<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>unamuno42's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/679815</link>
		<description>Comments by unamuno42</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : HOWARD ZINNâS LEGACY: Religious Fanaticism and Illegal Indoctrination of Your Children</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2010/02/04/howard-zinns-legacy-religious-fanatacism-and-the-illegal-indoctrination-of-your-children/#IDComment55352810</link>
<description>Kristine, which bible has been confirmed? the Jewish one? the Christian one? LDS? Koran?__Also, a lot of your arguments might be an argument for some type of creator or designer but not necessarily for a loving , personal God. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2010/02/04/howard-zinns-legacy-religious-fanatacism-and-the-illegal-indoctrination-of-your-children/#IDComment55352810</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'I Believe In Eco-Terrorism': Does James Cameron Live In a Malibu Mansion?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52806959</link>
<description>You are both really witty. :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52806959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'I Believe In Eco-Terrorism': Does James Cameron Live In a Malibu Mansion?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52805720</link>
<description>You are in love with  the word &amp;quot;mental,&amp;quot; aren&amp;#039;t you. I bet you would like to take the word &amp;quot;mental&amp;quot; behind the school and get it pregnant. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52805720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 'I Believe In Eco-Terrorism': Does James Cameron Live In a Malibu Mansion?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52804862</link>
<description>Try reading a book for a change. Lots of them are are least open to the idea of individualism, capitalism, and ethics. Best of all, you do not have to take a shower afterwards to scrub off the insulting stench of lowest common denominator liberalism. I recommend Dilbert as a warm-up, Ann Rand as an apertif, and the Golden Age by John Wright as the main course. A Confederacy of Dunces is also high on my book list. O&amp;#039;Toole&amp;#039;s magnum opus is a bracing reminder that in every person, conservative , liberal or otherwise, lurks a kernel of hubris, hypocrisy, and willfull blindness. Take me for example. I am being a hypocrite today because I am typing this and reading Big Hollywood instead of studying for medical school. I hope Kieth Olberman does not call me out for my foolishness (and for being a naked hand model in the late 80&amp;#039;s) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/01/18/i-believe-in-eco-terrorism-does-james-cameron-live-in-a-malibu-mansion/#IDComment52804862</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Cinematical: Leave That Child Rapist Polanski Alone!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/31/cinematical-leave-that-child-rapist-polanski-alone/#IDComment49864911</link>
<description>Just to be clear, because I play banjo. You want to punish Polanski with what was happening in Deliverance while the banjo was playing right? Its not the music that bothers you? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/31/cinematical-leave-that-child-rapist-polanski-alone/#IDComment49864911</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Cinematical: Leave That Child Rapist Polanski Alone!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/31/cinematical-leave-that-child-rapist-polanski-alone/#IDComment49864696</link>
<description>I agree with you. Rape and beatings violate the prisoner&amp;#039;s  constitutional rights and are a sin against God. That kind of punishment is unlawful and a throwback to Pagan times.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/31/cinematical-leave-that-child-rapist-polanski-alone/#IDComment49864696</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : HuffPoster More Outraged By Polanski Critics Than Child Rape</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/30/huffposter-more-outraged-by-polanski-critics-than-child-rape/#IDComment49715068</link>
<description>Historically speaking , the right wingers are really unlucky these day because they do not have any truly evil role models to look up to and emmulate. The leftys have so many, so many. Polanski, Chavez, ACORN, The Chinese Communist Dictators. Lucky bastards. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/30/huffposter-more-outraged-by-polanski-critics-than-child-rape/#IDComment49715068</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : HuffPoster More Outraged By Polanski Critics Than Child Rape</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/30/huffposter-more-outraged-by-polanski-critics-than-child-rape/#IDComment49714384</link>
<description>I blame our imperialistic invasion of Iraq which forced innocent villagers like Polanski to do unspeakable crimes.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/30/huffposter-more-outraged-by-polanski-critics-than-child-rape/#IDComment49714384</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Google: Openness for Thee, But Not For Me</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382926</link>
<description>they totally want to hear from us true americans, that is the patriots who support every iota of the sacred health care bill in all of its past, present, and future forms.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382926</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Google: Openness for Thee, But Not For Me</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382738</link>
<description>who do you use a search engine? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382738</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Google: Openness for Thee, But Not For Me</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382683</link>
<description>If they kill off Microsoft I will totally become BFF with Google. I loathe microsoft.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/12/28/google-openness-for-thee-but-not-for-me/#IDComment49382683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Stand Up Notes From Flyover Country: Lady HaHa</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/12/28/stand-up-notes-from-flyover-country-lady-haha/#IDComment49380309</link>
<description>I predict not that well. Counseling will not obviate the need for a life grounded in solid values.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/12/28/stand-up-notes-from-flyover-country-lady-haha/#IDComment49380309</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : For Conservative Movie Lovers: Hal Needham, Burt Reynolds and âSmokey and the Banditâ Part 4</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2009/12/26/for-conservative-movie-lovers-hal-needham-burt-reynolds-and-smokey-and-the-bandit-part-4/#IDComment49127644</link>
<description>Was that Shelley Duvall in the stairway scene in 2001 as the shuttle brings up the passengers to the space station? I can see why it took 100 takes. She ends up walking on to the ceiling. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2009/12/26/for-conservative-movie-lovers-hal-needham-burt-reynolds-and-smokey-and-the-bandit-part-4/#IDComment49127644</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Why 'Phantom Menace' Sucks: A Brilliant 70-Minute Explanation (NSFW)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/why-phantom-menace-sucks-a-brilliant-70-minute-explanation-nsfw/#IDComment48025092</link>
<description>A.I flowed with such a tragic sensibility that it still moves me today. It did not at all feel like a typical Spielberg popcorn fest. Parodoxically, I only have seen it once and do not feel the urge to see it again.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/why-phantom-menace-sucks-a-brilliant-70-minute-explanation-nsfw/#IDComment48025092</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Why 'Phantom Menace' Sucks: A Brilliant 70-Minute Explanation (NSFW)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/why-phantom-menace-sucks-a-brilliant-70-minute-explanation-nsfw/#IDComment48024526</link>
<description>I agree. I like Return. The only thing that ruins that movie for me are those stupid cheesy Ewoks. How I wanted the Empire to crush them into some admixture that could be then be served as a Mcdonald&amp;#039;s hamburger. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/12/18/why-phantom-menace-sucks-a-brilliant-70-minute-explanation-nsfw/#IDComment48024526</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : For Conservative Movie Lovers: Hal Needham, Burt Reynolds and âSmokey and the Banditâ Part 3</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2009/12/19/for-conservative-movie-lovers-hal-needham-burt-reynolds-and-smokey-and-the-bandit-part-3/#IDComment48019467</link>
<description>I am asking seriously, why can I not enjoy the Honeymooners? Did watching modern tv comedies ruin me somehow? How and where can I get some Jackie Gleason mojo. This issue also comes up when I try to watch older classic movies like Stagecoach, Breakfast at Tiffanies, etc.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lgrin/2009/12/19/for-conservative-movie-lovers-hal-needham-burt-reynolds-and-smokey-and-the-bandit-part-3/#IDComment48019467</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : REVIEW: Reitman's 'Up in the Air' Built With Award Season In Mind, Not Audiences</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729957</link>
<description>but are not we all salieris in a way. I know I am. Just 97th percentile, that&amp;#039;s all I ever will be, not equal to the true geniuses.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729957</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : REVIEW: Reitman's 'Up in the Air' Built With Award Season In Mind, Not Audiences</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729341</link>
<description>No, and you are making an informal logical fallacy. I think it is called argumentum baculum. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729341</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : REVIEW: Reitman's 'Up in the Air' Built With Award Season In Mind, Not Audiences</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729245</link>
<description>what is so good about it. you should write a mini-review. When I try to read up on it through the interwebnet it is hard to tell if it is just campy or quality.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/16/review-reitmans-up-in-the-air-too-aloof/#IDComment47729245</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : 25 Greatest Christmas Films: #12 -- 'One Magic Christmas' (1985)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/14/25-greatest-christmas-films-12-one-magic-christmas-1985/#IDComment47129628</link>
<description>But all Angels are strangers until you get to know them. My Rabbi told me to Tattoo this wise saying on my knuckles so I would never forget it.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/12/14/25-greatest-christmas-films-12-one-magic-christmas-1985/#IDComment47129628</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>
