Description

I am designated as a Surface Warfare Officer (SWO), Tactical Action Officer (TAO), Officer of the Deck (OOD), Afloat Training Specialist (ATS) and Naval Operational Planner, which means I am not only

Connect with Surface Force
My blogs/sites
People I'm following
Surface Force

Surface Force

31p

36 comments posted · 1 followers · following 6

16 years ago @ The Coast Guard Report - Threats and intimidation · 0 replies · +1 points

Who were the people who contacted you?

16 years ago @ The Coast Guard Report - The Problem with Coast... · 0 replies · +1 points

Any updates?

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Oh, and that whole FOR... · 1 reply · +1 points

Most likely the same reason the Navy does. ;)

17 years ago @ RyanErickson.com - CGBlog.org... there�... · 1 reply · +1 points

Ryan, I'm sure you'll do an excellent job managing the site on your own. I also look forward to seeing Peter still contribute as well.

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Coast Guard All-Star · 0 replies · 0 points

Welcome to the team Sean. I look forward to your writings.

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Open Discussion for th... · 4 replies · +2 points

"Do the unions go to this branch since the agencies of the Executive branch were closely aligned with industry officials especially before January 20, 2009?"

No, your hypothesis is not only incorrect, but disingenuous. In my opinion, it's also stupid.

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Open Discussion for th... · 6 replies · +3 points

What about it? Failure for me to comment on the Executive branch when my discussion with another poster involved the Legislative branch doesn't mean I've "forgotten" anything.

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Open Discussion for th... · 9 replies · +3 points

How about it? And no, you do think wrong as you are not using it at all in the same context I was.

Again, read your own book about Congress that you seem to have "forgotten".

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Open Discussion for th... · 11 replies · +1 points

Why are you bringing up who has the ear of the Commandant and Senior CG Leaders when I was not referencing them at all PJ? If you want me to guess who has their ear, I'd wager that both their respective staffs and their Immediate Superior in Command do.

Read the book you wrote for which you choose the title "Parliment of Whores", and you'll find what I was getting at regarding the nexus between labor unions and the current party in control of Congress though Mr. O'Rourke

17 years ago @ CGBlog.org :: An Unoff... - Open Discussion for th... · 14 replies · +3 points

Sorry, I don't have any links such as a proposed rule in the Federal Register and that sort, just a recollection of what I have heard discussed. I personally agree with you regarding the rationale TWIC and the proposed MMC remaining seperate. But, there is strong pressure from the maritime unions right now on combining the two. Given the current make-up on Congress, we can both guess who has the ear of those on the Hill right now.
« Previous1234Next »
an Automattic logo Brainchild

Home Features About Press Developers Help

© 2026 Automattic Inc. TOS | Privacy Policy | Privacy Notice for California Users