And you all wonder why women don't want to be named in these things.

So ashamed to read these comments today. You don't know if she's lying, and look at you all. No one cares? No one thinks this, if true, says something about Mr. Cain?

That has already been debunked. Not the Axelrod you're thinking of.

It's ok with you if he treated someone like that, as long as she wasn't an employee? How do you imagine Mrs. Cain feels about it?

Great. They're trying to find jobs for people. Maybe when they're done with that, they can work on FINDING JOBS FOR THEIR CONSTITUENTS.

Oh my Lord.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/wein...

Breitbart understands that you have to engage with all kinds of people to reach the people who need to hear the truth. You can't hide in a conservative cocoon and expect your message to get out.

I would imagine that's the reason he goes on a variety of programs.

Breitbart said he wouldn't "publish" it. I never heard him say he'd never show it to anyone. Did he? (I'm asking rhetorically, but I suppose there's a chance I could be wrong.)

Oh my God, people - toughen up. You all sound like you have some kind of media-induced PTSD. This isn't Breitbart's fault, and if you hear someone say it is, just explain what happened.

I'm sure he wishes now he'd never consented to show it to them, but that doesn't make him the bad guy. It makes this dishonest shock jock the bad guy...so instead of wringing your hands over what you expect the media to do with this, FIGHT BACK FOR ONCE.

What is this man going to do when he finally gets the memo that those were, in fact, not even crosshairs, but surveryors' symbols?

What an idiot.