Now, if anybody wants to read something, try reading the Constitution, specifically, Article III, The Judicial Branch, and you'll discover this:

The Supreme Court has no authority what-so-ever to modify the Constitution in any way. That's because the Constitution isn't "law," but Superlaw, rising high above the Supremes. There isn't a process for declaring law (un)Constitutional. Nothing. It's a de-facto power that's never been challenged. So if the Left want to play games by vomiting legislators onto the bench, we're going to develop a process for determining Constitutionality long overdue.

For anyone with half a brain knows it's better than no brain at all.

Anyone with half a brain knows the Constitution can be amended, so in that context, sure, it's “living.

Of course, anyone with a half a brain knows that by “living,” the Sans Verite mean, “evolving,” on the one hand, and “...the Constitution means what the Supreme Court 'says' it means,” on the other.

Ha! But anyone with half a brain surely knows a “so-called” progressive is--ha, ha--the worst example of evolution imaginable, more akin to a voluntary "dumbing-down," in other words, no brain at all.

And anyone with a half a brain knows that if the Supremes define what the Constitution "means," that opens up the Constitutional Conundrum which states, “If a Supreme Court majority can nullify a part of the Constitution, THEN THEY CAN NULLIFY THE WHOLE DAMN THING!”

Want a weekend assignment? Well, if you've a Conservative, or an anti, “so-called,” progressive, then listen up (for those of you who aren't already in the know, that is). “Pot-head” Peter Lewis, the owner and CEO of Progressive Insurance, is one of two nutty billionaires driving the modern, “so-called,” progressive movement in America (along side “Mr. Insider Trading,” George Soros.) That means if you have a Progressive insurance policy, you're just cutting your own throat (or that of your kids and grand kids). So cancel the damn thing this weekend and move on to a competitor. Hey, you want to DO something, then DO that.

As far as I'm concerned, no Conservative worth his salt would be caught dead owning a Progressive policy. Period.

In yet another example of the rank stupidity--STUPIDITY--of liberals, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend insisted that Obama is more in tune with American Catholics than the Pope because American Catholics don't care much for enforcing rational social norms or protecting innocent life. But isn't the whole point of being Catholic, or a member of any religion, to be in tune with:

GOD

Yeah, I think is is. Stupid bitc%^&%[***CENSORED*** (see "NOTE" below.)]...h.

NOTE: this word has been automatically censored and the user reported to the IRS and FBI for investigation.
The Obama Brown Shirt Brigade.
"Protecting free speech through intimidation since 2009."

There's no such thing as fiscal or social Conservatism: as a philosophy of life, such hair-splitting is of no value what-so-ever. You either believe in the individual over "Society" (which is a complete fiction, by-the-way, because it isn't "real"), or you don't. So-called fiscal Conservatives should speak out against the public funding of abortion or the usurpation of the Constitution by a rouge Supreme Court in Roe V. Wade, which advanced the "Paper Tyrant Syndrome" markedly, as much as they speak to the subject of privacy, but they don't...why? Easy: they're not Conservatives.

I don't need to read it. No Conservative does: same ol' Leftist BS jotted down over and over again, you know, "...tell a lie often enough and people (the stupid ones) will see it as truth"? Here are three off the top of my head:

The Communist Manifesto
Mein Kampf
Rules for Radicals

See what I mean?

There's a chair with an uneven leg...

The Conservative props up the short leg.

The Liberal cuts the other three, "racist, bigoted, hateful, Christian, uncaring, homophobic, NRA lovin', greedy, rich, white, and unnecessarily competitive" legs down.

Wow, this is fun...and so easy!

We know them so much better than they know us!

I know must of you know this already, but...

Please, for the love of God, watch out for people posting here pretending to care about ending the so-called "progressive" agenda (you know, the ones who write, "...it's not working..."): it's taken 100 years of lies and deceptions to get to where we are now.

We're not going to defeat it overnight (of course, it's going to die off on its own—like Communism—in about 300 years but who wants to wait that long?) Anybody who writes that they're ready to give up is most likely a plant spreading propaganda (or a weakling). Don't buy into it.

Overturning the 16th Amendment is going to take a lot more money, time, and energy than any of us have put into this Project or the tea parties—a hell of lot more. Our time will come.

Remember, "Don't Tread on Me!"

The Sans Pareil (not Republicans, mind you, but Conservatives) make the world a better place.

The Sans Vérité, with the help of the Rubicons (i.e. "Useful Idiots" or, commonly, Liberals) steal the credit AND BITCH THAT IT'S NOT PEFECT!

Countering Propaganda from the “Useful Idiots” (or Roobs):

You may have read about this site's lack luster stats on Alexa, a web information company that tracks web traffic, but this is typical of the uneducated Roobs who fail routinely to understand technology in general and specifically that the comments on this site are powered by a 3rd party, intensedebate. When you compare this site (adding in intensedebate's traffic) to "mediamatters," the912project exceeds the, "Insane Soros Brainwashing Machine (ISBM)." The sole question remaining is how much of the traffic on intensedebate comes from the912project?

The Roobs who troll here will say, “none.”