john-mccain-r-media-you-made-this-day-possible/#IDComment64216236 Anyone who dislikes your bull$hit has to be listening to some TV personality? I've had enough firsthand experience in my life with you liberal idiots to have plenty of my own thoughts about your crap. It's YOUR beliefs and statements that are MSNBC, CNN, NPR, Huffington Post talking points--not mine. Talking points are not reality--they're subterfuge. Problem is, it takes a while to see what liberal policies actually accomplish, but by then you've figured out who to blame and how to excuse yourself from blame for what you did. Anyone who isn't an effete snob indoctrinated by our edukashun system--the majority of decent people in this country, in other words--sees things more of my way than yours. General misanthropy is your motivation. Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:34:10 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/03/21/overnight-thread-health-care-debacle-congratulations-sen-john-mccain-r-media-you-made-this-day-possible/#IDComment64216236 http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/03/25/2010-a-race-odyssey-disproving-a-negative-for-cash-prizes-or-how-the-civil-rights-movement-jumped-the-shark/#IDComment64091568 Nice try. This "Tea Party Cracker" didn't fall for your crap, either. Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:39:47 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/03/25/2010-a-race-odyssey-disproving-a-negative-for-cash-prizes-or-how-the-civil-rights-movement-jumped-the-shark/#IDComment64091568